STUDY DESIGN: Review of peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVE: Outline the effects of neck and cervical spine morphology on soft tissue injury Potential during low velocity automotive rear impacts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Automotive rear impacts are mechanical events and the response of the human head-neck complex can be thought of in biomechanical terms. This manuscript reviews evidence from peer-reviewed studies implicating occupant-related factors in the onset and severity of cervical spine soft-tissue injury. METHODS: Effects of anatomical characteristics, head-neck and spine orientation, facet joints, and neck muscles were reviewed. RESULTS: On the basis of existing biomechanically based research, the following occupant-related characteristics can influence the response of the cervical spine during automotive rear impacts: anatomical dimensions of the cervical spine, head-neck and cervical spine orientation at the time of impact, facet joint orientation, and neck muscle size and orientation. CONCLUSION: The response of the cervical spine to rear impacts can be described using biomechanical concepts. This review has identified occupant-related factors that can influence injury susceptibility and cited biomechanically related research to outline the method by which those factors affect the overall head-neck and cervical spine response in such a way as to increase the susceptibility or severity of injury for a given rear impact event.
STUDY DESIGN: Review of peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVE: Outline the effects of neck and cervical spine morphology on soft tissue injury Potential during low velocity automotive rear impacts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Automotive rear impacts are mechanical events and the response of the human head-neck complex can be thought of in biomechanical terms. This manuscript reviews evidence from peer-reviewed studies implicating occupant-related factors in the onset and severity of cervical spine soft-tissue injury. METHODS: Effects of anatomical characteristics, head-neck and spine orientation, facet joints, and neck muscles were reviewed. RESULTS: On the basis of existing biomechanically based research, the following occupant-related characteristics can influence the response of the cervical spine during automotive rear impacts: anatomical dimensions of the cervical spine, head-neck and cervical spine orientation at the time of impact, facet joint orientation, and neck muscle size and orientation. CONCLUSION: The response of the cervical spine to rear impacts can be described using biomechanical concepts. This review has identified occupant-related factors that can influence injury susceptibility and cited biomechanically related research to outline the method by which those factors affect the overall head-neck and cervical spine response in such a way as to increase the susceptibility or severity of injury for a given rear impact event.