Literature DB >> 22103695

Indirect object recognition: evidence for associative processes in recognition memory.

Emma Whitt1, Mark Haselgrove, Jasper Robinson.   

Abstract

Rats' exploration of stimulus P (e.g., a domestic object) is reduced following either its direct exposure or its indirect exposure and is taken to indicate recognition memory. Procedures for demonstrating indirect object recognition involve an initial presentation of object P with stimulus X (and of an object Q with stimulus Y). On test, stimulus X is presented with objects P and Q and rats' exploration of Q exceeds their exploration of P. One interpretation here is that the presentation of stimulus X on test associatively activates the memory of object P, which diminishes exploration of P relative to Q. It is possible, instead, that performance is simply the result of a novel pattern of stimulation generated by the unfamiliar combination of X and Q. The authors modified this procedure to reduce the likelihood of such a process. Their procedure involved first the presentation of PX and QY before the presentation of stimulus X alone. During the test that followed, objects P and Q were presented but stimulus X was removed. The authors found that exploration of Q remained greater than that of P despite these modifications and discuss some theoretical implications of indirect, associative processes in recognition memory. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22103695     DOI: 10.1037/a0025886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  5 in total

1.  Relative recency influences object-in-context memory.

Authors:  Shu K E Tam; Charlotte Bonardi; Jasper Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Modulation of recognition memory performance by light requires both melanopsin and classical photoreceptors.

Authors:  Shu K E Tam; Sibah Hasan; Steven Hughes; Mark W Hankins; Russell G Foster; David M Bannerman; Stuart N Peirson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Familiarity-based stimulus generalization of conditioned suppression.

Authors:  Jasper Robinson; Emma J Whitt; Peter M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Ratios and effect size.

Authors:  Jasper Robinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  An associative analysis of recognition memory: Relative recency effects in an eye-tracking paradigm.

Authors:  Aleksander W Nitka; Charlotte Bonardi; Jasper Robinson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.478

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.