Literature DB >> 22111918

The evolution of cranial form and function in theropod dinosaurs: insights from geometric morphometrics.

S L Brusatte1, M Sakamoto, S Montanari, W E H Harcourt Smith.   

Abstract

Theropod dinosaurs, an iconic clade of fossil species including Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor, developed a great diversity of body size, skull form and feeding habits over their 160+ million year evolutionary history. Here, we utilize geometric morphometrics to study broad patterns in theropod skull shape variation and compare the distribution of taxa in cranial morphospace (form) to both phylogeny and quantitative metrics of biting behaviour (function). We find that theropod skulls primarily differ in relative anteroposterior length and snout depth and to a lesser extent in orbit size and depth of the cheek region, and oviraptorosaurs deviate most strongly from the "typical" and ancestral theropod morphologies. Noncarnivorous taxa generally fall out in distinct regions of morphospace and exhibit greater overall disparity than carnivorous taxa, whereas large-bodied carnivores independently converge on the same region of morphospace. The distribution of taxa in morphospace is strongly correlated with phylogeny but only weakly correlated with functional biting behaviour. These results imply that phylogeny, not biting function, was the major determinant of theropod skull shape.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22111918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  14 in total

1.  Birds have paedomorphic dinosaur skulls.

Authors:  Bhart-Anjan S Bhullar; Jesús Marugán-Lobón; Fernando Racimo; Gabe S Bever; Timothy B Rowe; Mark A Norell; Arhat Abzhanov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Slow and steady: the evolution of cranial disparity in fossil and recent turtles.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Walter G Joyce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Morphological and functional diversity in therizinosaur claws and the implications for theropod claw evolution.

Authors:  Stephan Lautenschlager
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) inferred from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies.

Authors:  Case Vincent Miller; Michael Pittman; Xiaoli Wang; Xiaoting Zheng; Jen A Bright
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.364

5.  The good, the bad, and the ugly: the influence of skull reconstructions and intraspecific variability in studies of cranial morphometrics in theropods and Basal saurischians.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Oliver W M Rauhut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Lujiatun Psittacosaurids: understanding individual and taphonomic variation using 3D geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Brandon P Hedrick; Peter Dodson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Morphological and biomechanical disparity of crocodile-line archosaurs following the end-Triassic extinction.

Authors:  Thomas L Stubbs; Stephanie E Pierce; Emily J Rayfield; Philip S L Anderson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Still slow, but even steadier: an update on the evolution of turtle cranial disparity interpolating shapes along branches.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Eduardo Ascarrunz; Walter G Joyce
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Convergence and divergence in the evolution of cat skulls: temporal and spatial patterns of morphological diversity.

Authors:  Manabu Sakamoto; Marcello Ruta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cranial ontogenetic variation in early saurischians and the role of heterochrony in the diversification of predatory dinosaurs.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Brandon P Hedrick; Martin D Ezcurra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.