Literature DB >> 22111800

Computed tomography perfusion prognostic maps do not predict reversible and irreversible neurological dysfunction following reperfusion therapies.

Limin Zhao1, Kristian Barlinn, Asim K Bag, Maruthi Kesani, Luis F Cava, Clotilde Balucani, Anne W Alexandrov, Joseph A Horton, Damon E Patterson, Mark R Harrigan, Karen C Albright, Andrei V Alexandrov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the ability of commercially available computed tomography perfusion (CTP) prognostic maps software to identify reversibly and irreversibly damaged brain functions in the best case scenario: patients who achieved early and complete tissue reperfusion.
METHODS: Consecutive ischemic stroke patients who received reperfusion therapies, those with early (less than two-hours from treatment initiation) and complete Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade III or equivalent reperfusion were included in the analysis. Computed tomography perfusion prognostic maps were assigned as 'red,' or irreversible if cerebral blood volume declined below 2 ml/100 g and 'green,' or recoverable if the affected/unaffected mean transit time ratio was >1.45. Only patients with middle cerebral artery territory affected were included and subcomponents of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scale pre- and posttreatment were analyzed based on anatomical correlation of the affected CTP areas and corresponding neurological functions.
RESULTS: Among 109 consecutive patients who had intra-arterial reperfusion procedures, 16 (age 60 ± 17 years, 56% men, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 13 . 5, interquartile range 7-18) had pretreatment CTP and had early complete reperfusion. We identified 44 affected areas on CTP (red 12 (27%), green 32 (73%)) with corresponding measurable neurological deficits including aphasia, arm, face weakness, and inattention. Red areas correctly identified 5/12 (42%) of functions that did not recover despite early reperfusion. Green areas correctly identified 18/32 (56%) of functions that recover after early reperfusion (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.25-3.39, P = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: In-patients achieving early and complete reperfusion, pretreatment CTP prognostic maps were not predictive for irreversibly or reversibly lost neurologic functions.
© 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2011 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22111800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00681.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  4 in total

1.  Clinical use of computed tomographic perfusion for the diagnosis and prediction of lesion growth in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Branko N Huisa; William P Neil; Ronald Schrader; Marcel Maya; Benedict Pereira; Nhu T Bruce; Patrick D Lyden
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Assessment of intracranial collaterals on CT angiography in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  L L L Yeo; P Paliwal; H L Teoh; R C Seet; B P Chan; E Ting; N Venketasubramanian; W K Leow; B Wakerley; Y Kusama; R Rathakrishnan; V K Sharma
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Spatiotemporal dynamic simulation of acute perfusion/diffusion ischemic stroke lesions evolution: a pilot study derived from longitudinal MR patient data.

Authors:  Islem Rekik; Stéphanie Allassonnière; Stanley Durrleman; Trevor Carpenter; Joanna Wardlaw
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Characteristics of Misclassified CT Perfusion Ischemic Core in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Ralph R E G Geuskens; Jordi Borst; Marit Lucas; A M Merel Boers; Olvert A Berkhemer; Yvo B W E M Roos; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Charles B L M Majoie; Henk A Marquering
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.