Literature DB >> 22098282

Protocol-driven costs in trial-based pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Afschin Gandjour1.   

Abstract

Many authors and guidelines have proposed to exclude protocol-driven costs from cost-effectiveness analyses alongside clinical trials because they do not occur in clinical practice. This article, however, argues that only costs to improve patient adherence can be excluded, as the underlying protocol-driven activities have a clearly distinguishable cost and utility impact (most of the time). All other protocol-driven costs need to be included because the cost and utility impact of the underlying protocol-driven activities cannot be easily separated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22098282     DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  3 in total

1.  Estimation of Cost for Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Risk Population in Rural China: Results from a Population-Level Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fuxiao Li; Xiang Li; Chuanhai Guo; Ruiping Xu; Fenglei Li; Yaqi Pan; Mengfei Liu; Zhen Liu; Chao Shi; Hui Wang; Minmin Wang; Hongrui Tian; Fangfang Liu; Ying Liu; Jingjing Li; Hong Cai; Li Yang; Zhonghu He; Yang Ke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness of an adherence-enhancing intervention for gout based on real-world data.

Authors:  Lydia Wenxin Lin; Gim Gee Teng; Anita Yee Nah Lim; Joanne Su-Yin Yoong; Niklas Zethraeus; Hwee-Lin Wee
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Cost data in implementation science: categories and approaches to costing.

Authors:  Heather T Gold; Cara McDermott; Ties Hoomans; Todd H Wagner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 7.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.