Literature DB >> 22106320

Predicting the risk of perioperative mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a novel scoring system.

Raghunandan Venkat1, Milo A Puhan, Richard D Schulick, John L Cameron, Frederic E Eckhauser, Michael A Choti, Martin A Makary, Timothy M Pawlik, Nita Ahuja, Barish H Edil, Christopher L Wolfgang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a risk score to predict the 30- and 90-day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy on the basis of preoperative risk factors in a high-volume program.
DESIGN: Data from a prospectively maintained institutional database were collected. In a random subset of 70% of patients (training cohort), multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a simple integer score, which was then validated in the remaining 30% of patients (validation cohort). Discrimination and calibration of the score were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study comprised 1976 patients in a prospectively maintained institutional database who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy between 1998 and 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 30- and 90-day mortality.
RESULTS: In the training cohort, age, male sex, preoperative serum albumin level, tumor size, total pancreatectomy, and a high Charlson index predicted 90-day mortality (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85), whereas all these factors except Charlson index also predicted 30-day mortality (0.79; 0.68-0.89). On validation, the predicted and observed risks were not significantly different for 30-day (1.4% vs 1.0%; P = .62) and 90-day (3.8% vs 3.4%; P = .87) mortality. Both scores maintained good discrimination (for 30-day mortality, area under the curve, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95; and for 90-day mortality, 0.73; 0.62-0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk scores accurately predicted 30- and 90-day mortality after pancreatectomy. They may help identify and counsel high-risk patients, support and calculate net benefits of therapeutic decisions, and control for selection bias in observational studies as propensity scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22106320     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  18 in total

1.  External assessment of the Early Mortality Risk Score in patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; David Petermann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Niccolò Napoli; Francesca Costa; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Francesca Menonna; Sara Iacopi; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; A James Moser; Brian A Boone; David L Bartlett; Mazen Zenati; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy without suturing the pancreas.

Authors:  Nermin Halkic; Kosuke Kobayashi; Takashi Kokudo; Luca Di Mare; Takamune Yamaguchi; Hiroki Kudo; Nicolas Demartines; Emilie Uldry
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  [A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].

Authors:  Rong Liu; Guo-Dong Zhao; Wen-Bo Tang; Ke-di Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Ming-Gen Hu; Cheng-Gang Li; Xiang-Long Tan; Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-02-20

6.  Severe nutritional risk predicts decreased long-term survival in geriatric patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign disease.

Authors:  Dominic E Sanford; Angela M Sanford; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Early hospital readmission for gastrointestinal-related complications predicts long-term mortality after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Vicente Valero; John L Cameron; Frederic E Eckhauser; Kenzo Hirose; Martin A Makary; Timothy M Pawlik; Nita Ahuja; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Jiang-Zhi Chen; Qian Zhan; Xia-Xing Deng; Bai-Yong Shen; Cheng-Hong Peng; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death.

Authors:  Sowmya Narayanan; Allison N Martin; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abigail E Vallance; Alastair L Young; Christian Macutkiewicz; Keith J Roberts; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.