Literature DB >> 2211741

Adjustments to the segment center of mass proportions of Clauser et al. (1969).

R N Hinrichs1.   

Abstract

One of the most commonly-referenced studies on body segment masses and centers of mass is by Clauser et al. (AMRL Technical Report 69-70, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1969). The Clauser et al. data, however, are difficult to use, because the investigators used certain bony landmarks rather than joint centers as reference points for the center of mass proportions. The purpose of this study was to make adjustments to those proportions so that they could be applied directly to segments having joint centers as endpoints. The segments affected by these adjustments were the trunk, upper arm, forearm, thigh, and calf. These new proportions are markedly different than those originally reported by Clauser et al., especially for the trunk segment. Readers are cautioned against using the original proportions when using joint centers as segment endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2211741     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90361-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

Review 1.  The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report.

Authors:  D J Pearsall; J G Reid
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Inertial properties of the human trunk of males determined from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D J Pearsall; J G Reid; R Ross
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  The effect of performance demands on lower extremity biomechanics during landing and cutting tasks.

Authors:  Boyi Dai; William E Garrett; Michael T Gross; Darin A Padua; Robin M Queen; Bing Yu
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 7.179

4.  A biomechanical model correlating shoulder kinetics to pain in young baseball pitchers.

Authors:  David W Keeley; Gretchen D Oliver; Christopher P Dougherty
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Oscillation and reaction board techniques for estimating inertial properties of a below-knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Jeremy D Smith; Abbie E Ferris; Gary D Heise; Richard N Hinrichs; Philip E Martin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 1.355

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.