Literature DB >> 22101150

Determinants of regurgitant volume in mitral regurgitation: contrasting effect of similar effective regurgitant orifice area in functional and organic mitral regurgitation.

Andrea Chiampan1, Julien Nahum, Mohamed Leye, Johanna Oziel, Caroline Cueff, Eric Brochet, Bernard Iung, Andrea Rossi, Alec Vahanian, David Messika-Zeitoun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) is based on the calculation of the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO), a measure of lesion severity, and of the regurgitant volume (RVol), a measure of left ventricular volume overload. We aimed at evaluating the determinants of RVol in both organic (OMR) and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: MR severity was quantitatively assessed using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in 240 patients, 142 with OMR and 98 patients with FMR. By definition, ERO and RVol were strongly correlated both in patients with OMR and FMR (both R = 0.90, P < 0.0001) but the slopes of the regression lines were significantly different (P < 0.0001). This difference remained significant in patients with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP > 40 mmHg, P < 0.0001) but not in patients with normal SPAP (≤40 mmHg, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, independent determinants of RVol were ERO (P < 0.0001), MR mechanism (FMR/OMR) (P = 0.0003) and SPAP (P = 0.03). In patients with elevated SPAP, ERO (P < 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = 0.03), and MR mechanism (P = 0.03) were independently associated with RVol, whereas in patients with normal SPAP, ERO (P < 0.0001) was the only independent determinant of RVol.
CONCLUSION: In the present study, we evaluated the contrasting effect of similar lesion severity in OMR and FMR and showed that similar ERO were associated with lower RVol in FMR compared with OMR. The regurgitant volume is the result of complex interactions of anatomic lesions, LVEF, and SPAP and our results highlight the importance of taking into account these parameters when interpreting RVol values in clinical practice, especially in FMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22101150     DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  2 in total

1.  Development of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Kim; Goo-Yeong Cho; Yong-Jin Kim; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Seung-Pyo Lee; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Jin Joo Park; Yeonyee E Yoon; Joo-Hee Zo; Dae-Won Sohn
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Insights into functional mitral regurgitation using the average pixel intensity method.

Authors:  Victor Kamoen; Milad El Haddad; Tine De Backer; Marc De Buyzere; Frank Timmermans
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.