Literature DB >> 22103882

Eight-year results of site retention of anorganic bovine bone and anorganic bovine matrix.

Marco Degidi1, Vittoria Perrotti, Adriano Piattelli, Giovanna Iezzi.   

Abstract

The long-term fate of some biomaterials is still unknown, and the reports present in the literature are not conclusive as to whether these biomaterials are resorbed over time or not. Different reports can be found with regard to the resorption behavior of anorganic bovine bone (ABB). The aim of the present study was to provide a comparative histological and histomorphometrical evaluation, in the same patient, of 2 specimens retrieved from a sinus augmented with ABB and with anorganic bovine matrix added to a cell-binding peptide (PepGen P-15), respectively, after a healing period of 6 months and after 8 years of implant loading, to evaluate the resorption of both biomaterials. A unilateral sinus augmentation procedure with ABB (50%) and with PepGen P-15 (50%) was performed in a 54-year-old male patient. Two titanium dental implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface were inserted after 6 months. During this procedure, 2 tissue cores were retrieved from the sinus with a trephine, before implant insertion. After an additional 6 months, a fixed prosthetic restoration was fabricated. One of these implants, after a loading period of 8 years, fractured in the coronal portion and was removed. Both specimens, one retrieved after a 6-month healing period and the other after an 8-year loading period, were treated to obtain thin ground sections. In the 6-month specimen, the histomorphometry showed that the percentage of newly formed bone was 27.2% ± 3.6%, marrow spaces 35.6% ± 2.3%, residual ABB particles 25.1% ± 1.2%, and residual PepGen P-15 particles 12.1% ± 2.2%. In the 8-year specimen, the histomorphometry showed that the percentage of newly formed bone was 51.4% ± 4.8%, marrow spaces 40% ± 7.1%, residual ABB particles 6.2% ± 0.7%, and residual PepGen P-15 particles 2.4% ± 0.5%. Both biomaterials underwent significant resorption over the course of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22103882     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  3 in total

Review 1.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.

Authors:  Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Microarchitecture of the Augmented Bone Following Sinus Elevation with an Albumin Impregnated Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (BoneAlbumin) versus Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral: A Randomized Prospective Clinical, Histomorphometric, and Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Kivovics Márton; Szabó Bence Tamás; Németh Orsolya; Czinkóczky Béla; Dőri Ferenc; Nagy Péter; Dobó-Nagy Csaba; Csönge Lajos; Lacza Zsombor; Mijiritsky Eitan; Szabó György
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Hydrophilicity, Viscoelastic, and Physicochemical Properties Variations in Dental Bone Grafting Substitutes.

Authors:  Branko Trajkovski; Matthias Jaunich; Wolf-Dieter Müller; Florian Beuer; Gregory-George Zafiropoulos; Alireza Houshmand
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.