Literature DB >> 22101407

An in vitro investigation of metabolically sensitive biomarkers in breast cancer progression.

Natalie E Simpson1, Volodymyr P Tryndyak, Frederick A Beland, Igor P Pogribny.   

Abstract

Epigenetic biomarkers are emerging as determinants of breast cancer prognosis. Breast cancer cells display unique alterations in major cellular metabolic pathways and it is becoming widely recognized that enzymes that regulate epigenetic alterations are metabolically sensitive. In this study, we used microarray data from the GEO database to compare gene expression for regulators of metabolism and epigenetic alterations among non-invasive epithelial (MCF-7, MDA-MB-361, and T-47D) and invasive mesenchymal (MDA-MB-231, Hs-578T, and BT-549) breast cancer cell lines. The expression of genes, including GLS1, GFPT2, LDHA, HDAC9, MYST2, and SUV420H2, was assessed using RT-PCR. There was differential expression between epithelial and mesenchymal cell lines. MYST2 and SUV420H2 regulate the levels of the epigenetic biomarkers histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16ac) and histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation (H4K20me3), respectively. Reduced amounts of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 correlated with lower levels of MYST2 and SUV420H2 in mesenchymal cells and, along with reduced amounts of histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation (H3K9ac), were found to distinguish epithelial from mesenchymal cells. In addition, both GLS1 and GFPT2 play roles in glutamine metabolism and were observed to be more highly expressed in mesenchymal cell lines, and when glutamine and glutamate levels reported in the NCI-60 metabolomics dataset were compared, the ratio of glutamate/glutamine was found to be higher in mesenchymal cells. Blocking the conversion of glutamine to glutamate using an allosteric inhibitor, Compound 968, against GLS1, increased H4K16ac in T-47D and MDA-MB-231 cells, linking glutamine metabolism to a particular histone modification in breast cancer. These findings support the concept that metabolically sensitive histone modifications and corresponding histone modifying enzymes can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for breast cancer. It also further emphasizes the importance of glutamine metabolism in tumor progression and that inhibitors of cellular metabolic pathways may join histone deacetylase inhibitors as a form of epigenetic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22101407     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1871-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  28 in total

1.  Delineating metabolic signatures of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: phospholipase A2, a potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Pratima Tripathi; Pachiyappan Kamarajan; Bagganahalli S Somashekar; Neil MacKinnon; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Yvonne L Kapila; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.085

2.  Modifying metabolically sensitive histone marks by inhibiting glutamine metabolism affects gene expression and alters cancer cell phenotype.

Authors:  Natalie E Simpson; Volodymyr P Tryndyak; Marta Pogribna; Frederick A Beland; Igor P Pogribny
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  The receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 promotes glutamine metabolism in tumors by activating the transcriptional coactivators YAP and TAZ.

Authors:  Deanna N Edwards; Verra M Ngwa; Shan Wang; Eileen Shiuan; Dana M Brantley-Sieders; Laura C Kim; Albert B Reynolds; Jin Chen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 4.  Targeting metabolism in breast cancer: How far we can go?

Authors:  Jing-Pei Long; Xiao-Na Li; Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10

5.  Glutaminase inhibitor compound 968 inhibits cell proliferation and sensitizes paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lingqin Yuan; Xiugui Sheng; Leslie H Clark; Lu Zhang; Hui Guo; Hannah M Jones; Adam K Willson; Paola A Gehrig; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria L Bae-Jump
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Macrophage mitochondrial fission improves cancer cell phagocytosis induced by therapeutic antibodies and is impaired by glutamine competition.

Authors:  Jiang Li; Yingying Ye; Zhihan Liu; Guoyang Zhang; Huiqi Dai; Jiaqian Li; Boxuan Zhou; Yihong Li; Qiyi Zhao; Jingying Huang; Jingwei Feng; Shu Liu; Peigang Ruan; Jinjing Wang; Jiang Liu; Min Huang; Xinwei Liu; Shubin Yu; Ziyang Liang; Liping Ma; Xiaoxia Gou; Guoliang Zhang; Nian Chen; Yiwen Lu; Can Di; Qidong Xia; Jiayao Pan; Ru Feng; Qingqing Cai; Shicheng Su
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 7.  Glutaminase regulation in cancer cells: a druggable chain of events.

Authors:  William P Katt; Richard A Cerione
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 8.  Targeting GLS1 to cancer therapy through glutamine metabolism.

Authors:  Wei Yu; XiangYu Yang; Qian Zhang; Li Sun; ShengTao Yuan; YongJie Xin
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Glutamine sensitivity analysis identifies the xCT antiporter as a common triple-negative breast tumor therapeutic target.

Authors:  Luika A Timmerman; Thomas Holton; Mariia Yuneva; Raymond J Louie; Mercè Padró; Anneleen Daemen; Min Hu; Denise A Chan; Stephen P Ethier; Laura J van 't Veer; Kornelia Polyak; Frank McCormick; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  The lipid phenotype of breast cancer cells characterized by Raman microspectroscopy: towards a stratification of malignancy.

Authors:  Claudia Nieva; Monica Marro; Naiara Santana-Codina; Satish Rao; Dmitri Petrov; Angels Sierra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.