BACKGROUND: Identifying adverse events and near misses is essential to improving safety in the health care system. Patients are capable of reliably identifying and reporting adverse events. The effect of a patient safety reporting system used by families of pediatric inpatients on reporting of adverse events by health care providers has not previously been investigated. METHODS: Between Nov. 1, 2008, and Nov. 30, 2009, families of children discharged from a single ward of British Columbia's Children's Hospital were asked to respond to a questionnaire about adverse events and near misses during the hospital stay. Rates of reporting by health care providers for this period were compared with rates for the previous year. Family reports for specific incidents were matched with reports by health care providers to determine overlap. RESULTS: A total of 544 familes responded to the questionnaire. The estimated absolute increase in reports by health care providers per 100 admissions was 0.5% (95% confidence interval -1.8% to 2.7%). A total of 321 events were identified in 201 of the 544 family reports. Of these, 153 (48%) were determined to represent legitimate patient safety concerns. Only 8 (2.5%) of the adverse events reported by families were also reported by health care providers. INTERPRETATION: The introduction of a family-based system for reporting adverse events involving pediatric inpatients, administered at the time of discharge, did not change rates of reporting of adverse events and near misses by health care providers. Most reports submitted by families were not duplicated in the reporting system for health care providers, which suggests that families and staff members view safety-related events differently. However, almost half of the family reports represented legitimate patient safety concerns. Families appeared capable of providing valuable information for improving the safety of pediatric inpatients.
BACKGROUND: Identifying adverse events and near misses is essential to improving safety in the health care system. Patients are capable of reliably identifying and reporting adverse events. The effect of a patient safety reporting system used by families of pediatric inpatients on reporting of adverse events by health care providers has not previously been investigated. METHODS: Between Nov. 1, 2008, and Nov. 30, 2009, families of children discharged from a single ward of British Columbia's Children's Hospital were asked to respond to a questionnaire about adverse events and near misses during the hospital stay. Rates of reporting by health care providers for this period were compared with rates for the previous year. Family reports for specific incidents were matched with reports by health care providers to determine overlap. RESULTS: A total of 544 familes responded to the questionnaire. The estimated absolute increase in reports by health care providers per 100 admissions was 0.5% (95% confidence interval -1.8% to 2.7%). A total of 321 events were identified in 201 of the 544 family reports. Of these, 153 (48%) were determined to represent legitimate patient safety concerns. Only 8 (2.5%) of the adverse events reported by families were also reported by health care providers. INTERPRETATION: The introduction of a family-based system for reporting adverse events involving pediatric inpatients, administered at the time of discharge, did not change rates of reporting of adverse events and near misses by health care providers. Most reports submitted by families were not duplicated in the reporting system for health care providers, which suggests that families and staff members view safety-related events differently. However, almost half of the family reports represented legitimate patient safety concerns. Families appeared capable of providing valuable information for improving the safety of pediatric inpatients.
Authors: Saul N Weingart; Jessica Price; Deborah Duncombe; Maureen Connor; Karen Sommer; Karen A Conley; Barbara E Bierer; Patricia Reid Ponte Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2007-02
Authors: James M Naessens; Claudia R Campbell; Jeanne M Huddleston; Bjorn P Berg; John J Lefante; Arthur R Williams; Richard A Culbertson Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Joel S Weissman; Eric C Schneider; Saul N Weingart; Arnold M Epstein; Joann David-Kasdan; Sandra Feibelmann; Catherine L Annas; Nancy Ridley; Leslie Kirle; Constantine Gatsonis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Barrett T Kitch; Jeffrey B Cooper; Warren M Zapol; Jessica E Marder; Andrew Karson; Matt Hutter; Eric G Campbell Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2008-10
Authors: G Ross Baker; Peter G Norton; Virginia Flintoft; Régis Blais; Adalsteinn Brown; Jafna Cox; Ed Etchells; William A Ghali; Philip Hébert; Sumit R Majumdar; Maeve O'Beirne; Luz Palacios-Derflingher; Robert J Reid; Sam Sheps; Robyn Tamblyn Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-05-25 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Alisa Khan; Stephannie L Furtak; Patrice Melvin; Jayne E Rogers; Mark A Schuster; Christopher P Landrigan Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Alisa Khan; Maitreya Coffey; Katherine P Litterer; Jennifer D Baird; Stephannie L Furtak; Briana M Garcia; Michele A Ashland; Sharon Calaman; Nicholas C Kuzma; Jennifer K O'Toole; Aarti Patel; Glenn Rosenbluth; Lauren A Destino; Jennifer L Everhart; Brian P Good; Jennifer H Hepps; Anuj K Dalal; Stuart R Lipsitz; Catherine S Yoon; Katherine R Zigmont; Rajendu Srivastava; Amy J Starmer; Theodore C Sectish; Nancy D Spector; Daniel C West; Christopher P Landrigan; Brenda K Allair; Claire Alminde; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Marisa Atsatt; Megan E Aylor; James F Bale; Dorene Balmer; Kevin T Barton; Carolyn Beck; Zia Bismilla; Rebecca L Blankenburg; Debra Chandler; Amanda Choudhary; Eileen Christensen; Sally Coghlan-McDonald; F Sessions Cole; Elizabeth Corless; Sharon Cray; Roxi Da Silva; Devesh Dahale; Benard Dreyer; Amanda S Growdon; LeAnn Gubler; Amy Guiot; Roben Harris; Helen Haskell; Irene Kocolas; Elizabeth Kruvand; Michele Marie Lane; Kathleen Langrish; Christy J W Ledford; Kheyandra Lewis; Joseph O Lopreiato; Christopher G Maloney; Amanda Mangan; Peggy Markle; Fernando Mendoza; Dale Ann Micalizzi; Vineeta Mittal; Maria Obermeyer; Katherine A O'Donnell; Mary Ottolini; Shilpa J Patel; Rita Pickler; Jayne Elizabeth Rogers; Lee M Sanders; Kimberly Sauder; Samir S Shah; Meesha Sharma; Arabella Simpkin; Anupama Subramony; E Douglas Thompson; Laura Trueman; Tanner Trujillo; Michael P Turmelle; Cindy Warnick; Chelsea Welch; Andrew J White; Matthew F Wien; Ariel S Winn; Stephanie Wintch; Michael Wolf; H Shonna Yin; Clifton E Yu Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Victoria P Rajamanickam; Pascale Carayon; Michelle M Kelly; Tosha B Wetterneck; Paul J Rathouz; Roger L Brown Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jason M Etchegaray; Madelene J Ottosen; Aitebureme Aigbe; Emily Sedlock; William M Sage; Sigall K Bell; Thomas H Gallagher; Eric J Thomas Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Rudolf Bertijn Kool; Sophia Martine Kleefstra; Ine Borghans; Femke Atsma; Tom H van de Belt Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 5.428