OBJECTIVES: Here we assess the intrinsic functions of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) using Cxcr4 heterozygous (Cxcr4(+/-)) mice. BACKGROUND: Myocardial necrosis triggers complex remodeling and inflammatory changes. The chemokine CXCL12 has been implicated in protection and therapeutic regeneration after MI through recruiting angiogenic outgrowth cells, improving neovascularization and cardiac function, but the endogenous role of its receptor CXCR4 is unknown. METHODS: MI was induced by ligation of the left descending artery. Langendoff perfusion, echocardiography, quantitative immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, angiogenesis assays, and cardiomyocyte analysis were performed. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, infarct size was reduced in Cxcr4(+/-) mice compared with wild-type mice and in respective bone marrow chimeras compared with controls. This was associated with altered inflammatory cell recruitment, decreased neutrophil content, delayed monocyte infiltration, and a predominance of Gr1(low) over classic Gr1(high) monocytes. Basal coronary flow and its recovery after MI were impaired in Cxcr4(+/-)mice, paralleled by reduced angiogenesis, myocardial vessel density, and endothelial cell count. Notably, no differences in cardiac function were seen in Cxcr4(+/-)mice compared with wild-type mice. Despite defective angiogenesis, Cxcr4(+/-) mouse hearts showed no difference in CXCL12, vascular endothelial growth factor or apoptosis-related gene expression. Electron microscopy revealed lipofuscin-like lipid accumulation in Cxcr4(+/-) mouse hearts and analysis of lipid extracts detected high levels of phosphatidylserine, which protect cardiomyocytes from hypoxic stress in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4 plays a crucial role in endogenous remodeling processes after MI, contributing to inflammatory/progenitor cell recruitment and neovascularization, whereas its deficiency limits infarct size and causes adaptation to hypoxic stress. This should be carefully scrutinized when devising therapeutic strategies involving the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis.
OBJECTIVES: Here we assess the intrinsic functions of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) using Cxcr4 heterozygous (Cxcr4(+/-)) mice. BACKGROUND: Myocardial necrosis triggers complex remodeling and inflammatory changes. The chemokine CXCL12 has been implicated in protection and therapeutic regeneration after MI through recruiting angiogenic outgrowth cells, improving neovascularization and cardiac function, but the endogenous role of its receptor CXCR4 is unknown. METHODS: MI was induced by ligation of the left descending artery. Langendoff perfusion, echocardiography, quantitative immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, angiogenesis assays, and cardiomyocyte analysis were performed. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, infarct size was reduced in Cxcr4(+/-) mice compared with wild-type mice and in respective bone marrow chimeras compared with controls. This was associated with altered inflammatory cell recruitment, decreased neutrophil content, delayed monocyte infiltration, and a predominance of Gr1(low) over classic Gr1(high) monocytes. Basal coronary flow and its recovery after MI were impaired in Cxcr4(+/-)mice, paralleled by reduced angiogenesis, myocardial vessel density, and endothelial cell count. Notably, no differences in cardiac function were seen in Cxcr4(+/-)mice compared with wild-type mice. Despite defective angiogenesis, Cxcr4(+/-) mouse hearts showed no difference in CXCL12, vascular endothelial growth factor or apoptosis-related gene expression. Electron microscopy revealed lipofuscin-like lipid accumulation in Cxcr4(+/-) mouse hearts and analysis of lipid extracts detected high levels of phosphatidylserine, which protect cardiomyocytes from hypoxic stress in vitro. CONCLUSIONS:CXCR4 plays a crucial role in endogenous remodeling processes after MI, contributing to inflammatory/progenitor cell recruitment and neovascularization, whereas its deficiency limits infarct size and causes adaptation to hypoxic stress. This should be carefully scrutinized when devising therapeutic strategies involving the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis.
Authors: Bryan B Edwards; Alexander S Fairman; Jeffrey E Cohen; John W MacArthur; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey B Woo; William Hiesinger; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Christine S Zuern; Britta Walker; Martina Sauter; Malte Schaub; Madhumita Chatterjee; Karin Mueller; Dominik Rath; Sebastian Vogel; Roland Tegtmeyer; Peter Seizer; Tobias Geisler; Reinhard Kandolf; Florian Lang; Karin Klingel; Meinrad Gawaz; Oliver Borst Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mary Caitlin P Sok; Maxianne C Tria; Claire E Olingy; Cheryl L San Emeterio; Edward A Botchwey Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 8.947