Literature DB >> 22114842

The diversity of microbial responses to nitric oxide and agents of nitrosative stress close cousins but not identical twins.

Lesley A H Bowman1, Samantha McLean, Robert K Poole, Jon M Fukuto.   

Abstract

Nitric oxide and related nitrogen species (reactive nitrogen species) now occupy a central position in contemporary medicine, physiology, biochemistry, and microbiology. In particular, NO plays important antimicrobial defenses in innate immunity but microbes have evolved intricate NO-sensing and defense mechanisms that are the subjects of a vast literature. Unfortunately, the burgeoning NO literature has not always been accompanied by an understanding of the intricacies and complexities of this radical and other reactive nitrogen species so that there exists confusion and vagueness about which one or more species exert the reported biological effects. The biological chemistry of NO and derived/related molecules is complex, due to multiple species that can be generated from NO in biological milieu and numerous possible reaction targets. Moreover, the fate and disposition of NO is always a function of its biological environment, which can vary significantly even within a single cell. In this review, we consider newer aspects of the literature but, most importantly, consider the underlying chemistry and draw attention to the distinctiveness of NO and its chemical cousins, nitrosonium (NO(+)), nitroxyl (NO(-), HNO), peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)), nitrite (NO(2)(-)), and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)). All these species are reported to be generated in biological systems from initial formation of NO (from nitrite, NO synthases, or other sources) or its provision in biological experiments (typically from NO gas, S-nitrosothiols, or NO donor compounds). The major targets of NO and nitrosative damage (metal centers, thiols, and others) are reviewed and emphasis is given to newer "-omic" methods of unraveling the complex repercussions of NO and nitrogen oxide assaults. Microbial defense mechanisms, many of which are critical for pathogenicity, include the activities of hemoglobins that enzymically detoxify NO (to nitrate) and NO reductases and repair mechanisms (e.g., those that reverse S-nitrosothiol formation). Microbial resistance to these stresses is generally inducible and many diverse transcriptional regulators are involved-some that are secondary sensors (such as Fnr) and those that are "dedicated" (such as NorR, NsrR, NssR) in that their physiological function appears to be detecting primarily NO and then regulating expression of genes that encode enzymes with NO as a substrate. Although generally harmful, evidence is accumulating that NO may have beneficial effects, as in the case of the squid-Vibrio light-organ symbiosis, where NO serves as a signal, antioxidant, and specificity determinant. Progress in this area will require a thorough understanding not only of the biology but also of the underlying chemical principles.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22114842     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387661-4.00006-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol        ISSN: 0065-2911            Impact factor:   3.517


  43 in total

1.  Proteasomal control of cytokinin synthesis protects Mycobacterium tuberculosis against nitric oxide.

Authors:  Marie I Samanovic; Shengjiang Tu; Ondřej Novák; Lakshminarayan M Iyer; Fiona E McAllister; L Aravind; Steven P Gygi; Stevan R Hubbard; Miroslav Strnad; K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Anaerobic growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum via mixed-acid fermentation.

Authors:  Andrea Michel; Abigail Koch-Koerfges; Karin Krumbach; Melanie Brocker; Michael Bott
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distinct Nitrite and Nitric Oxide Physiologies in Escherichia coli and Shewanella oneidensis.

Authors:  Qiu Meng; Jianhua Yin; Miao Jin; Haichun Gao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Bacterial Proteasomes: Mechanistic and Functional Insights.

Authors:  Samuel H Becker; K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Analysis of the bacterial response to Ru(CO)3Cl(Glycinate) (CORM-3) and the inactivated compound identifies the role played by the ruthenium compound and reveals sulfur-containing species as a major target of CORM-3 action.

Authors:  Samantha McLean; Ronald Begg; Helen E Jesse; Brian E Mann; Guido Sanguinetti; Robert K Poole
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Do globins in microaerophilic Campylobacter jejuni confer nitrosative stress tolerance under oxygen limitation?

Authors:  Carlos Avila-Ramirez; Mariana Tinajero-Trejo; Kelly S Davidge; Claire E Monk; David J Kelly; Robert K Poole
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 7.  Bacterial Proteasomes.

Authors:  Jordan B Jastrab; K Heran Darwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 8.  Towards Understanding the Molecular Basis of Nitric Oxide-Regulated Group Behaviors in Pathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Dominique E Williams; Elizabeth M Boon
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 7.349

9.  Discovery and dissection of metabolic oscillations in the microaerobic nitric oxide response network of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jonathan L Robinson; Mark P Brynildsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A putative TetR regulator is involved in nitric oxide stress resistance in Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  M-C Boutrin; Y Yu; C Wang; W Aruni; Y Dou; L Shi; H M Fletcher
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.