Literature DB >> 22104412

Planning with parents for seriously ill children: preliminary results on the development of the parental engagement scale.

Joan A Kearney1, Mary W Byrne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a clinically relevant tool to assess parental engagement in decision making and planning for seriously ill children during palliative care consultations. Although little is known about the structure and process of planning meetings between parents and providers, less is known about the nature of parental engagement as it relates to decision making ability in pediatric end-of-life care. Using attachment and caregiving as a framework, this study clarified important dimensions of parental engagement.
METHOD: Using a multi-phase, template-matching technique, both literature and pediatric palliative care consultation data were analyzed, iteratively reviewed, matched, and categorized to create a measure of parental engagement. The attachment paradigm serves as the theoretical framework for the study, which focuses on parental engagement in decision making as a caregiving system function. Attachment and related literatures as well as coping and pediatric palliative care literatures were used in the initial conceptual sampling phase.
RESULTS: The study yielded two groups of findings. The first set of findings centered on the findings of the literature and consultation template-matching phases of the work. These two phases yielded a conceptual model of parental engagement as a psychobehavioral complex consisting of three dimensions: information-centered dialogue, insightful participation, and achievement of a collaboratively agreed-upon plan. The final phases consisted of creation of a 9 point Parental Engagement Scale, scoring of the consultations, and establishment of initial inter- rater reliability at .80. Psychometric testing continues. SIGNIFICANCE OF
RESULTS: Parental engagement in decision making is a critical area for study and intervention. If we can support parents in their caregiving executive functions while understanding the psychological and emotional underpinnings of the caregiving system and parental engagement itself, we can move inquiry forward in understanding parental needs for intervention during this most profoundly challenging time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22104412     DOI: 10.1017/S1478951511000381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


  5 in total

Review 1.  The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Ian P Smith; Isabelle Scholl; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives.

Authors:  Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Douglas J Opel; Neal W Dickert; Daniel B Kramer; Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Keren Ladin; Monica E Peek; Jeff Peppercorn; Jon Tilburt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Shared decision making process measures and patient problems.

Authors:  Sandra A Hartasanchez; Stuart W Grande; Victor M Montori; Marleen Kunneman; Juan P Brito; Sarah McCarthy; Ian G Hargraves
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-11-08

4.  Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes.

Authors:  Marleen Kunneman; Inge Henselmans; Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The nursing dimension of providing palliative care to children and adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Sharron L Docherty; Cheryl Thaxton; Courtney Allison; Raymond C Barfield; Robert F Tamburro
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.