Literature DB >> 22105989

Improving stroke alert response time: applying quality improvement methodology to the inpatient neurologic emergency.

Ethan Cumbler1, Rebekah Zaemisch, Alexandra Graves, Kerry Brega, William Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke often leaves its victims with devastating disabilities if not treated promptly. Guidelines recommend that brain imaging be obtained within 25 minutes, yet this benchmark is rarely achieved for the in-hospital stroke.
PURPOSE: To reduce time to evaluation for strokes occurring in patients already hospitalized, through systematic analysis of current processes and application of standardized quality improvement methodology.
METHODS: Improving the quality of care for in-hospital stroke patients involved 4 key steps: (1) creation of a detailed process map to identify inefficiencies in the current process for identifying and treating hospitalized stroke patients, (2) development of an optimized care pathway, (3) implementation of a checklist of optimal practices for the acute stroke response team and nursing staff, and (4) real-time feedback. Time from stroke alert to initiation of computed tomography (CT) scan was prospectively tracked for the 6-month period prior to intervention. After a 3-month interval for intervention roll-out, the response times for the pre-intervention period were compared to a 6-month post-intervention evaluation period.
RESULTS: Pre-intervention median inpatient stroke alert-to-CT time was 69.0 minutes, with 19% meeting the goal of 25 minutes from alert to CT time. Post-intervention median inpatient stroke alert-to-CT time was reduced to 29.5 minutes, with 32% at goal (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This inpatient stroke alert quality improvement initiative decreased median inpatient alert-to-CT time by 57%, and demonstrated that speed of in-hospital stroke evaluation can be improved through systematic application of quality improvement principles.
Copyright © 2011 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22105989     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  6 in total

1.  Thrombolytic treatment for in-hospital ischemic strokes in United States.

Authors:  Tenbit Emiru; Malik M Adil; M Fareed K Suri; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Ethan Cumbler
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-07

3.  Endovascular treatment outcomes using the Stroke Triage Education, Procedure Standardization, and Technology (STEPS-T) program.

Authors:  Ameer E Hassan; Christina Sanchez; Angela N Johnson
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Risk profile and treatment options of acute ischemic in-hospital stroke.

Authors:  Kolja Schürmann; Omid Nikoubashman; Björn Falkenburger; Simone C Tauber; Martin Wiesmann; Jörg B Schulz; Arno Reich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Inpatient Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Andrew R Pines; Devika M Das; Shubhang K Bhatt; Harn J Shiue; Sara Dawit; Vanesa K Vanderhye; Kara A Sands
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-12-10

6.  Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Variability of Emergency Physician Opioid Analgesic Prescribing.

Authors:  John H Burton; Jason A Hoppe; Jeff M Echternach; Justin M Rodgers; Michael Donato
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.