Literature DB >> 22112930

Are both the sensory and the affective dimensions of pain encoded in the face?

Miriam Kunz1, Stefan Lautenbacher, Nadine LeBlanc, Pierre Rainville.   

Abstract

The facial expression of pain plays a crucial role in pain communication and pain diagnostics. Despite its importance, it has remained unknown which dimensions of pain (sensory and/or affective) are encoded in the face. To answer this question, we used a well-established cognitive strategy (suggestions) to differentially modulate the sensory and affective dimensions of pain and investigate the effect of this manipulation on facial responses to experimental pain. Twenty-two subjects participated in the study. Their facial expressions, pain intensity, and unpleasantness ratings as well as skin conductance responses to tonic and phasic heat pain were assessed before and after suggestions directed toward increase in affective and sensory qualities of pain, respectively, were provided. Facial expressions were analyzed with the Facial Action Coding system. As expected, suggestions designed to increase the sensory dimension produced a selective increase in pain intensity ratings, whereas suggestions designed to increase pain affect produced increased unpleasantness ratings and elevated skin conductance responses. Furthermore, suggestions for either increased pain affect or pain sensation produced selective modulations in facial response patterns, with facial movements around the eyes mostly encoding sensory aspects, whereas movements of the eyebrows and of the upper lip were closely associated with the affective pain dimension. The facial expression of pain is a multidimensional response system that differentially encodes affective and sensory pain qualities. This differential encoding might have evolved to guarantee that the specific characteristics of one's pain experience are facially communicated, thereby ensuring adequate help and support from others.
Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22112930     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  27 in total

1.  Developing Improved Translational Models of Pain: A Role for the Behavioral Scientist.

Authors:  Sarah L Withey; David R Maguire; Brian D Kangas
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-03

2.  Pain distress: the negative emotion associated with procedures in ICU patients.

Authors:  Kathleen A Puntillo; Adeline Max; Jean-Francois Timsit; Stephane Ruckly; Gerald Chanques; Gemma Robleda; Ferran Roche-Campo; Jordi Mancebo; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Marcio Soares; Daniela C Ionescu; Ioana M Grintescu; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Katerina Rusinova; Radoslaw Owczuk; Ingrid Egerod; Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou; Maria Kyranou; Gavin M Joynt; Gaston Burghi; Ross C Freebairn; Kwok M Ho; Anne Kaarlola; Rik T Gerritsen; Jozef Kesecioglu; Miroslav M S Sulaj; Michelle Norrenberg; Dominique D Benoit; Myriam S G Seha; Akram Hennein; Fernando J Pereira; Julie S Benbenishty; Fekri Abroug; Andrew Aquilina; Julia R C Monte; Youzhong An; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An Automatic System for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring Based on Analyzing Data from Uni-, Bi-, and Multi-Modality.

Authors:  Ehsan Othman; Philipp Werner; Frerk Saxen; Marc-André Fiedler; Ayoub Al-Hamadi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  The sensory and affective components of pain: are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review.

Authors:  K Talbot; V J Madden; S L Jones; G L Moseley
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  The influence of communicative relations on facial responses to pain: does it matter who is watching?

Authors:  Anna Julia Karmann; Stefan Lautenbacher; Florian Bauer; Miriam Kunz
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Emotional conflict in a model modulates nociceptive processing in an onlooker: a laser-evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Matteo Martini; Elia Valentini; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Clinical and genetic characteristics for the Urofacial Syndrome (UFS).

Authors:  Yaqin Tu; Ping Yang; Jia Yang; Yuchen Xu; Fei Xiong; Qilin Yu; Weikuan Gu; Dinel Pond; Nancy Mendelsohn; Guus A M A Lachmeijer; Shu Zhang; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 8.  [Psychological approaches to pain in Germany. Review and outlook].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; H Flor; P Nilges
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Protease-activated receptor 2 activation is sufficient to induce the transition to a chronic pain state.

Authors:  Dipti V Tillu; Shayne N Hassler; Carolina C Burgos-Vega; Tammie L Quinn; Robert E Sorge; Gregory Dussor; Scott Boitano; Josef Vagner; Theodore J Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 10.  Pain management in patients with dementia.

Authors:  Wilco P Achterberg; Marjoleine J C Pieper; Annelore H van Dalen-Kok; Margot W M de Waal; Bettina S Husebo; Stefan Lautenbacher; Miriam Kunz; Erik J A Scherder; Anne Corbett
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.