BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hippocampal development is poorly understood. This study evaluated the normal development of the hippocampal region during the fetal period by using MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 63 fetuses without intracranial pathology were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists with no knowledge of the fetal GA. Three MR images were performed postmortem and 60 in vivo. The progress of hippocampal inversion was analyzed in coronal sections, and the left and right sides of the hippocampal region were compared in every case. RESULTS: The fetuses in the postmortem examinations were at GWs 17-18 and in the in vivo examinations, at GWs 19-36. The hippocampal sulcus was open, bi- or unilaterally, in 39 fetuses. The oldest was at GW 32. The sulcus was closed at GW 21 at the earliest, unilaterally. In 26/63 fetuses (41%), the deepening or closure of the hippocampal sulcus or hippocampal inversion was asymmetric; in 23 fetuses, the right side developed faster. A shallow collateral sulcus was found earliest at GW 17. A deep collateral sulcus was visible earliest at GW 26 unilaterally, but in all fetuses from GW 31 onward, it was seen bilaterally. The orientation of the collateral sulcus was not related to the GA. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide individual temporal variations in the development and the inversion process of the hippocampal sulcus as well as in the formation of the collateral sulcus. Asymmetric development is common, and in most of the asymmetric cases, the right hippocampus develops faster.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hippocampal development is poorly understood. This study evaluated the normal development of the hippocampal region during the fetal period by using MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 63 fetuses without intracranial pathology were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists with no knowledge of the fetal GA. Three MR images were performed postmortem and 60 in vivo. The progress of hippocampal inversion was analyzed in coronal sections, and the left and right sides of the hippocampal region were compared in every case. RESULTS: The fetuses in the postmortem examinations were at GWs 17-18 and in the in vivo examinations, at GWs 19-36. The hippocampal sulcus was open, bi- or unilaterally, in 39 fetuses. The oldest was at GW 32. The sulcus was closed at GW 21 at the earliest, unilaterally. In 26/63 fetuses (41%), the deepening or closure of the hippocampal sulcus or hippocampal inversion was asymmetric; in 23 fetuses, the right side developed faster. A shallow collateral sulcus was found earliest at GW 17. A deep collateral sulcus was visible earliest at GW 26 unilaterally, but in all fetuses from GW 31 onward, it was seen bilaterally. The orientation of the collateral sulcus was not related to the GA. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide individual temporal variations in the development and the inversion process of the hippocampal sulcus as well as in the formation of the collateral sulcus. Asymmetric development is common, and in most of the asymmetric cases, the right hippocampus develops faster.
Authors: Piotr A Habas; Julia A Scott; Ahmad Roosta; Vidya Rajagopalan; Kio Kim; Francois Rousseau; A James Barkovich; Orit A Glenn; Colin Studholme Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: P D Griffiths; M J Reeves; J E Morris; G Mason; S A Russell; M N J Paley; E H Whitby Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Stephen Chan; Jacqueline A Bello; Shlomo Shinnar; Dale C Hesdorffer; Darrell V Lewis; James MacFall; Ruth C Shinnar; William Gomes; Claire Litherland; Yuan Xu; Douglas R Nordli; John M Pellock; L Matthew Frank; Solomon L Moshé; Shumei Sun Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: A C McClelland; W A Gomes; S Shinnar; D C Hesdorffer; E Bagiella; D V Lewis; J A Bello; S Chan; J MacFall; M Chen; J M Pellock; D R Nordli; L M Frank; S L Moshé; R C Shinnar; S Sun Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ashok Panigrahy; Vincent Lee; Rafael Ceschin; Giulio Zuccoli; Nancy Beluk; Omar Khalifa; Jodie K Votava-Smith; Mark DeBrunner; Ricardo Munoz; Yuliya Domnina; Victor Morell; Peter Wearden; Joan Sanchez De Toledo; William Devine; Maliha Zahid; Cecilia W Lo Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Maxwell J Roeske; Maureen McHugo; Simon Vandekar; Jennifer Urbano Blackford; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Lorenzo Caciagli; Britta Wandschneider; Fenglai Xiao; Christian Vollmar; Maria Centeno; Sjoerd B Vos; Karin Trimmel; Meneka K Sidhu; Pamela J Thompson; Gavin P Winston; John S Duncan; Matthias J Koepp Journal: Brain Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501