Different baseline characteristics and different outcomes of HIV-infected patients receiving HAART through clinical trials compared with routine care in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been established through clinical trials (CTs). However, selection bias and differences can limit their applicability to the general population.
METHODS: All treatment-naive HIV-infected patients who began ART in routine care (RC) between 2000 and 2008 were compared with all patients who initiated ART through a CT in terms of incidence of virological failure (VF), increase in CD4(+) count, mortality rate, and loss to follow-up (LTFU).
RESULTS: At baseline, the RC group had less years of education, higher unemployment rate, higher proportion of females (14.2 vs. 5.7%; P < 0.01), lower median CD4(+) (97 vs. 158 cells/μL; P < 0.01), and lower proportion of patients with hemoglobin >12 g/dL (74 vs. 83%, P = 0.04). VF at week 48 was less frequent in the CT compared with the RC group (1.8% vs. 6.21%, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, participation in CT [odds ratio (OR): 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04 to 0.91, P = 0.03], hemoglobin >12 g/dL (OR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.89, P = 0.03), and receiving an optimal highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.52, P < 0.01) remained associated with lower risk of VF. All cause mortality was 0.017 (95% CI: 0.002 to 0.122) versus 0.094 (95% CI: 0.053 to 0.17) deaths per 1000 person-days in the CT group and in the RC group, respectively (P = 0.05). No differences were found in the proportion of patients LTFU.
CONCLUSIONS: Receiving ART through CT was associated with lower probability of VF, lower mortality (probably related to less severe clinical characteristics at baseline), and similar rates of LTFU than RC.