Literature DB >> 22102421

Macrophage reactivity to different polymers demonstrates particle size- and material-specific reactivity: PEEK-OPTIMA(®) particles versus UHMWPE particles in the submicron, micron, and 10 micron size ranges.

Nadim James Hallab1, Kyron McAllister, Mark Brady, Marcus Jarman-Smith.   

Abstract

Biologic reactivity to orthopedic implant debris is generally the main determinant of long-term clinical performance where released polymeric particles of Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) remain the most prevalent debris generated from metal-on-polymer bearing total joint arthroplasties. Polymeric alternatives to UHMWPE such as polyetherether-ketone (PEEK) may have increased wear resistance but the bioreactivity of PEEK-OPTIMA particles on peri-implant inflammation remains largely uncharacterized. We evaluated human monocyte/macrophage responses (THP-1s and primary human) when challenged by PEEK-OPTIMA, UHMWPE, and X-UHMWPE particles of three particle sizes (0.7 um, 2 um, and 10 um) at a dose of 20 particles-per-cell at 24- and 48-h time points. Macrophage responses were measured using cytotoxicity assays, viability assays, proliferation assays and cytokine analysis (IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α). In general, there were no significant differences between PEEK-OPTIMA, UHMWPE, and X-UHMWPE particles on macrophage viability or proliferation. However, macrophages demonstrated greater cytotoxicity responses to UHMWPE and X-UHMWPE than to PEEK-OPTIMA at 24 and 48 h, where 0.7 μm-UHMWPE particles produced the highest amount of cytotoxicity. Particles of X-UHMWPE more than PEEK-OPTIMA and UHMWPE induced IL-1β, IL-6, MCP-1, and TNF-α at 24 h, p < 0.05 (no significant differences at 48 h). On average, cytokine production was more adversely affected by larger 10 μm particles than by 0.7 and 2 μm sized particles. While limitations of in vitro analysis apply to this study, PEEK-OPTIMA particles were more biocompatible than UHMWPE particles, in that they induced less inflammatory cytokine responses and thus, in part, demonstrates that PEEK-OPTIMA implant debris does not represent an increased inflammatory risk over that of UHMWPE.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MG-63 osteoblasts; PEEK; THP-1 macrophages; UHMWPE; fibroblasts; particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102421     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of epidural versus intradiscal biocompatibility of PEEK implant debris: an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Nadim J Hallab; Qi-Bin Bao; Tim Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Unicortical PEEK inset locking fixation for metacarpal fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Colin A Mudrick; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Jonathan E Isaacs
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12

3.  Study on critical-sized ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles loaded with alendronate sodium: in vitro release and cell response.

Authors:  Yumei Liu; Feng Shi; Kemeng Gong; Yang Liu; Wei Zhi; Jie Weng; Shuxin Qu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Exposure of articular chondrocytes to wear particles induces phagocytosis, differential inflammatory gene expression, and reduced proliferation.

Authors:  Michael D Kurdziel; Meagan Salisbury; Lige Kaplan; Tristan Maerz; Kevin C Baker
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Macrophage integrins modulate response to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles and direct particle-induced osteolysis.

Authors:  Toral D Zaveri; Natalia V Dolgova; Jamal S Lewis; Kiri Hamaker; Michael J Clare-Salzler; Benjamin G Keselowsky
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Grafting Polymer Brushes by ATRP from Functionalized Poly(ether ether ketone) Microparticles.

Authors:  Liye Fu; Hossein Jafari; Michael Gießl; Saigopalakrishna S Yerneni; Mingkang Sun; Zongyu Wang; Tong Liu; Kriti Kapil; Boyle C Cheng; Alexander Yu; Saadyah E Averick; Krzysztof Matyjaszewski
Journal:  Polym Adv Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.348

Review 7.  The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ashley A Stratton-Powell; Kinga M Pasko; Claire L Brockett; Joanne L Tipper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Rapid Analyses of Polyetheretherketone Wear Characteristics by Accelerated Wear Testing with Microfabricated Surfaces for Artificial Joint Systems.

Authors:  Chen-Ying Su; Chien-Wei Kuo; Hsu-Wei Fang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Cobalt-alloy implant debris induce HIF-1α hypoxia associated responses: a mechanism for metal-specific orthopedic implant failure.

Authors:  Lauryn Samelko; Marco S Caicedo; Seung-Jae Lim; Craig Della-Valle; Joshua Jacobs; Nadim J Hallab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cobalt Alloy Implant Debris Induces Inflammation and Bone Loss Primarily through Danger Signaling, Not TLR4 Activation: Implications for DAMP-ening Implant Related Inflammation.

Authors:  Lauryn Samelko; Stefan Landgraeber; Kyron McAllister; Joshua Jacobs; Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.