Literature DB >> 22109082

Out of sight, out of mind: including group quarters residents with household residents can change what we know about working-age people with disabilities.

David Stapleton1, Todd Honeycutt, Bruce Schechter.   

Abstract

Information about residents of institutional and noninstitutional group quarters (GQ), particularly those with disabilities, has been limited by gaps in survey data, and statistics based on data that exclude some or all GQ residents are biased as estimates of total population statistics. We used the 2006 and 2007 American Community Survey (ACS) to identify the distribution of working-age populations with and without disabilities by major residence type and to assess the sensitivity of disability statistics to GQ residence. Our findings show that (1) of those with disabilities, about 1 in 13 males and 1 in 33 females live in GQ; (2) GQ rates are higher for individuals reporting mental, self-care, or go-outside-the-home disabilities than for those reporting sensory, physical, or employment disabilities; (3) younger males with disabilities are more likely to reside there, particularly at institutional GQ, reflecting their relatively high incarceration rate; (4) individuals with and without disabilities who are black, American Indian, were never married, or have less than a high school education have higher GQ residence rates; (5) 40% of male and 62% of female GQ residents have a disability; (6) adding GQ residents to household residents increases estimated disability prevalence for males by 6%, and the estimated difference between disability prevalence rates by gender nearly disappears; and (7) inclusion of the GQ population substantially lowers employment rate estimates for young males, blacks, and American Indians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22109082     DOI: 10.1007/s13524-011-0071-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  4 in total

1.  Self-reported work-limitation data: what they can and cannot tell us.

Authors:  Richard V Burkhauser; Mary C Daly; Andrew J Houtenville; Nigar Nargis
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-08

2.  Three strikes and you're out: demographic analysis of mandatory prison sentencing.

Authors:  C P Schmertmann; A A Amankwaa; R D Long
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

3.  The disablement process.

Authors:  L M Verbrugge; A M Jette
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Adults with autism living at home or in non-family settings: positive and negative aspects of residential status.

Authors:  M W Krauss; M M Seltzer; H T Jacobson
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2005-02
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  How do working-age people with disabilities spend their time? New evidence from the American Time Use Survey.

Authors:  Priyanka Anand; Yonatan Ben-Shalom
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-12

2.  Explaining the increasing disability prevalence among mid-life US adults, 2002 to 2016.

Authors:  Anna Zajacova; Jennifer Karas Montez
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Racial disparities in health conditions among prisoners compared with the general population.

Authors:  Katherine M Nowotny; Richard G Rogers; Jason D Boardman
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.