Literature DB >> 22104128

Ulnar component surface finish influenced the outcome of primary Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty.

In-Ho Jeon1, Bernard F Morrey, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains regarding the mechanisms leading to ulnar loosening after elbow replacement. We therefore assessed the loosening rate of the ulnar component as a function of the surface finish of a commonly used implant design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 3 groups who received implants with 3 different surface finishes: sintered beads (278 components), polymethylmethacrylate precoating (219 components), and plasma-sprayed beads (205 components).
RESULTS: The 3 groups who received the implants did not differ statistically in age, sex, or underlying diagnosis. The rates of mechanical failure for the sintered, precoated, and plasma-sprayed ulnar components were 6.8%, 12.8%, and 0%, respectively. The 7-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates free of mechanical failure were 93.1% for the sintered-beads group, 83.1% for the precoated group, and 100% for the plasma-sprayed group. Failed precoated ulnar components often failed early and exhibited typical features, including proximal debonding and severe focal or global osteolysis, sometimes leading to periprosthetic insufficiency fractures.
CONCLUSION: Precoating the ulnar component with polymethylmethacrylate can lead to an increased rate of loosening and severe osteolysis. A plasma-sprayed ulnar component is associated with a very low mechanical failure rate with surveillance of less than 10 years.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22104128     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

Review 1.  What design and material factors impact the wear and corrosion performance in total elbow arthroplasties?

Authors:  Mark P Figgie; Timothy M Wright; Denise Drinkwater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Complications and revisions after semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty: a mono-centre analysis of one hundred cases.

Authors:  Julien Toulemonde; David Ancelin; Vadim Azoulay; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Michel Rongières; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Primary Linked Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-Institution Experience with 461 Elbows Over Three Decades.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Yaser M K Baghdadi; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Primary elbow arthroplasty: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 5.  [Elbow prosthesis after acute fractures : Indications and technique].

Authors:  T Leschinger; M Hackl; F Lanzerath; F Krane; A Harbrecht; K Wegmann; L P Müller
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Armin Badre; Graham J W King
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-20

7.  Why the elbow? My experience and perspective.

Authors:  Bernard Morrey
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 8.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.