Literature DB >> 22116666

Comparison of detection procedures of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyosynoviae, and Mycoplasma hyorhinis in lungs, tonsils, and synovial fluid of slaughtered pigs and their distributions in Thailand.

Metta Makhanon1, Padet Tummaruk, Pacharee Thongkamkoon, Roongroje Thanawongnuwech, Nuvee Prapasarakul.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether direct PCR (DP) gave similar results to culture prior to PCR (CPP) for detecting mycoplasmas in different types of pig tissues. A total of 724 samples obtained from lungs, tonsils, or synovial fluids from 270 slaughtered pigs were used. The history of clinical signs, lung score, and the presence of joint lesions were recorded during sample collection. The rates of detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyosynoviae, and Mycoplasma hyorhinis using both procedures were evaluated. The overall prevalences of M. hyopneumoniae, M. hyosynoviae, and M. hyorhinis were 40.3%, 12.3%, and 64.6%, respectively, and the detection rate depended on the sample type and the procedure used. With lung tissue, DP gave a higher detection rate for M. hyopneumoniae (77.4%) than CPP (38.5%). M. hyorhinis was detected by CPP at 15.6% and 18.1% and by DP at 31.5% and 5.2%, respectively. The positive rate derived from tonsil from CPP was closed to that of DP. Using synovial fluid could not yield any positive M. hyorhinis from CPP whereas 37.2% was positive from DP. In contrast, using sample tissue from lung and tonsil by CPP could show much higher positive number than that of DP. There was a significant relationship between joint lesion and M. hyorhinis detection by DP (P < 0.05) but not for M. hyosynoviae and M. hyorhinis detected by CPP. We speculated that lung was a proper sample for M. hyopneumoniae and M. hyorhinis detection by DP and CPP, respectively. Tonsil was likely the community of persistent M. hyosynoviae and M. hyorhinis with highly detection by CPP. Synovial fluid was apparently unsuitable for mycoplasmal culture. The accuracy of mycoplasmal detection may depend upon the type of sample relevant to the detection procedure used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116666     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-0022-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  28 in total

1.  Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement.

Authors:  N J Blackman; J J Koval
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The predictive value of microbiologic diagnostic tests if asymptomatic carriers are present.

Authors:  Ronny K Gunnarsson; Jan Lanke
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison of molecular techniques for the typing of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae isolates.

Authors:  Tim Stakenborg; Jo Vicca; Dominiek Maes; Johan Peeters; Aart de Kruif; Freddy Haesebrouck; Patrick Butaye
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.363

4.  Mycoplasma hyorhinis infection levels in lungs of piglets with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS).

Authors:  H Kobayashi; T Morozumi; C Miyamoto; M Shimizu; S Yamada; S Ohashi; M Kubo; K Kimura; K Mitani; N Ito; K Yamamoto
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Use of a novel serum ELISA method and the tonsil-carrier state for evaluation of Mycoplasma hyosynoviae distributions in pig herds with or without clinical arthritis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen; Klara Tølbøll Lauritsen; Niels Filskov Friis; Claes Enøe; Tine Hagedorn-Olsen; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  An investigation of bacterial causes of arthritis in slaughter hogs.

Authors:  H Hariharan; J MacDonald; B Carnat; J Bryenton; S Heaney
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Use of a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae nested polymerase chain reaction test to determine the optimal sampling sites in swine.

Authors:  Kathy T Kurth; Tsungda Hsu; Eric R Snook; Eileen L Thacker; Brad J Thacker; F Chris Minion
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Rapid, sensitive PCR-based detection of mycoplasmas in simulated samples of animal sera.

Authors:  O Dussurget; D Roulland-Dussoix
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Relevance of serology for Mycoplasma pneumoniae diagnosis compared with PCR and culture in acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma.

Authors:  Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Doaa Raafat; Amal Abd El Metaal
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae colonization at weaning on disease severity in growing pigs.

Authors:  Eduardo Fano; Carlos Pijoan; Scott Dee; John Deen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.310

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for detecting Mycoplasma hyosynoviae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis in pen-based oral, tonsillar, and nasal fluids.

Authors:  João Carlos Gomes Neto; Leslie Bower; Barbara Z Erickson; Chong Wang; Matthew Raymond; Erin L Strait
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  Genome Sequences of Seven Mycoplasma hyosynoviae Strains Isolated from the Joint Tissue of Infected Swine (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Eric Bumgardner; Russell F Bey; Weerayuth Kittichotirat; Roger E Bumgarner; Paulraj K Lawrence
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-06-05

3.  Early detection and differential serodiagnosis of Mycoplasma hyorhinis and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae infections under experimental conditions.

Authors:  Luis G Giménez-Lirola; Henrique Meiroz-De-Souza-Almeida; Ronaldo L Magtoto; Aric J McDaniel; Maria M Merodio; Franco S Matias Ferreyra; Korakrit Poonsuk; Igor R H Gatto; David H Baum; Richard F Ross; Paulo H E Arruda; Kent J Schwartz; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Rachel J Derscheid; Bailey L Arruda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.