Literature DB >> 22112971

Analysis of HER-3, insulin growth factor-1, nuclear factor-kB and epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number in the prediction of clinical outcome for K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan-cetuximab.

M Scartozzi1, R Giampieri, E Maccaroni, A Mandolesi, L Giustini, R Silva, A Zaniboni, T Biscotti, S Biagetti, E Galizia, F Loupakis, A Falcone, I Bearzi, S Cascinu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of colorectal cancer patients does not benefit from the use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment although in the absence of a mutation of the K-RAS gene. Preliminary observations suggested that HER-3, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) and EGFR gene copy number (GCN) might identify patients not likely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. We tested the interaction between HER-3, IGF-1, NF-kB, EGFR GCN and K-RAS mutational analysis to verify the relative ability of these variables to identify a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from EGFR-targeted treatment among those harbouring a K-RAS wild-type status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected tumours from 168 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-cetuximab. K-RAS was assessed with direct sequencing, EGFR amplification was assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and HER-3, IGF-1 and NF-kB were assessed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: In patients with K-RAS wild-type tumours, the following molecular factors resulted independently associated with response rate: HER-3 [odds ratio (OR)=4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-13.6, P=0.02], IGF-1 (OR=4.2, 95% CI 2-10.2, P=0.003) and EGFR GCN (OR=4.1, 95% CI 1.9-26.2, P=0.04). These factors also independently correlated with overall survival as follows: HER-3 [hazard ratio (HR)=0.4, 95% CI 0.28-0.85, P=0.008], IGF-1 (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.76, P<0.0001) and EGFR GCN (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.22-0.89, P=0.04). DISCUSSION: We believe that our data may help further composing the molecular mosaic of EGFR-resistant tumours. The role of HER-3, IGF-1 and CISH EGFR GCN should be prospectively validated in clinical trials investigating anti-EGFR treatment strategies in colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112971     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  19 in total

1.  EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Peng-Fei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Xie; Ying-Xuan Chen; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-03-20

3.  Gene expression markers of efficacy and resistance to cetuximab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from CALGB 80203 (Alliance).

Authors:  Stephanie M Cushman; Chen Jiang; Ace J Hatch; Ivo Shterev; Alexander B Sibley; Donna Niedzwiecki; Alan P Venook; Kouros Owzar; Herbert I Hurwitz; Andrew B Nixon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Impact of EGFR and EGFR ligand expression on treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fee Klupp; Malte Sass; Frank Bergmann; Elias Khajeh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Matthias Hassenpflug; Arianeb Mehrabi; Yakup Kulu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Precision oncology in metastatic colorectal cancer - from biology to medicine.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Pietro Paolo Vitiello; Silvia Marsoni; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Livio Trusolino; Rene Bernards; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer: From Mechanism to Clinic.

Authors:  Qianyu Wang; Xiaofei Shen; Gang Chen; Junfeng Du
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Prospective study of a molecular selection profile for RAS wild type colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan-cetuximab.

Authors:  Riccardo Giampieri; Alessandra Mandolesi; Khaled M Abouelkhair; Cristian Loretelli; Michela Del Prete; Luca Faloppi; Bianconi Maristella; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim; Marina Scarpelli; Stefano Cascinu; Mario Scartozzi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  Biomarkers predicting resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.

Authors:  Jiang Liu; Jing Hu; Lei Cheng; Wei Ren; Mi Yang; Baorui Liu; Li Xie; Xiaoping Qian
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  EGFR gene copy number as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Jiang; Chunxiang Li; Fuyuan Li; Xishan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoonjin Kwak; Sumi Yun; Soo Kyung Nam; An Na Seo; Kyu Sang Lee; Eun Shin; Heung-Kwon Oh; Duck Woo Kim; Sung Bum Kang; Woo Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.