Literature DB >> 22106248

Reduced risk of medical morbidity and mortality in patients selected for laparoscopic colorectal resection in England: a population-based study.

Ravikrishna Mamidanna1, Elaine M Burns, Alex Bottle, Paul Aylin, Christopher Stonell, George B Hanna, Omar Faiz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the occurrence of significant medical complications following elective colorectal resection and investigate potential differences in medical morbidity following open and minimal access colorectal surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics, which is a prospectively maintained national database.
SETTING: All patients undergoing colorectal resection in National Health Service trusts in England. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing elective or planned surgery between April 2001 and March 2008. INTERVENTION: Colorectal resection for benign and malignant diagnoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and morbidity at 30 days and 1 year following elective colorectal resection.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight thousand seven hundred thirty-five elective colorectal resections were identified between the study dates. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 3.4% and 1.7% following conventional and laparoscopic surgery, respectively (P < .001). Overall, the 30-day postoperative medical morbidity rate was 14.6%. Use of the minimal access approach demonstrated a significant reduction in total morbidity risk at 30 days (odds ratio, 0.79; P < .001) and 365 days (odds ratio, 0.81; P < .001) following case-mix adjustment. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that cardiorespiratory complications and venous thromboembolism occurred less frequently during the index admission and up to 1 year following minimal access surgery when compared with the conventional approach (P < .049).
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, patients selected for laparoscopic colorectal resection were associated with lower risk of mortality as well as reduced cardiorespiratory and venous thromboembolic risk than those undergoing open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22106248     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  30 in total

1.  [Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality].

Authors:  J Hardt; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; S Benz; K Ludwig; J Kalff; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic colectomy: the view from the United kingdom.

Authors:  Nigel Mark Bagnall; Omar Faiz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center.

Authors:  Diego Cuccurullo; Felice Pirozzi; Antonio Sciuto; Umberto Bracale; Camillo La Barbera; Francesco Galante; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients.

Authors:  Neel Maria Helvind; Jens Ravn Eriksen; Anders Mogensen; Buket Tas; Jesper Olsen; Mads Bundgaard; Henrik Loft Jakobsen; Ismail Gögenür
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country.

Authors:  Pierre-Anthony Leake; Kristen Pitzul; Patrick O Roberts; Joseph M Plummer
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-27

6.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.

Authors:  Daniel P Nussbaum; Paul J Speicher; Asvin M Ganapathi; Brian R Englum; Jeffrey E Keenan; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; A Chiappetta; G Giacomazzo; A Barina; N Gennaro; M Rebonato; D Nitti; M Saugo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  National outcomes and uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in England.

Authors:  Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Alex M Almoudaris; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Omar Faiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients.

Authors:  Riccardo A Audisio; Demetris Papamichael
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.