BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of thrombosis among myelodysplastic syndrome patients exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agents. It is not clear whether erythropoiesis stimulating agents are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in myelodysplastic syndromes, as they are among patients with solid tumors. DESIGN AND METHODS: The association between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and transient thrombosis risk in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes was assessed in a case-crossover study nested within a cohort of incident myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database, cases with an incident diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis were identified. Using conditional logistical regression, the odds of exposure to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in the 12 weeks prior to the incident deep vein thrombosis (hazard period) was compared to the exposure odds in a prior 12-week comparison period. RESULTS: Within the cohort of eligibles with myelodysplastic syndromes (n = 5,673) there were 212 incident cases of deep vein thrombosis events. Mean age was 76.2 (standard deviation = ± 8.6) years. Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents was not associated with deep vein thrombosis in the crude nor the adjusted models (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.43). Central venous catheter placement (OR = 6.47, 95% CI: 2.37, 17.62) and red blood cell transfusion (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 2.29, 9.23) were associated with deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the link between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and thrombosis among patients with solid tumors, this study provides evidence that their safety profile may be different among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of thrombosis among myelodysplastic syndromepatients exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agents. It is not clear whether erythropoiesis stimulating agents are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in myelodysplastic syndromes, as they are among patients with solid tumors. DESIGN AND METHODS: The association between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and transient thrombosis risk in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes was assessed in a case-crossover study nested within a cohort of incident myelodysplastic syndromepatients. Using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database, cases with an incident diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis were identified. Using conditional logistical regression, the odds of exposure to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in the 12 weeks prior to the incident deep vein thrombosis (hazard period) was compared to the exposure odds in a prior 12-week comparison period. RESULTS: Within the cohort of eligibles with myelodysplastic syndromes (n = 5,673) there were 212 incident cases of deep vein thrombosis events. Mean age was 76.2 (standard deviation = ± 8.6) years. Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents was not associated with deep vein thrombosis in the crude nor the adjusted models (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.43). Central venous catheter placement (OR = 6.47, 95% CI: 2.37, 17.62) and red blood cell transfusion (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 2.29, 9.23) were associated with deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the link between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and thrombosis among patients with solid tumors, this study provides evidence that their safety profile may be different among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Authors: Julia Bohlius; Simon Langensiepen; Guido Schwarzer; Jerome Seidenfeld; Margaret Piper; Charles Bennett; Andreas Engert Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-04-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Julia Bohlius; Jayne Wilson; Jerome Seidenfeld; Margaret Piper; Guido Schwarzer; Josie Sandercock; Sven Trelle; Olaf Weingart; Sue Bayliss; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles L Bennett; Simon Langensiepen; Chris Hyde; Andreas Engert Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-05-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Howard L Corwin; Andrew Gettinger; Timothy C Fabian; Addison May; Ronald G Pearl; Stephen Heard; Robert An; Peter J Bowers; Paul Burton; Mark A Klausner; Michael J Corwin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-09-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew W Reynolds; Atsuko Shibata; Sean Zhao; Natalie Jones; Kyle Fahrbach; Lawrence Tim Goodnough Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: J Glaspy; J Crawford; J Vansteenkiste; D Henry; S Rao; P Bowers; J A Berlin; D Tomita; K Bridges; H Ludwig Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Amy J Davidoff; Sheila R Weiss; Maria R Baer; Xuehua Ke; Franklin Hendrick; Amer Zeidan; Steven D Gore Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: U Platzbecker; A Symeonidis; E N Oliva; J S Goede; M Delforge; J Mayer; B Slama; S Badre; E Gasal; B Mehta; J Franklin Journal: Leukemia Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Marit M Suttorp; Henrik Frederiksen; Tiny Hoekstra; Olaf M Dekkers; Lars Pedersen; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Friedo W Dekker; Henrik Toft Sørensen Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 4.790