Literature DB >> 22108395

Physical restraints in the emergency department and attendance at subsequent outpatient psychiatric treatment.

Glenn W Currier1, Patrick Walsh, David Lawrence.   

Abstract

While an estimated 8.5% of psychiatric patients treated in emergency departments require physical restraint, the impact of restraint on attendance at post-discharge outpatient psychiatric appointments has not been investigated. This study evaluated two groups of patients aged 18 or over: 1) 67 individuals who presented voluntarily or involuntarily (being brought in by the police) to the emergency department and who were physically restrained in the course of clinical care, and 2) a comparative group of 84 individuals who presented involuntarily but were not restrained. Perception of quality of care, recollection of the restraint episode, and attendance at follow-up outpatient appointments were compared between these two groups. Of the 151 patients, 33% were from minorities, 45% were female, and the median age was 36 years (range of 18 to 77 years). Both minority race and use of physical restraints were related to less frequent attendance at the prescribed outpatient psychiatric appointment, based on multivariate logistic regression (odds ratios of 0.40 and 0.38, respectively). Although physical restraint may sometimes be necessary to manage aggression and agitation in the emergency department, being restrained appears to be associated with decreased likelihood of attending prescribed outpatient follow-up mental health treatment. Clinicians should consider alternatives to physical restraints whenever possible to minimize impact on treatment compliance after discharge from the emergency department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22108395     DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000407961.42228.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of Violence and Aggression in Emergency Environment; a Narrative Review of 200 Related Articles.

Authors:  Maryam Ziaei; Ali Massoudifar; Ali Rajabpour-Sanati; Ali-Mohammad Pourbagher-Shahri; Ali Abdolrazaghnejad
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-29

Review 2.  Health service use and costs associated with aggressiveness or agitation and containment in adult psychiatric care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Maria Rubio-Valera; Juan V Luciano; José Miguel Ortiz; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Alfredo Gracia; Antoni Serrano-Blanco
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Use of the Safewards Model in healthcare services: a mixed-method scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Marie Gerdtz; Catherine Daniel; Rebecca Jarden; Suzanne Kapp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Patient and Provider Perspectives on Emergency Department Care Experiences among People with Mental Health Concerns.

Authors:  Carolina Navas; Laura Wells; Susan A Bartels; Melanie Walker
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 5.  Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.