Literature DB >> 22105578

Adverse events after screening and follow-up colonoscopy.

Carolyn M Rutter1, Eric Johnson, Diana L Miglioretti, Margaret T Mandelson, John Inadomi, Diana S M Buist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We provide new information about how the risk of adverse events following colonoscopy varies by age and indication (screening vs. follow-up performed to evaluate a positive result from another screening modality).
METHODS: We constructed a retrospective cohort comprised of 43,456 individuals aged 40-85 years enrolled in a large integrated healthcare organization in Washington State who underwent outpatient colonoscopy between 1994 and 2009. We calculated rates of serious adverse events (perforation, hemorrhage, and acute diverticulitis) in the 30 days following colonoscopy and compared rates using log-binomial regression models.
RESULTS: We observed 4.7 serious adverse events per 1,000 screening colonoscopies and 6.8 per 1,000 follow-up colonoscopies. Polypectomy increased the rate of serious adverse events (relative rate [RR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-3.56). Older age was associated with increased risk of serious adverse events, after adjusting for polypectomy, gender, and indication. Compared to individuals aged 50-64 years, risk was elevated for those aged 65-74 (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.40-2.65) and 75-85 (RR, 3.21; 95% CI 2.14-4.86). We observed similar age effects in individuals with and without significant comorbid conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of serious adverse events following colonoscopy performed as part of screening are low but increase with age and are more likely after polypectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22105578      PMCID: PMC3406732          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9878-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  22 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Debra J Holden; Russell Harris; Deborah S Porterfield; Daniel E Jonas; Laura C Morgan; Daniel Reuland; Michael Gilchrist; Meera Viswanathan; Kathleen N Lohr; Brieanne Lyda-McDonald
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2010-02

2.  Does Medicare coverage of colonoscopy reduce racial/ethnic disparities in cancer screening among the elderly?

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lirong Zhao; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Evelyn P Whitlock; Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth Liles; Tracy L Beil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Recent advances of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Jae Hee Cheon; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 6.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Stacy Riffle; Leann Michaels; Cynthia Morris; Jennifer Holub; Jean A Shapiro; Marcia A Ciol; Michael B Kimmey; Laura C Seeff; David Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A comparison of cancer risk in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A J Greenstein; D B Sachar; H Smith; H D Janowitz; A H Aufses
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  32 in total

1.  Prompt management is most important for colonic perforation after colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun-Ho Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyung-Jin Kim; Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 2.  Principles of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Identification of core miRNA based on small RNA-seq and RNA-seq for colorectal cancer by bioinformatics.

Authors:  Youwei Kou; Lei Qiao; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-21

Review 4.  Routine colonic endoscopic evaluation following resolution of acute diverticulitis: is it necessary?

Authors:  Amit K Agarwal; Burzeen E Karanjawala; Justin A Maykel; Eric K Johnson; Scott R Steele
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Colonoscopy quality assurance in Ontario: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Erin B Kennedy; David Baron; Mae Burke; Stanley Feinberg; Michael Gould; Nancy Baxter; Nancy Lewis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05

6.  Text message reminders increased colorectal cancer screening in a randomized trial with Alaska Native and American Indian people.

Authors:  Clemma J Muller; Renee F Robinson; Julia J Smith; Meghan A Jernigan; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Denise A Dillard; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Association of polypectomy techniques, endoscopist volume, and facility type with colonoscopy complications.

Authors:  Askar Chukmaitov; Cathy J Bradley; Bassam Dahman; Umaporn Siangphoe; Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  The Necessity of a Colonoscopy after an Acute Diverticulitis Event in Adults Less Than 50 Years Old.

Authors:  Daniel C Alcantar; Claudia Rodriguez; Richard Fernandez; Sanjay Kumar; Christine Junia
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-16

9.  Complication Rates in Colonoscopy Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Zwink; Bernd Holleczek; Christa Stegmaier; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  A cost-efficacy decision analysis of prophylactic clip placement after endoscopic removal of large polyps.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Kyle Zanocco; Rajesh N Keswani; Andrew J Gawron
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.