OBJECTIVES: The working population is aging and a shortage of workers is expected in the construction industry. As a consequence, it is considered necessary that construction workers extend their working life. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with construction workers' ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65. METHODS: In total, 5,610 construction workers that participated in the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey filled out questionnaires on demographics, work-related and health-related factors, and on the ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65. Logistic regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Older workers were more often able, but less willing, to continue working until the age of 65. Frequently using force, lower supervisor support, lower skill discretion, and the occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints were associated with both a lower ability and willingness to continue working. In addition, dangerous work, occasionally using force, working in awkward postures, lack of job autonomy, and reporting emotional exhaustion were associated with a lower ability to continue working, whereas working overtime was associated with a higher ability. Furthermore, low social support from colleagues was associated with a higher willingness. CONCLUSION: In addition to physical job demands, psychosocial job characteristics play a significant role in both the ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65 in construction workers. Moreover, preventing musculoskeletal complaints may support the ability and willingness to continue working, whereas preventing emotional exhaustion is relevant for the ability to continue working.
OBJECTIVES: The working population is aging and a shortage of workers is expected in the construction industry. As a consequence, it is considered necessary that construction workers extend their working life. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with construction workers' ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65. METHODS: In total, 5,610 construction workers that participated in the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey filled out questionnaires on demographics, work-related and health-related factors, and on the ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65. Logistic regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Older workers were more often able, but less willing, to continue working until the age of 65. Frequently using force, lower supervisor support, lower skill discretion, and the occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints were associated with both a lower ability and willingness to continue working. In addition, dangerous work, occasionally using force, working in awkward postures, lack of job autonomy, and reporting emotional exhaustion were associated with a lower ability to continue working, whereas working overtime was associated with a higher ability. Furthermore, low social support from colleagues was associated with a higher willingness. CONCLUSION: In addition to physical job demands, psychosocial job characteristics play a significant role in both the ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65 in construction workers. Moreover, preventing musculoskeletal complaints may support the ability and willingness to continue working, whereas preventing emotional exhaustion is relevant for the ability to continue working.
Authors: Tilja van den Berg; Merel Schuring; Mauricio Avendano; Johan Mackenbach; Alex Burdorf Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Julitta S Boschman; Henk F van der Molen; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Johannes Siegrist; Morten Wahrendorf; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Hendrik Jürges; Axel Börsch-Supan Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Tarja Heponiemi; Anne Kouvonen; Jukka Vänskä; Hannu Halila; Timo Sinervo; Mika Kivimäki; Marko Elovainio Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 1.611
Authors: Stephen A Stansfeld; Ewan Carr; Melanie Smuk; Charlotte Clark; Emily Murray; Nicola Shelton; Jenny Head Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julitta S Boschman; Henk F van der Molen; Judith K Sluiter; Monique Hw Frings-Dresen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Karen M Oude Hengel; Birgitte M Blatter; Catelijne I Joling; Allard J van der Beek; Paulien M Bongers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Suzanne L Merkus; Lars-Kristian Lunde; Markus Koch; Morten Wærsted; Stein Knardahl; Kaj Bo Veiersted Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 3.015