Literature DB >> 22103570

Urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer diagnosis: cost-effective application in routine clinical practice in Germany.

Eric Schiffer1, Carsten Bick, Branko Grizelj, Stephan Pietzker, Wolfgang Schöfer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer has been shown to be highly accurate in the detection of prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to report our experience with routine application of this test in clinical practice and its cost-effectiveness.
METHODS: The urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer test was carried out in 211 patients in outpatient centers. In 184 of them, data about their follow up and the test results were available for analysis. Prostate cancer was detected in 49 cases.
RESULTS: The test correctly recognized 42 out of 49 tumor patients, showing a sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval 73-94). Of 135 prostate cancer-negative patients, 79 had a negative urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer test (specificity 59% [79/135 95% confidence interval 50-66]). Negative and positive predictive values were 92% (95% confidence interval 84-96) and 43% (95% confidence interval 33-53), respectively. A statistically significant (P<0.0005) improvement in terms of diagnostic accuracy was observed in comparison with serum prostate-specific antigen and percent-free prostate-specific antigen. Whereas the urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer test results agreed in 65.7% with follow-up reference results, prostate-specific antigen achieved 33.3% and percent-free prostate-specific antigen achieved 42.7%. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer strategy outperformed the biopsy approach as well as prostate-specific antigen tests.
CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive urinary proteome analysis for prostate cancer test appears to be a helpful addition to prostate cancer diagnostics for patients with suspicious prostate-specific antigen and/or digital-rectal examination.
© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22103570     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02901.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Proteome-based diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of prostate cancer].

Authors:  J Neuhaus; E Schiffer; J Siwy; F Mannello; L-C Horn; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Proteomic studies of urinary biomarkers for prostate, bladder and kidney cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Wood; Margaret A Knowles; Douglas Thompson; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Seminal plasma as a source of prostate cancer peptide biomarker candidates for detection of indolent and advanced disease.

Authors:  Jochen Neuhaus; Eric Schiffer; Philine von Wilcke; Hartwig W Bauer; Hing Leung; Justyna Siwy; Wolfram Ulrici; Uwe Paasch; Lars-Christian Horn; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Identification of urinary peptide biomarkers associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Angelique Stalmach; Hanna Johnsson; Iain B McInnes; Holger Husi; Julie Klein; Mohammed Dakna; William Mullen; Harald Mischak; Duncan Porter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Approaches to the discovery of non-invasive urinary biomarkers of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrej Jedinak; Kevin R Loughlin; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-21

Review 6.  Promise and Implementation of Proteomic Prostate Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Agnieszka Latosinska; Maria Frantzi; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-29

7.  CE-MS-based urinary biomarkers to distinguish non-significant from significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Enrique Gomez Gomez; Ana Blanca Pedregosa; José Valero Rosa; Agnieszka Latosinska; Zoran Culig; Axel S Merseburger; Raul M Luque; María José Requena Tapia; Harald Mischak; Julia Carrasco Valiente
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Models in Prostate Cancer: Exploring New Developments in Testing and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Edna Keeney; Howard Thom; Emma Turner; Richard M Martin; Josie Morley; Sabina Sanghera
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 9.  Proteomic approaches in biomarker discovery: new perspectives in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Petra Hudler; Nina Kocevar; Radovan Komel
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-14

Review 10.  Health Economic Evidence for Liquid- and Tissue-based Molecular Tests that Inform Decisions on Prostate Biopsies and Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Koen Degeling; Amanda Pereira-Salgado; Niall M Corcoran; Paul C Boutros; Peter Kuhn; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.