Literature DB >> 22100170

Comparison of Cryotip vs. Cryotop for mouse and human blastomere vitrification.

Diana Valbuena1, Maria Eugenia Póo, Cristobal Aguilar-Gallardo, Sebastian Martinez, Ana Cristina Cobo, Antonio Pellicer, Carlos Simón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficiency of two vitrification methods for single-blastomere cryopreservation with mouse or human embryos.
DESIGN: Experimental prospective controlled study.
SETTING: Research center. PATIENT(S): Human Blastomeres were obtained after biopsy. INTERVENTION(S): Mouse blastomeres were obtained after diluting the zona pellucida of embryos with Tyrode acid and manual isolation. Individual human blastomeres were biopsied from embryos following established clinical protocols. The modified open Cryotop and classical closed Cryotip vitrification systems were assayed. After thawing, some mouse blastomeres were fixed and analyzed for apoptotic markers annexin V and caspase 3 with the use of immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Ultrastructural morphology was examined using electron microscopy. The human blastomere division rate was assessed 24 hours after thawing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blastomere survival and division rates after thawing, apoptotic markers, and electron microscopy; adhesion and outgrowth rates of human blastomeres. RESULT(S): After thawing, survival rates in mouse blastomeres using Cryotop vs. Cryotip were 38.46% vs. 85.41%, respectively. As expected, thawed morphologically alive blastomeres were classified negative for annexin V and caspase 3, whereas degenerated blastomeres were positive for both. Further, nuclear chromatin was compacted. Survival rates of human blastomeres vitrified with Cryotop were 22.78% vs. 53.77% with Cryotip. Division capabilities were 16.6% and 47.16%, respectively, in Cryotop and Cryotip. CONCLUSION(S): The closed system is more efficient in preserving mouse and human blastomeres in terms of acceptable survival and division rates, and it also complies with European Union directives.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100170     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Fine morphological assessment of quality of human mature oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification with a closed device: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Bianchi; Guido Macchiarelli; Andrea Borini; Michela Lappi; Sandra Cecconi; Selenia Miglietta; Giuseppe Familiari; Stefania A Nottola
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hongcai Cai; Jean Damascene Niringiyumukiza; Yamin Li; Qiaohong Lai; Yinzhao Jia; Ping Su; Wenpei Xiang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos.

Authors:  Yamato Mizobe; Yukari Kuwatsuru; Yuko Kuroki; Yumiko Fukumoto; Mari Tokudome; Harue Moewaki; Mia Watanabe; Tatsunori Tabira; Tokiko Iwakawa; Kazuhiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-23

4.  Vitrification of mouse embryos using the thin plastic strip method.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Ryu; Yong Soo Hur; Ji Young Ann; Ja Young Maeng; Miji Park; Jeong Hyun Park; Jung Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.