PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations and to suggest adjusted constants for implantation of ultraviolet light-adjustable IOLs. SETTING: Center for Vision Science, Ruhr University Eye Clinic, Bochum, Germany. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Eyes with a visually significant cataract that had phacoemulsification with implantation of a light-adjustable IOL were evaluated. IOLMaster measurements were performed before phacoemulsification and IOL implantation and 4 weeks after surgery before the first adjustment of the IOL. The difference in the expected refraction and estimation error was studied. RESULTS: The study evaluated 125 eyes. Using the surgical constants provided by the manufacturer of the light-adjustable IOL, the SRK/T formula gave a more hyperopic refraction than the Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 formulas. The mean error of prediction was 0.93 diopter (D) ± 0.69 (SD), 0.91 ± 0.63 D, and 0.86 ± 0.65 D, respectively. The corresponding mean absolute error of prediction was 0.98 ± 0.61 D, 0.93 ± 0.61 D, and 0.90 ± 0.59 D, respectively. With optimized constants for the formulas, the mean error of prediction was 0.00 ± 0.63 D for Hoffer Q, 0.00 ± 0.64 D for Holladay 1, and 0.00 ± 0.66 D for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: The expected refraction after phacoemulsification and implantation of a light-adjustable IOL toward the hyperopic side of the desired refraction could be considered when using the optimized constants for all formulas.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations and to suggest adjusted constants for implantation of ultraviolet light-adjustable IOLs. SETTING: Center for Vision Science, Ruhr University Eye Clinic, Bochum, Germany. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Eyes with a visually significant cataract that had phacoemulsification with implantation of a light-adjustable IOL were evaluated. IOLMaster measurements were performed before phacoemulsification and IOL implantation and 4 weeks after surgery before the first adjustment of the IOL. The difference in the expected refraction and estimation error was studied. RESULTS: The study evaluated 125 eyes. Using the surgical constants provided by the manufacturer of the light-adjustable IOL, the SRK/T formula gave a more hyperopic refraction than the Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 formulas. The mean error of prediction was 0.93 diopter (D) ± 0.69 (SD), 0.91 ± 0.63 D, and 0.86 ± 0.65 D, respectively. The corresponding mean absolute error of prediction was 0.98 ± 0.61 D, 0.93 ± 0.61 D, and 0.90 ± 0.59 D, respectively. With optimized constants for the formulas, the mean error of prediction was 0.00 ± 0.63 D for Hoffer Q, 0.00 ± 0.64 D for Holladay 1, and 0.00 ± 0.66 D for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: The expected refraction after phacoemulsification and implantation of a light-adjustable IOL toward the hyperopic side of the desired refraction could be considered when using the optimized constants for all formulas.
Authors: Gustavo Bonfadini; John G Ladas; Hamilton Moreira; Mauro Campos; Mario Matthaei; Beatriz Muñoz; Kim Pratzer; Albert S Jun Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 12.079