Literature DB >> 22101656

Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: the easy way.

Michal Pinhas1, Joseph Tzelgov, Dana Ganor-Stern.   

Abstract

Research in cognitive science has documented numerous phenomena that are approximated by linear relationships. In the domain of numerical cognition, the use of linear regression for estimating linear effects (e.g., distance and SNARC effects) became common following Fias, Brysbaert, Geypens, and d'Ydewalle's (1996) study on the SNARC effect. While their work has become the model for analyzing linear effects in the field, it requires statistical analysis of individual participants and does not provide measures of the proportions of variability accounted for (cf. Lorch & Myers, 1990). In the present methodological note, using both the distance and SNARC effects as examples, we demonstrate how linear effects can be estimated in a simple way within the framework of repeated measures analysis of variance. This method allows for estimating effect sizes in terms of both slope and proportions of variability accounted for. Finally, we show that our method can easily be extended to estimate linear interaction effects, not just linear effects calculated as main effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22101656     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0172-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  16 in total

1.  Competitor rule priming: evidence for priming of task rules in task switching.

Authors:  Maayan Katzir; Bnaya Ori; Shulan Hsieh; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Delia Pigat; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-19

3.  Is place-value processing in four-digit numbers fully automatic? Yes, but not always.

Authors:  Javier García-Orza; Alejandro J Estudillo; Marina Calleja; José Miguel Rodríguez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

4.  Beyond the SNARC effect: distance-number mapping occurs in the peripersonal space.

Authors:  Yi-Huan Chen; Ji-Fan Zhou; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Nonsymbolic and symbolic representations of null numerosity.

Authors:  Rut Zaks-Ohayon; Michal Pinhas; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-11

6.  The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association.

Authors:  Danielle Hoffmann; Christophe Mussolin; Romain Martin; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations.

Authors:  Krzysztof Cipora; Mateusz Hohol; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes; Bartosz Brożek; Bartłomiej Kucharzyk; Edward Nęcka
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-11

8.  On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Joseph Tzelgov; Bar Zohar-Shai; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-30

9.  Spatial Representation of Ordinal Information.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Xuefei Gao; Baichen Li; Shuyuan Yu; Tianwei Gong; Ting Jiang; Qingfen Hu; Yinghe Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

10.  How Math Anxiety Relates to Number-Space Associations.

Authors:  Carrie Georges; Danielle Hoffmann; Christine Schiltz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.