Literature DB >> 22113587

The role of family of origin in physicians referred to a CME course.

Charles P Samenow1, Scott T Yabiku, Marine Ghulyan, Betsy Williams, William Swiggart.   

Abstract

Few studies exist which look at psychological factors associated with physician sexual misconduct. In this study, we explore family dysfunction as a possible risk factor associated with physician sexual misconduct. Six hundred thirteen physicians referred to a continuing medical education (CME) course for sexual misconduct were administered the FACES-II survey, a validated and reliable measure of family dynamics. The survey was part of a self-learning activity. We collected data from February 2000 to February 2009. Participants were predominantly white, middle-aged males who represented the full range of medical specialties. Their results were compared against a sample of 177 physicians. The FACES-II is a self-report test that measures family of origin (the family in which one was raised) dynamics on two dimensions (1) flexibility, ranging from too flexible (chaotic) to not flexible enough (rigid) and (2) cohesion ranging from too close (enmeshed) to not close enough (disengaged). The most common family pattern observed among physicians accused of sexual misconduct was rigid flexibility paired with disengaged cohesion, indicative of unhealthy family functioning. This pattern was significantly different than the pattern observed in the comparison group. Physicians who engage in sexual misconduct are more likely to have family of origin dysfunction. Ethics is developmental and learned in one's family of origin. Family of origin dynamics may be one risk factor predisposing one to ethical violations. These findings have important implications for screening, education, and treatment across the medical education continuum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22113587     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-011-9171-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  12 in total

1.  This couldn't happen to me: boundary problems and sexual misconduct in the psychotherapy relationship.

Authors:  Donna M Norris; Thomas G Gutheil; Larry H Strasburger
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Problematic physicians: a comparison of personality profiles by offence type.

Authors:  Howard B Roback; Donald Strassberg; Richard J Iannelli; A J Reid Finlayson; Mark Blanco; Ron Neufeld
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Katie J Elkin; Matthew J Spittal; David J Elkin; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Some psychologic vulnerabilities of physicians.

Authors:  G E Vaillant; N C Sobowale; C McArthur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-08-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions.

Authors:  T G Gutheil; G O Gabbard
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  MMPI profiles of emotionally impaired physicians.

Authors:  D Dorr
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1981-04

7.  Post-termination sexual boundary violations.

Authors:  Glen O Gabbard
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2002-09

8.  A continuing medical education approach to improve sexual boundaries of physicians.

Authors:  W Anderson Spickard; William H Swiggart; Ginger T Manley; Charles P Samenow; David T Dodd
Journal:  Bull Menninger Clin       Date:  2008

9.  Physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses.

Authors:  C E Dehlendorf; S M Wolfe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Physician-patient sexual contact. Prevalence and problems.

Authors:  N K Gartrell; N Milliken; W H Goodson; S Thiemann; B Lo
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.