OBJECTIVES: Although EDs are responsible for the initial care of critically ill patients and the amount of critical care provided in the ED is increasing, there are few data examining mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ED. In addition, characteristics of ED-based ventilation may affect planning for ventilator shortages during pandemic influenza or bioterrorist events. The study examined the epidemiology of MV in US EDs, including demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics; indications for MV; ED length of stay (LOS); and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of the 1993 to 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data sets. Ventilated patients were compared with ED patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to all other ED visits. RESULTS: There were 3.6 million ED MV visits (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.0 million) over the study period. Sex, age, race, and payment source were similar for mechanically ventilated and ICU patients (P > .05 for all). Approximately 12.5% of ventilated patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with 1.7% of ICU admissions and 0.2% of all other ED visits (P < .0001). Accordingly, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for ventilated patients (24%; 95% CI, 13.1%-34.9%) than both comparison groups (9.3% and 2.5%, respectively). Median LOS for ventilated patients was 197 minutes (interquartile range, 112-313 minutes) compared with 224 minutes for ICU admissions and 140 minutes for all other ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ED MV have particularly high in-hospital mortality rates, but their ED LOS is sufficient for implementation of evidence-based ventilator interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Although EDs are responsible for the initial care of critically illpatients and the amount of critical care provided in the ED is increasing, there are few data examining mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ED. In addition, characteristics of ED-based ventilation may affect planning for ventilator shortages during pandemic influenza or bioterrorist events. The study examined the epidemiology of MV in US EDs, including demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics; indications for MV; ED length of stay (LOS); and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of the 1993 to 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data sets. Ventilated patients were compared with EDpatients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to all other ED visits. RESULTS: There were 3.6 million ED MV visits (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.0 million) over the study period. Sex, age, race, and payment source were similar for mechanically ventilated and ICU patients (P > .05 for all). Approximately 12.5% of ventilated patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with 1.7% of ICU admissions and 0.2% of all other ED visits (P < .0001). Accordingly, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for ventilated patients (24%; 95% CI, 13.1%-34.9%) than both comparison groups (9.3% and 2.5%, respectively). Median LOS for ventilated patients was 197 minutes (interquartile range, 112-313 minutes) compared with 224 minutes for ICU admissions and 140 minutes for all other ED visits. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing ED MV have particularly high in-hospital mortality rates, but their ED LOS is sufficient for implementation of evidence-based ventilator interventions.
Authors: Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Christopher Palmer; Brian T Wessman; Enyo Ablordeppey; Jacob Keeperman; Robert J Stephens; Cristopher C Briscoe; Angelina A Kolomiets; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: David B Page; Anne M Drewry; Enyo Ablordeppey; Nicholas M Mohr; Marin H Kollef; Brian M Fuller Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr; Christopher N Miller; Andrew R Deitchman; Brian J Levine; Nicole Castagno; Elizabeth C Hassebroek; Adam Dhedhi; Nicholas Scott-Wittenborn; Edward Grace; Courtney Lehew; Marin H Kollef Journal: Chest Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Ian T Ferguson; Stephen Trzeciak; Marin H Kollef; Brian W Roberts Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Brian M Fuller; Brian W Roberts; Nicholas M Mohr; William A Knight; Opeolu Adeoye; Ryan D Pappal; Stacy Marshall; Robert Alunday; Matthew Dettmer; Munish Goyal; Colin Gibson; Brian J Levine; Jayna M Gardner-Gray; Jarrod Mosier; James Dargin; Fraser Mackay; Nicholas J Johnson; Sharukh Lokhandwala; Catherine L Hough; Joseph E Tonna; Rachel Tsolinas; Frederick Lin; Zaffer A Qasim; Carrie E Harvey; Benjamin Bassin; Robert J Stephens; Yan Yan; Christopher R Carpenter; Marin H Kollef; Michael S Avidan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Christopher Palmer; Brian T Wessman; Enyo Ablordeppey; Jacob Keeperman; Robert J Stephens; Cristopher C Briscoe; Angelina A Kolomiets; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Christian Michael Horvath; Martin Hugo Brutsche; Otto Dagobert Schoch; Bernarde Schillig; Florent Baty; Dieter vonOw; Jochen Julius Rüdiger Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Guruprasad D Jambaulikar; Samuel Hohmann; Naomi R George; Emily L Aaronson; Rebecca Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; James A Tulsky; Jeremiah D Schuur; Daniel J Pallin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ryan D Pappal; Brian W Roberts; Nicholas M Mohr; Enyo Ablordeppey; Brian T Wessman; Anne M Drewry; Winston Winkler; Yan Yan; Marin H Kollef; Michael S Avidan; Brian M Fuller Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Emily M Evans; Rebecca J Doctor; Brian F Gage; Richard S Hotchkiss; Brian M Fuller; Anne M Drewry Journal: Shock Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.454