OBJECT: The aim of this work was to understand biophysical substrate underpinning contrast in diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) in white matter, using the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A theoretical relationship between the kurtosis function K and the CHARMED parameters, i.e., the restricted volume fraction RF and the axonal longitudinal diffusivity D was derived for the propagator used in the CHARMED model. Evidence for a similar correlation between these measures was then investigated in vivo across different WM regions in five healthy young subjects that underwent a CHARMED protocol at 3T. RESULTS: Our theoretical treatment shows that K has an increasing trend for both increasing RF values and increasing D. In vivo, a significant positive correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the kurtosis orthogonal to the fibre orientation K (⊥) and RF. A multilinear regression showed that K (⊥) values are better explained by a mixed contribution of both RF and D. CONCLUSIONS: The CHARMED model was used to understand whether and where DKI contrast can be explained in terms of the underlying axonal geometry. This work demonstrates that the information contained in DKI overlaps with the information extracted by CHARMED in areas of higher intra-voxel directional coherence.
OBJECT: The aim of this work was to understand biophysical substrate underpinning contrast in diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) in white matter, using the composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A theoretical relationship between the kurtosis function K and the CHARMED parameters, i.e., the restricted volume fraction RF and the axonal longitudinal diffusivity D was derived for the propagator used in the CHARMED model. Evidence for a similar correlation between these measures was then investigated in vivo across different WM regions in five healthy young subjects that underwent a CHARMED protocol at 3T. RESULTS: Our theoretical treatment shows that K has an increasing trend for both increasing RF values and increasing D. In vivo, a significant positive correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the kurtosis orthogonal to the fibre orientation K (⊥) and RF. A multilinear regression showed that K (⊥) values are better explained by a mixed contribution of both RF and D. CONCLUSIONS: The CHARMED model was used to understand whether and where DKI contrast can be explained in terms of the underlying axonal geometry. This work demonstrates that the information contained in DKI overlaps with the information extracted by CHARMED in areas of higher intra-voxel directional coherence.
Authors: R V Mulkern; H Gudbjartsson; C F Westin; H P Zengingonul; W Gartner; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; W Kyriakos; R Schwartz; D Holtzman; F A Jolesz; S E Maier Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Stephan E Maier; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Hatsuho Mamata; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert V Mulkern Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bennett A Landman; Jonathan A D Farrell; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Peter A Calabresi; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ali M Golestani; Laura Miles; James Babb; F Xavier Castellanos; Dolores Malaspina; Mariana Lazar Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Melissa Lamar; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Rebecca A Charlton; Douglas Dean; Deborah Little; Sean C Deoni Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 4.105