Literature DB >> 22099544

Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty.

Thomas Mussweiler1, Ann-Christin Posten.   

Abstract

Comparison is one of the most ubiquitous and versatile mechanisms in human information processing. Previous research demonstrates that one consequence of comparative thinking is increased judgmental efficiency: comparison allows for quicker judgments without a loss in accuracy. We hypothesised that a second potential consequence of comparative thinking is reduced judgmental uncertainty. We examined this possibility in three experiments using three different domains of judgment and three different measures of uncertainty. Results consistently demonstrate that procedurally priming participants to rely more heavily on comparative thinking during judgment induces them to feel more certain about their judgment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22099544     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  2 in total

1.  Towards Supporting Patient Decision-making In Online Diabetes Communities.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Rebecca Marmor; Jina Huh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Developing research questions in conversation with the literature: operationalization & tool support.

Authors:  Oscar Díaz; Jeremías P Contell
Journal:  Empir Softw Eng       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.762

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.