| Literature DB >> 22106748 |
Mohammad Abu Sayem1, Shaikh Meshbahuddin Ahmad, Rokeya Sultana Rekha, Protim Sarker, Birgitta Agerberth, Kaisar Ali Talukder, Rubhana Raqib.
Abstract
Shigella dysenteriae type 1 causes devastating epidemics in developing countries with high case-fatality rates in all age-groups. The aim of the study was to compare host immune responses to epidemic (T2218) and endemic strains of S. dysenteriae type 1. Shigellacidal activity of serum from rabbits immunized with epidemic or endemic strains, S. dysenteriae type 1-infected patients, and healthy adult controls from Shigella-endemic and non-endemic regions was measured. Immunogenic cross-reactivity of antibodies against Shigella antigens was evaluated by Western blot analysis. Oxidative burst and phagocytic responses of monocytes and neutrophils to selected S. dysenteriae type 1 strains were assessed by flow cytometry. Rabbit antisera against epidemic strain were less effective in killing heterologous bacteria compared to endemic antisera (p=0.0002). Patients showed an increased serum shigellacidal response after two weeks of onset of diarrhoea compared to the acute stage (3-4 days after onset) against their respective homologous strains; the response against T2218 and heterologous endemic S. dysenteriae type 1 strains was not significant. The serum shigellacidal response against all the S. dysenteriae type 1 strains was similar among healthy controls from endemic and non-endemic regions and was comparable with the acute stage response by patients. Compared to endemic strains of S. dysenteriae type 1, T2218 was significantly resistant to phagocytosis by both monocytes and neutrophils. No obvious differences were obtained in the induction of oxidative burst activity and cathelicidin-mediated killing. Cross-reactivity of antibody against antigens present in the epidemic and endemic strains showed some differences in protein/peptide complexity and intensity by Western blot analysis. In summary, epidemic T2218 strain was more resistant to antibody-mediated defenses, namely phagocytosis and shigellacidal activity, compared to endemic S. dysenteriae type 1 strains. Part of this variation may be attributed to the differential complexity of protein/peptide antigens.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22106748 PMCID: PMC3225104 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i5.8896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
List of isolates used
| Isolate | Place of isolation | Year | Assays |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidemic | |||
| T2218 | Teknaf, Bangladesh | 1985 | All |
| Endemic | |||
| 191316 | Dhaka Hospital, icddr,b | 2002 | Phagocytosis, oxidative burst, raising antisera, and Western blot analysis |
| Endemic | Dhaka Hospital, icddr,b | 2002 | Shigellacidal assay with sera of patients |
| 192789 | |||
| 179370 | |||
| 179268 | |||
| 178042 | |||
| 184223 | |||
| 175560 | |||
| 191309 | |||
| 191325 | |||
| Endemic | |||
| 191316 | Dhaka Hospital, icddr,b | 2002 | Shigellacidal assay with healthy adult and rabbit antisera |
| 191309 | |||
| 191325 |
Comparison of shigellacidal activity of rabbit antisera against epidemic and endemic Shigella dysenteriae type 1 strains in various combinations by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis
| Combination | 95% CI | Log-rank test | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnSd1 + anti-EnSd1 | 0.19-0.52 | ||
| EpSd1 + anti-EpSd1 | 0.22-0.64 | 1.17 | 0.28 |
| EnSd1 + anti-EnSd1 | 0.19-0.52 | ||
| EnSd1 + anti-EpSd1 | 1.0-1.0 | 20.1 | 0.00001 |
| EpSd1 + anti-EnSd1 | 0.22-0.64 | ||
| EpSd1 + anti-EpSd1 | 0.22-0.64 | 0 | 1.0 |
| EnSd1 + anti-EpSd1 | 1.0-1.0 | ||
| EpSd1 + anti-EpSd1 | 0.22-0.64 | 14.25 | 0.0002 |
| EnSd1 + anti-EnSd1 | 0.19-0.52 | ||
| EpSd1 + anti-EnSd1 | 0.22-0.64 | 1.17 | 0.28 |
Data (1/dilution of antisera) given as 95% CI of means. Data shown here are for one endemic strain only (#191316).
CI=Confidence interval;
EnSd1=Endemic Shigella dysenteriae type 1 strain; EpSd1=Epidemic S. dysenteriae type 1 strain;
anti-EnSd1=Rabbit antisera against endemic S. dysenteriae type 1;
anti-EpSd1 Rabbit antisera against epidemic S. dysenteriae type 1
Fig. 1.Serum shigellacidal titre of Shigella infected patients (day 1, 11, and 30, n=8), endemic healthy adult controls (EHC, n=15), and non-endemic healthy adult controls from Sweden (SC, n=5) against endemic homologous (closed circles), endemic heterologous (open circle), and epidemic strain (closed triangles1 of Shigella dysenteriae type 1
Fig. 2.Comparison by Kaplan-Meier analysis of shigellacidal response of rabbit anti-EnSd1 (191316) and anti-Epsd1 (T2218) antisera against 191316 and T2218 strains in different combinations
Fig. 4.Western blot analysis of sonicated Shigela bacterial lysate using rabbit antisera raised against endemic (EnSd1, 191316) and epidemic (EpSd1, T2218) strains