Literature DB >> 22104030

Physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion, and stride characteristics during walking on dry land and walking in water, both with and without a water current.

Kenji Masumoto1, Ayako Hamada, Hiro-omi Tomonaga, Kana Kodama, Noboru Hotta.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Walking in water has been included in rehabilitation programs. However, there is a dearth of information regarding the influence of a water current on physiological responses, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and stride characteristics of subjects while they walk in water.
OBJECTIVE: To compare physiological responses, RPE, and stride characteristics of subjects walking in water (with and without a current) with those of subjects walking on dry land.
DESIGN: Repeated measures.
SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 7 male adults (mean age = 21.6 y). INTERVENTION: Subjects walked on a treadmill on dry land and on an underwater treadmill immersed to the level of the xiphoid process. The walking speeds in water were set to be half of that on dry land. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxygen consumption (VO2), respiratory-exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), RPE (for breathing and legs, RPE-Br and RPE-Legs, respectively), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and stride frequency (SF) were measured. In addition, stride length (SL) was calculated.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, and RPE-Legs while walking in water with a current compared with walking on dry land (P > .05). Furthermore, VO2, RER, HR, VE, RPE-Br, RPE-Legs, SF, and SBP while walking in water were significantly higher with a water current than without (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that half the speed should be required to work at the similar metabolic costs and RPE while walking in water with a current, compared with walking on dry land. Furthermore, it was suggested that the physiological responses and RPE would be higher while walking in water with a current than without.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22104030     DOI: 10.1123/jsr.21.2.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Rehabil        ISSN: 1056-6716            Impact factor:   1.931


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Wearable Sensors in Human Movement Analysis in Non-Swimming Aquatic Activities: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel A Marinho; Henrique P Neiva; Jorge E Morais
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Kinematic Adaptations of Forward And Backward Walking on Land and in Water.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Raúl Arellano; Jos Vanrenterghem; Gracia López-Contreras
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.