Literature DB >> 22115785

Comparative procedures for sample processing and quantitative PCR detection of grapevine viruses.

Fatima Osman1, Tammi Olineka, Emir Hodzic, Deborah Golino, Adib Rowhani.   

Abstract

In this study different instruments and methods used for tissue homogenization, RNA extraction and quantitative PCR (qPCR) based detection of grapevine RNA viruses were evaluated. Semi-automated and automated homogenization techniques were compared to process samples from grapevine petioles and cambial tissue. Four different high throughput automated nucleic acid extraction platforms were compared with the RNeasy plant extraction kit for their capacity and efficiency of extracting viral RNA from grapevine infected tissues. The RNA prepared from each extraction platform was then used as template for a comparative analysis of qPCR by One Step RT-qPCR, Two Step RT-qPCR and low density array (LDA) detection. This study showed that a thorough homogenization of grapevine tissues using the Tissue Lyser as well as DNase digestion of the purified RNA prior to cDNA synthesis improved the virus detection and yielded the lowest quantitation cycle (Cq) values in RT-qPCR. Comparison of different RNA extraction methods showed that methods implementing the magnetic bead-based technology were superior to other methods used. Comparing different qPCR detection methods, One Step RT-qPCR showed the lowest Cq values for the same sample tested compared to Two Step RT-qPCR and LDA.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22115785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  6 in total

1.  Methylation and gene expression responses to ethanol feeding and betaine supplementation in the cystathionine beta synthase-deficient mouse.

Authors:  Valentina Medici; Diane I Schroeder; Rima Woods; Janine M LaSalle; Yongzhi Geng; Noreene M Shibata; Janet Peerson; Emir Hodzic; Sanjana Dayal; Hidekazu Tsukamoto; Kusum K Kharbanda; Brittany Tillman; Samuel W French; Charles H Halsted
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Evaluation of three automated nucleic acid extraction systems for identification of respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by multiplex real-time PCR.

Authors:  Yoonjung Kim; Mi-Soon Han; Juwon Kim; Aerin Kwon; Kyung-A Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A Pathogen Secreted Protein as a Detection Marker for Citrus Huanglongbing.

Authors:  Deborah Pagliaccia; Jinxia Shi; Zhiqian Pang; Eva Hawara; Kelley Clark; Shree P Thapa; Agustina D De Francesco; Jianfeng Liu; Thien-Toan Tran; Sohrab Bodaghi; Svetlana Y Folimonova; Veronica Ancona; Ashok Mulchandani; Gitta Coaker; Nian Wang; Georgios Vidalakis; Wenbo Ma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Responses to climatic and pathogen threats differ in biodynamic and conventional vines.

Authors:  Isabelle Soustre-Gacougnolle; Marc Lollier; Carine Schmitt; Mireille Perrin; Estelle Buvens; Jean-François Lallemand; Mélanie Mermet; Mélanie Henaux; Christelle Thibault-Carpentier; Doulaye Dembelé; Damien Steyer; Céline Clayeux; Anne Moneyron; Jean E Masson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  F0F1-ATPase Contributes to the Fluoride Tolerance and Cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Cai Qi; Sirui Yang; Zhengyi Li; Biao Ren; Jiyao Li; Xuedong Zhou; Huawei Cai; Xin Xu; Xian Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: From Diagnosis to Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Zhina Hadisi; Tavia Walsh; Seyed Mohammad Hossein Dabiri; Amir Seyfoori; David Hamdi; Bahram Mirani; Erik Pagan; Armando Jardim; Mohsen Akbari
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.