Literature DB >> 22111641

Associations between women's subjective perceptions of daily occupations and life satisfaction, and the role of perceived control.

Carita Håkansson1, Cecilia Björkelund, Mona Eklund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: More knowledge is needed about the role of perceived control in the associations between different perceptions of daily occupations and positive health outcomes. The aim was to explore the associations between different subjective perceptions of daily occupations, in terms of occupational balance, occupational meaning, occupational value and satisfaction with occupations, and life satisfaction, and the role of perceived control in those associations.
METHODS: A questionnaire including questions about perceptions of daily occupations, perceived control and life satisfaction were answered by a random sample of 488 middle-aged Swedish women. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to test the associations between perceptions of daily occupations and life satisfaction, and the role of perceived control.
RESULTS: After adjustments for perceived control women who perceived a high level of satisfaction with work and leisure, occupational balance, occupational meaning and occupational value perceived greater life satisfaction than the other women. Perceived control was not significant in the model.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that occupational balance and occupational meaning were pivotal for the women's life satisfaction, but satisfaction with work and leisure, as well as perceived occupational value, was also of importance. The assumption that perceived control would have a role in the association between perceptions of occupations and life satisfaction was not confirmed. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: The results indicate that occupational therapists need to focus on occupational balance, occupational meaning, occupational value and satisfaction with work and leisure to promote positive health outcomes, in terms of life satisfaction, when working with middle-aged female clients.
© 2011 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal © 2011 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22111641     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00976.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  5 in total

1.  The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on occupational balance: A mixed method study of the experience of Australian occupational therapists.

Authors:  Tamara Tse; Ester Roberts; Jo Garvie; Emma Sutton; Adrienne Munro
Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 1.757

2.  The combination of psychosocial working conditions, occupational balance and sociodemographic characteristics and their associations with no or negligible stress symptoms among Swedish occupational therapists - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carita Håkansson; Annika Lexén
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Health-promoting factors in higher education for a sustainable working life - protocol for a multicenter longitudinal study.

Authors:  U Lindmark; I Ahlstrand; A Ekman; L Berg; L Hedén; J Källstrand; M Larsson; H Nunstedt; L Oxelmark; S Pennbrant; A Sundler; I Larsson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Rasch Analysis of the Norwegian Version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire in a Sample of Occupational Therapy Students.

Authors:  Tore Bonsaksen; Marte Ørud Lindstad; Carita Håkansson; Petra Wagman; Reinie Cordier
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 1.448

5.  The Gutenberg Health Study: measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire.

Authors:  Matthias Nuebling; Andreas Seidler; Susan Garthus-Niegel; Ute Latza; Mandy Wagner; Janice Hegewald; Falk Liebers; Sylvia Jankowiak; Isabella Zwiener; Philipp S Wild; Stephan Letzel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.