Literature DB >> 22106825

Speech motor skill and stuttering.

Aravind Kumar Namasivayam1, Pascal van Lieshout.   

Abstract

The authors review converging lines of evidence from behavioral, kinematic, and neuroimaging data that point to limitations in speech motor skills in people who stutter (PWS). From their review, they conclude that PWS differ from those who do not in terms of their ability to improve with practice and retain practiced changes in the long term, and that they are less efficient and less flexible in their adaptation to lower (motor) and higher (cognitive-linguistic) order requirements that impact on speech motor functions. These findings in general provide empirical support for the position that PWS may occupy the low end of the speech motor skill continuum as argued in the Speech Motor Skills approach (Van Lieshout, Hulstijn, & Peters, 2004).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22106825     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.628347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  21 in total

1.  Anticipatory coarticulation and stability of speech in typically fluent speakers and people who stutter.

Authors:  Stefan A Frisch; Nathan Maxfield; Alissa Belmont
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Coupling dynamics in speech gestures: amplitude and rate influences.

Authors:  Pascal H H M van Lieshout
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The frontal aslant tract (FAT) and its role in speech, language and executive function.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Dea Garic; Paulo Graziano; Pascale Tremblay
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The effect of emotion on articulation rate in persistence and recovery of childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Aysu Erdemir; Tedra A Walden; Caswell M Jefferson; Dahye Choi; Robin M Jones
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  The Impact of Social-Cognitive Stress on Speech Variability, Determinism, and Stability in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.

Authors:  Eric S Jackson; Mark Tiede; Deryk Beal; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Speech Movement Variability in People Who Stutter: A Vocal Tract Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Charlotte E E Wiltshire; Mark Chiew; Jennifer Chesters; Máiréad P Healy; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.