OBJECTIVES: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is very common, and part of the patients experience persistent symptoms. These may be caused by diffuse neuronal damage and could therefore affect cortical excitability. The motor threshold (MT), measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is a measure of cortical excitability and cortico-spinal tract integrity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used navigated TMS (nTMS) and electromyography to determine subjects' left hemisphere MTs. Nineteen subjects with mTBI (11 with persistent symptoms and eight fully recovered) and nine healthy controls were tested. The injuries had occurred on average 5 years earlier. All participants had normal brain MRIs, that is, no signs of injury. None used centrally acting medication. RESULTS: The mean MT in controls was 43.0% (SD 2.5) of maximum stimulator output. The mTBI subjects mean MT was 53.4% (SD 9.7), being higher than the controls' threshold. Subjective recovery did not correlate with MT. CONCLUSIONS: The results show chronic MT elevation in a sample of subjects with symptomatic or recovered mTBI. This suggests that mTBI may be compensated, although not fully recovered, years after the injury. While the cause for MT elevation cannot be concluded from these preliminary observations, possible explanations include decreased cortical excitability and impaired subcortical conduction.
OBJECTIVES: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is very common, and part of the patients experience persistent symptoms. These may be caused by diffuse neuronal damage and could therefore affect cortical excitability. The motor threshold (MT), measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is a measure of cortical excitability and cortico-spinal tract integrity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used navigated TMS (nTMS) and electromyography to determine subjects' left hemisphere MTs. Nineteen subjects with mTBI (11 with persistent symptoms and eight fully recovered) and nine healthy controls were tested. The injuries had occurred on average 5 years earlier. All participants had normal brain MRIs, that is, no signs of injury. None used centrally acting medication. RESULTS: The mean MT in controls was 43.0% (SD 2.5) of maximum stimulator output. The mTBI subjects mean MT was 53.4% (SD 9.7), being higher than the controls' threshold. Subjective recovery did not correlate with MT. CONCLUSIONS: The results show chronic MT elevation in a sample of subjects with symptomatic or recovered mTBI. This suggests that mTBI may be compensated, although not fully recovered, years after the injury. While the cause for MT elevation cannot be concluded from these preliminary observations, possible explanations include decreased cortical excitability and impaired subcortical conduction.
Authors: Daniel C Herman; Debi Jones; Ashley Harrison; Michael Moser; Susan Tillman; Kevin Farmer; Anthony Pass; James R Clugston; Jorge Hernandez; Terese L Chmielewski Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Michael Vaninetti; Mike Lim; Aladdin Khalaf; Valerie Metzger-Smith; Matthew Flowers; Alphonsa Kunnel; Eric Yang; David Song; Lisa Lin; Alice Tsai; Roland Lee; Shahrokh Golshan; Albert Leung Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Albert Leung; Shivshil Shukla; Eric Yang; Bryan Canlas; Mawj Kadokana; Jason Heald; Ariea Davani; David Song; Lisa Lin; Greg Polston; Alice Tsai; Roland Lee Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 3.395
Authors: Benjamin T Dunkley; Karolina Urban; Leodante Da Costa; Simeon M Wong; Elizabeth W Pang; Margot J Taylor Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Mitchell B Locke; Stephen L Toepp; Claudia V Turco; Diana H Harasym; Michel P Rathbone; Michael D Noseworthy; Aimee J Nelson Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Pract Date: 2020-08-06