| Literature DB >> 22114728 |
Alexandro Caruso1, Jörgen Rudolphi, Håkan Rydin.
Abstract
Biological edge effects are often assessed in high quality focal habitats that are negatively influenced by human-modified low quality matrix habitats. A deeper understanding of the possibilities for positive edge effects in matrix habitats bordering focal habitats (e.g. spillover effects) is, however, essential for enhancing landscape-level resilience to human alterations. We surveyed epixylic (dead wood inhabiting) forest-interior cryptogams (lichens, bryophytes, and fungi) associated with mature old-growth forests in 30 young managed Swedish boreal forest stands bordering a mature forest of high conservation value. In each young stand we registered species occurrences on coarse dead wood in transects 0-50 m from the border between stand types. We quantified the effect of distance from the mature forest on the occurrence of forest-interior species in the young stands, while accounting for local environment and propagule sources. For comparison we also surveyed epixylic open-habitat (associated with open forests) and generalist cryptogams. Species composition of epixylic cryptogams in young stands differed with distance from the mature forest: the frequency of occurrence of forest-interior species decreased with increasing distance whereas it increased for open-habitat species. Generalists were unaffected by distance. Epixylic, boreal forest-interior cryptogams do occur in matrix habitats such as clear-cuts. In addition, they are associated with the matrix edge because of a favourable microclimate closer to the mature forest on southern matrix edges. Retention and creation of dead wood in clear-cuts along the edges to focal habitats is a feasible way to enhance the long-term persistence of epixylic habitat specialists in fragmented landscapes. The proposed management measures should be performed in the whole stand as it matures, since microclimatic edge effects diminish as the matrix habitat matures. We argue that management that aims to increase habitat quality in matrix habitats bordering focal habitats should increase the probability of long-term persistence of habitat specialists.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22114728 PMCID: PMC3219701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Sampling design. Placement of the 50×50 m plot within the young forest stand at each study site.
Score statistics from randomized complete blocks PERMANOVA (permutational multivariate analysis of variance) of species composition along the distance from the mature forest.
| Source | df | MS | F |
| Pairwise comparisons ( |
| transect number (edge distance) | |||||
| Stand | 21 | 0.489 | 5.52 | <0.001 | |
| Edge distance | 7 | 0.134 | 1.51 | 0.033 | 1 ≠ 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; 2 ≠ 4 |
| Residual | 147 | 0.089 | |||
| Total | 175 |
*p = 0.05.
Figure 2Epixylic cryptogam species composition in young stands along the distance from the mature stand.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS) graph, where circles respresent transects (1–8) in Uppland (open) and Hälsingland (filled). Average values of individual species occupancy (arcsine squareroot transformed) in each transect number and each region were used in the calculations of ordination scores. Lines indicate the direction and strength (line length) of correlations (|r| ≥ 0.60) between ordination scores and explanatory variables (including transformed average occupancy values for individual species). L = lichen, B = bryophyte, F = fungus, O-H = open-habitat, F-I = forest-interior, G = generalist. Axis 1 and 2 explained 82 and 11% of the variance in the data, respectively.
Parameter estimates (Est.) in generalized linear mixed models for within-transect occupancy of at least one forest-interior, open-habitat or generalist cryptogam species.
| Variable | Forest-interior | Open-habitat | Generalist | |||||||||
| Est. | SE | df |
| Est. | SE | df |
| Est. | SE | df |
| |
| Intercept | −7.60 | 1.32 | 28 |
| −2.46 | 0.92 | 28 | 0.01 | −2.39 | 0.57 | 29 |
|
| Region | 1.01U | 0.48 | 28 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.42 | 28 | 0.98 | ||||
| Edge | ||||||||||||
| distance | −0.32 | 0.08 | 206 |
| 0.03 | 0.03 | 203 |
| ||||
| Proportion | ||||||||||||
| stumps | 4.69 | 0.86 | 203 |
| ||||||||
| Area | 0.90 | 0.25 | 206 |
| 0.26 | 0.14 | 209 | 0.06 | ||||
| Shade | 0.95 | 0.40 | 206 | 0.02 | −0.43 | 0.22 | 203 | 0.05 | ||||
| Decay | 0.07 | 0.50 | 203 | 0.89 | ||||||||
| Decay2 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 203 |
| ||||||||
| Region× | ||||||||||||
| edge dist. | 0.20 | 0.11 | 206 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 203 | 0.01 | ||||
| Prop. stu. x | ||||||||||||
| decay | −1.77 | 0.47 | 203 |
| ||||||||
Significant estimate followed by H or U denote higher probability of occurrence in Hälsingland or Uppland, respectively.
Area = log(Average substrate area).
*** = p<0.001.
Figure 3Interactions between explanatory variables.
Plots for effects of the interaction between region and distance from the mature forest (“short” = transect 1, and “long” = transect 8) on occupancy of a) forest-interior species, b) open-habitat species, and c) C. botrytes (open-habitat lichen). The plots are based on parameter estimates in generalized linear mixed models for the two variables and the intercept of the final model (following http://www.jeremydawson.co.uk/slopes.htm, accessed september 2010).