Literature DB >> 22102302

Partnering to harmonize IRBs for community-engaged research to reduce health disparities.

Zoë H Hammatt1, Junko Nishitani, Kevin C Heslin, M Theresa Perry, Carolyn Szetela, Loretta Jones, Pluscedia Williams, Donna Antoine-LaVigne, Nell G Forge, Keith C Norris.   

Abstract

Emerging advances in health disparities research include controlled trials and comparative effectiveness studies that are frequently conducted at multiple community and academic sites. Review by different institutional review boards (IRBs) presents a major impediment to the timely and effective conduct of such research. When research involves minority and underserved communities as well as multiple geographic regions, institutional requirements and interpretation of ethical standards may vary substantially. Such variations can complicate the informed consent process and research protocol, and may undermine participant respect and trial quality. In addition, multiple IRB review can lead to unnecessary delays, jeopardizing funding and capacity to perform collaborative projects. In response to these issues, the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Translational Research Network (RTRN) is developing a community-partnered approach to streamlining IRB review across its consortium of 18 RCMI grantee institutions that will ensure compliance while enhancing the quality of health disparities research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102302      PMCID: PMC3579219          DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  10 in total

1.  Medical innovation and institutional interdependence: rethinking university-industry connections.

Authors:  Annetine C Gelijns; Samuel O Thier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials.

Authors:  Michaele C Christian; Jacquelyn L Goldberg; Jack Killen; Jeffrey S Abrams; Mary S McCabe; Joan K Mauer; Robert E Wittes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  IRBs under the microscope.

Authors:  Jonathan D Moreno
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1998-09

4.  The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee.

Authors:  S E Lind
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1992

5.  The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.

Authors:  Jerry Menikoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources.

Authors:  Nicole Sirotin; Leslie E Wolf; Lance M Pollack; Joseph A Catania; M Margaret Dolcini; Bernard Lo
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

7.  The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.

Authors:  H Edgar; D J Rothman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research.

Authors:  G Corbie-Smith; S B Thomas; M V Williams; S Moody-Ayers
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Participation in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Allen L Gifford; William E Cunningham; Kevin C Heslin; Ron M Andersen; Terry Nakazono; Dale K Lieu; Martin F Shapiro; Samuel A Bozzette
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.

Authors:  Leslie E Wolf; Mary Croughan; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Ethical considerations for conducting health disparities research in community health centers: a social-ecological perspective.

Authors:  Carla Boutin-Foster; Ebony Scott; Jennifer Melendez; Anna Rodriguez; Rosio Ramos; Balavenkatesh Kanna; Walid Michelen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research.

Authors:  Francis Barchi; Megan Kasimatis Singleton; Jon F Merz
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Using the IRB Harmonization and Reliance Document Can Reduce Review and Regulatory Delays for the Benefit of All.

Authors:  Stephen Sodeke
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Leading by Success: Impact of a Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Program to Address Health Inequities.

Authors:  Bruce Shiramizu; Vicki Shambaugh; Helen Petrovich; Todd B Seto; Tammy Ho; Noreen Mokuau; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  User-Friendly Data-Sharing Practices for Fostering Collaboration within a Research Network: Roles of a Vanguard Center for a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Jae Eun Lee; Jung Hye Sung; M Edwina Barnett; Keith Norris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.