Literature DB >> 22096350

Etanercept, improved dosage schedules and combinations in the treatment of psoriasis: an update.

Siegfried Segaert1.   

Abstract

Etanercept, a subcutaneously administered fully human soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor, was initially approved for the treatment of psoriasis at a dose of 25 mg twice weekly in repeated 24-week cycles with the possibility to double the dose in the first 12 weeks of the first cycle. During intermittent treatment, patients retain their ability to respond to etanercept. Recently, a new dosing schedule of etanercept 50 mg once weekly was approved, based on a study in which PASI-75 (75% improvement of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) was achieved by 37% and 71% of patients at week 12 and 24. Another study demonstrated a PASI-75 of 57% and 69% in pediatric psoriasis patients receiving etanercept 0.8 mg/kg (up to 50 mg) once weekly for 12 and 24 weeks respectively, resulting in European approval from age 8. Based on recent clinical trials, the antipsoriatic effect of etanercept can be markedly increased in combination with acitretin, methotrexate or UVB. The combination with acitretin appears attractive because of its non-immunosuppressive and chemopreventive properties. Etanercept-methotrexate combination therapy is well established in rheumatologic patients. From a long-term perspective, the combination of TNF-inhibitors with phototherapy (photocarcinogenesis) or cyclosporine (carcinogenesis, infections) warrants great caution however. Finally, combination with topical calcipotriol-betamethasone ointment may increase the speed of response to TNF-inhibitors in the first 4 weeks of treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combination therapy; dosing schedules; etanercept; psoriasis

Year:  2009        PMID: 22096350      PMCID: PMC3218722          DOI: 10.2147/jir.s4405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inflamm Res        ISSN: 1178-7031


Introduction

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was first identified in the serum of bacillus Calmette-Guérin-infected mice treated with endotoxin, as a factor inducing necrosis of transplanted tumors.1 TNF is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, produced by different cell types including lymphocytes, macrophages and keratinocytes, with pleiotropic effects on numerous tissues.2 It is expressed as a membrane-bound trimeric protein that is cleaved by TNFα-converting enzyme (TACE) to yield soluble TNF. The actions of TNF are transduced via two types of receptors: TNF-RI initiating a cascade of caspase activation leading to apoptosis and TNF-RII activating the pro-inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) through an intracellular signaling pathway.2 TNF occupies a pivotal position in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the joints (rheumatoid arthritis), gut (inflammatory bowel disease) and skin (psoriasis).2 The central role of TNF in the pathophysiology of psoriasis was however only fully recognized following the observation that psoriasis fully cleared in a Crohn’s disease patient receiving the TNF monoclonal antibody infliximab.3 Indeed, TNF levels are elevated in psoriasis both in the serum as in the psoriatic skin itself.4 Moreover, the increase of TNF in psoriasis patients correlates with the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score whereas the reduction of TNF is linked to the clinical response.5 Consequently, psoriasis was shown to respond very well to the therapeutic effect of TNF inhibitors.6–7 Three TNF antagonists are currently approved for the treatment of psoriasis: etanercept (a soluble receptor fusion protein), infliximab (a mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody) and adalimumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody).7 Etanercept is a fully human dimeric fusion protein, consisting of two extracellular ligand-binding domains of the human 75 kDa TNF-receptor linked to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin G1. As a TNF-receptor, etanercept competes for TNF with endogenous TNF receptors.8 Bioactive TNF can still be released to some extent from the relatively unstable TNF/etanercept complexes (contrasting with the greater stability of TNF/infliximab complexes).8 Therefore etanercept is a less potent, more balanced TNF-inhibitor than the antibodies infliximab and adalimumab. In contrast to TNF-antibodies, etanercept does not have an antigranuloma effect, explaining its lack of effectiveness in Crohn’s disease or Wegener’s granulomatosis.9–10 At the same time, it does not markedly affect the granulomatous defense against intracellular bacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.11 The half-life of etanercept is 4.3 days, considerably shorter than the antibodies. Consequently, etanercept requires more frequent administrations but is also eliminated more rapidly in case of a serious adverse event (eg, infection).12

Effectiveness of etanercept monotherapy in plaque psoriasis

One phase 2 and two phase 3, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that etanercept is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.6,13,14 The most frequently used endpoint is PASI-75, the percentage of patients achieving a 75% improvement of their PASI-score, corresponding well to the patients reaching a clear or almost clear status.6 The initially registered dosing schedule for etanercept in psoriasis consisted of twice weekly subcutaneous injections of 25 mg etanercept for 24 weeks with the possibility of doubling the dose (to 50 mg twice weekly) during the first 12 weeks.15 After each 24-week regiment, another 24-week etanercept regimen (25 mg twice weekly) can be started on relapse of the psoriasis.15 After 12 weeks of treatment, PASI-75 was achieved in 34% in patients receiving 25 mg of etanercept twice weekly and in 49% of patients receiving 50 mg twice weekly, compared with 3% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 for both comparisons with the placebo group).13 After 24 weeks, response rates improved further to 45% of patients on 25 mg twice weekly and to 54% in patients who had a dose reduction from 50 mg twice weekly the first 12 weeks to 25 mg the following 12 weeks.13 Similar results with etanercept monotherapy in psoriasis were consistently shown in another study: PASI-75 was 34% and 49% at 12 weeks and 44% and 59% at 24 weeks with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly and 50 mg twice weekly, respectively (no stepdown from 50 mg to 25 mg twice weekly occurred in this study after 12 weeks).6 Low dose etanercept (25 mg once weekly) was clearly less effective with PASI-75 of 14% and 25% at 12 and 24 weeks respectively.6 An earlier phase 2 trial revealed a PASI-75 response of 30% and 55% with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly at week 12 and 24 respectively.14 Etanercept was generally well tolerated with similar incidence of adverse events in etanercept- vs placebo-treated patients with the exception of injection-site reactions occurring more frequently with etanercept. Usually, these injection-site reactions were mild and only very rarely the reason for withdrawal from the study.6,13,14 Subgroup analysis based on an integrated database of the placebo-controlled part (first 12 weeks) of the three afore-mentioned studies6,13,14 indicated a tendency towards higher efficacy in the lower body weight group (below median of 89.36 kg) and the higher baseline PASI (above median of 16): PASI-75 with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly was 41% and 25% in the lower and higher weight subgroups and 37% and 29% in the higher and lower PASI-subgroups.16 The influence of body weight on etanercept effectiveness in psoriasis remains however highly controversial as clinical observations failed to show any correlation between body mass index and etanercept efficacy in psoriasis.17,18 The higher response to etanercept in the higher baseline PASI-subgroup16 is probably owing to the nonlinear nature of this scoring system with lower sensitivity in the lower PASI-range.19 Following etanercept discontinuation in patients who exhibited PASI-50 at week 24, a median time to relapse (defined as a loss of at least half of the improvement achieved between baseline and week 24) of 3 months was observed without cases of rebound flare (PASI increasing over 150% of baseline).20 Moreover, etanercept retreatment of these relapsed patients at the initial dose, generated a similar response at 12 weeks indicating that psoriasis patients retain clinical response to etanercept on discontinuation and retreatment with the drug.20 A recently published long-term (54 weeks) study, in which continuous etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) therapy was compared with intermittent therapy (50 mg twice weekly for maximal 12 weeks or until interruption; 25 mg twice weekly on reinitiation), confirmed that psoriasis patients continue to respond to etanercept along different cycles of discontinuation or reinitiation of the drug.21 In this study, the physician global assessment (PGA 0 to 5 score) was used to decide to discontinuation (PGA ≤ 2) or reintroduction (PGA ≥ 3) of etanercept. Compared to PASI, PGA is quick and simple to use but its intrarater- and interrater reliability is inferior (intraclass correlation coefficient of 81 and 61 for PGA, compared to 96 and 91 for PASI).19 From baseline to week 54, the mean PASI decreased by 67,6% and 59,3% in the continuous and intermittent group, respectively. PASI-75 data were not disclosed.21 Although no direct head-to-head comparison study of etanercept with other TNF-inhibitors is available in psoriasis, the antipsoriatic effect of etanercept appears somewhat lower and clearly less speedy than that of infliximab and adalimumab. 7 Very recently, the first head-to-head study of two biologics in psoriasis showed that etanercept 50 mg biweekly for 12 weeks was less effective than ustekinumab (45 mg week 0 and 4), a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the common p40 subunit of interleukin-23 and -12 (PASI-75 57% and 68% for etanercept and ustekinumab, respectively).22

Alternative and new dosing schedules

In view of etanercept’s somewhat lower efficacy in psoriasis and higher frequency of administration as compared to other TNF-inhibitors (infliximab and adalimumab),7 alternative dosing schedules were developed in order to increase effectiveness and/or convenience for the patient. A first strategy was to maintain a high etanercept dose (50 mg twice weekly) for a long-term (beyond the first 12 weeks). For that purpose, a placebo-controlled trial with open-label extension was designed in which patients were randomized to receive either placebo or etanercept (50 mg) biweekly for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, patients who remained in the study received open-label etanercept (50 mg biweekly) for 84 weeks.23 After 12 and 24 weeks, 47% and 60% of patients displayed a PASI-75 response. The PASI-75 response reached its peak at week 48, with 63% for the placebo–etanercept group and 61.1% for the etanercept–etanercept group. The percentage of patients with a PASI-75 response after 96 weeks was 51.6% for the placebo–etanercept group and 51.1% for the etanercept–etanercept group.23 The exposure-adjusted event rates were similar for both groups after 96 weeks and did not increase with long-term exposure; injection-site reactions were more frequent in the etanercept–etanercept group. Hence, it was concluded that high-dose long-term etanercept is effective and well-tolerated in psoriasis.23 The high etanercept dose used in this study (50 mg twice weekly) is however not approved beyond the first 12 weeks of treatment of psoriasis.15 A second strategy consisted of the administration of high-dose etanercept (50 mg) at a lower frequency (once weekly). An open-label extension study of the global phase 3 study with etanercept in psoriasis,13 investigated the effectiveness of etanercept 50 mg once weekly vs 25 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks in psoriasis patients who had received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly for at least 24 weeks.24 It was demonstrated that efficacy (maintenance of PASI), pharmacokinetic profile (steady-state concentration over time, area under the curve and average concentration) and safety were comparable between etanercept 25 mg twice weekly and 50 mg once weekly.24 Based on these preliminary findings, a European, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept 50 mg once weekly in 144 moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients during 12 weeks.25 In an additional 12-week, open-label extension phase, all patients received etanercept 50 mg once per week. 37,5% of patients receiving etanercept 50 mg once weekly achieved a PASI-75 response at week 12, compared to 2.2% of patients in the placebo group.25 This PASI-75 response after 12 weeks with etanercept 50 mg per week (37,5%) is comparable if not slightly higher than that with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly at week 12 in the two pivotal phase 3 trials6,13 and the phase 2 trial14 (34%, 34%, 30%, respectively). At week 24 following a 12-week open label period with etanercept 50 mg once weekly, PASI-75 responders further climbed to 71,1% in the etanercept–etanercept group (24 weeks of etanercept) and 44,4% in the placebo–etanercept group (12 weeks of etanercept).25 The 71% PASI-75 response after 24 weeks etanercept 50 mg once weekly is well above that in earlier trials with etanercept 25 mg twice a week (44%, 45%, 55%)6,13,14 and even 50 mg twice weekly (59, 60%).6,23 Possible explanations for this “outlier” include the open label design (raising high expectations with possibly increased “placebo effect” in patients and assessment bias in investigators in the second part of the study), the lower average body weight of the patients (83.4 kg in this European study compared to approximately 90 kg in North-American studies)16 and the rather high mean baseline PASI in the current study (21.4 vs 18.8 in the North-American studies).16 Apart from the well-known injection-site reactions, no new safety signals were captured.25 In conclusion, the etanercept 50 mg once a week treatment regimen was found to be very effective and well tolerated in psoriasis; hence, based on these study results, regulatory approval of this more patient-convenient etanercept dosing regimen (50 mg once weekly) was obtained in Europe for the treatment of psoriasis.15

Etanercept in pediatric psoriasis

A recent study evaluated the use of etanercept in 211 children and teenagers (aged 4 to 17 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (median PASI-score 16.4).26 This was the first large study of a systemic drug in pediatric psoriasis. Patients were injected once weekly with 0.8 mg/kg of etanercept up to a maximum of 50 mg. 57% of etanercept-treated patients achieved a PASI-75 response at week 12, compared to 11% in the placebo group (P < 0.001).26 At week 24, PASI-75 rose to 69%. There were no reports of psoriasis rebound or change in psoriasis morphology during the withdrawal-retreatment period.26 The higher clinical response with etanercept (and placebo) in the pediatric population compared to adult psoriasis patients6,13,14,25 may be partly explained by the often spontaneously remitting nature of pediatric psoriasis; in addition, the weight-based dosing of etanercept in children may be more effective than the fixed dosing in adults. Four serious adverse events occurred in three patients: ovarian cyst removal in one patient, gastroenteritis and gastroenteritis-associated dehydration in one patient, and pneumonia in one patient. All occurred in patients receiving open-label treatment, and all resolved without sequelae.26 Skin papilloma (presumably viral warts) was an adverse event that was encountered more commonly in etanercept-treated patients (16 events) than in the placebo group (no events).26 Based on this study, etanercept – as the first systemic agent – gained approval for the use of pediatric psoriasis from the age of 8 in Europe.15

Etanercept combination therapy in psoriasis

Combination therapy is a strategy that can be used to increase efficacy in recalcitrant disease (which is relevant for etanercept being the least potent anti-TNF medication for psoriasis),7 while reducing the risk for cumulative toxicity (eg, by dose reductions). The concept of cumulative toxicity is mainly derived from phototherapy (photocarcinogenesis) and systemic psoriasis therapies (nephrotoxicity for cyclosporine; hepatotoxicity for methotrexate). Hence, combination, rotational and sequential treatment strategies were developed for classical systemic agents for psoriasis.27 Until recently, biologics were thought to be spared from cumulative toxicity as they do not cause organ toxicity (especially liver and kidney damage). But the recent market withdrawal of efalizumab, due to at least three cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in psoriasis patients, all of whom on efalizumab for at least 3 years, brutally raised awareness about the possible cumulative toxicity of biologics.28 As etanercept is only approved in monotherapy for psoriasis,15 its combination with another systemic agent represents off-label use.

Topical agents

The use of topical agents (especially vitamin D analogues, steroids or a fixed combination of both) in combination with phototherapy or systemic drugs for psoriasis is beneficial and well documented.27 In clinical practice, topical drugs are also very commonly combined with biologics for psoriasis, including etanercept.29 Moreover, topical steroids of low-to-moderate strength were allowed on distinct areas (scalp, axilla, groin) in most of the psoriasis trials with etanercept.6,13,22,25,26 An expert consensus conference on etanercept treatment of psoriasis recommended the use of topical medication in combination with etanercept, especially at the start of therapy to increase the speed of therapeutic response.30 Nevertheless, formal evidence from published clinical trials combining a biologic with a topical agent is still very sparse and even lacking for etanercept. Very recently, a 16-week randomized controlled study in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis was conducted to assess the efficacy of adalimumab plus calcipotriol– betamethasonedipropionate fixed-combination ointment vs adalimumab plus placebo ointment.31 The vitamin D-steroid fixed combination ointment accelerated the response to adalimumab during the first 4 weeks of treatment, but did not offer benefit beyond 4 weeks compared to adalimumab plus placebo ointment.31

Acitretin

Acitretin is a highly interesting candidate for combination therapy with biologics as it is not an immunosuppressive agent. Moreover, its chemopreventive properties against skin carcinogenesis32 are of great value in the high risk moderate-to-severe psoriasis population, where etanercept (like most other systemic psoriasis treatments) appears to increase the risk for squamous cell carcinoma.33 A recent Italian 24-week pilot study on 60 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated that the addition of acitretin 0.4 mg/kg/day to etanercept 25 mg once weekly was as effective (PASI-75 44%) as etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (PASI-75 45%).34 Based on these data, acitretin can be viewed as ‘etanercept-sparing’ and cost-reducing. As the combination of acitretin with etanercept at its normal dosing regimen was not performed in this trial, it remains unclear whether acitretin is able to bring etanercept’s effectiveness to a higher level. A retrospective review of 15 psoriasis patients treated with concomitant acitretin (10 to 50 mg/day) and biologics (etanercept in 4 patients) concluded that this scheme was promising for the management of refractory psoriasis.35 Similar reports on acitretin–etanercept combination in psoriasis were described in two case series.29,36 Finally, a stable dose of acitretin (≤50 mg/day) was allowed in a recent study of continuous vs paused etanercept therapy of psoriasis21 (see section on effectiveness of etanercept monotherapy above for a brief outline of this study).

Methotrexate

Etanercept–methotrexate combination therapy is well established to increase efficacy in rheumatologic patients with insufficient response to monotherapy with either of the agents.37 Consequently, psoriasis patients with concomitant poorly controlled psoriatic arthritis may benefit from this combination. Furthermore, methotrexate can also be combined with TNF-antibodies such as infliximab in order to reduce the formation of neutralizing antibodies to the TNF-antagonist.38 A recent Scandinavian 24-week study in 59 psoriasis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate monotherapy compared etanercept in combination with a stable methotrexate dose with etanercept in combination with a tapered methotrexate dose (gradual tapering and discontinuation over the first 4 weeks of the trial).39 Etanercept was administered at a dose of 50 mg twice weekly the first 12 weeks, followed by 25 mg twice weekly for the remaining 12 weeks. At week 24, a significantly higher portion of patients (70%) achieved PASI-75 in the group with stable methotrexate dose than in the methotrexate-tapered group (37%).39 A case series with six psoriasis patients showed that etanercept may be used as a means of tapering methotrexate while maintaining good clinical control. The patients received methotrexate at a starting dose of 10 mg per week with incremental increases to achieve a PASI-50 response. Etanercept was then added (50 mg/week) and methotrexate tapered by 2.5 mg/week every 2 to 4 weeks until discontinued.40 The PASI-50 response on methotrexate monotherapy was 56.3%. This clinical improvement was sustained in 3 of 6 patients after discontinuation of methotrexate. Two patients had a relapse of psoriasis (loss of at least 50% of PASI improvement) when methotrexate was stopped but this was resolved by increasing etanercept to 50 mg twice weekly.40 A Dutch case series demonstrated that the introduction of methotrexate to psoriasis patients with insufficient response to etanercept resulted in clear improvement in 4 of 6 patients.41 In addition, 5 of 6 patients, who were already on methotrexate before the introduction of etanercept and who subsequently discontinued methotrexate, experienced a decrease in PASI improvement.41 In the same centre, methotrexate appeared to be the systemic agent that was most frequently combined with etanercept.29 In a recent study of continuous vs paused etanercept therapy of psoriasis, patients were allowed to continue a stable dose of methotrexate (≤20 mg/week).21 In the aforementioned studies, tolerability of etanercept–methotrexate combination was good and there were no signs of increased toxicity on the short term.39,40 Long-term safety of etanercept-methotrexate combination therapy is obviously a major concern but it is reassuring that a 2-year study in more than 500 rheumatoid arthritis patients did not reveal increased toxicity (including serious infectious and non-infectious adverse events) in the etanercept–methotrexate combination group vs etanercept or methotrexate monotherapy groups.42

Cyclosporine

Despite the incidental use of cyclosporine–etanercept combination therapy in high-need psoriasis patients,29 this combination is not recommended from a safety perspective. Apart from being an immunosuppressive, cyclosporine also induces cancer progression in mice, independently from its immune effects.43 These theoretical considerations together with the absence of clinical safety data warrant great caution for the combination of cyclosporine with TNF-inhibitors (including etanercept), which probably bear an increased risk for severe infection and malignancy (including skin cancer) themselves.33,44,45

Phototherapy

A recently published, multicenter, open-label, single arm study investigated the antipsoriatic effect of narrow band-UVB (thrice weekly) in combination with etanercept (50 mg twice weekly) in 86 plaque psoriasis patients. An impressive 84.9% of patients achieved PASI-75 at week 12.46 Similarly, a small, prospective, randomized, half-side study was conducted in 5 psoriasis patients who did not exhibit a PASI-75 response after 6 weeks of etanercept 50 mg twice weekly. A random half-side of the body was treated with narrow-band UVB in the next 6 weeks while continuing etanercept at an unchanged dose. At week 12, the mean PASI reduction (based on half-side PASI) was 89% at irradiated vs 68% at nonirradiated body side.47 Despite increased efficacy along with a good safety and tolerability profile on the short term,46,47 TNF-inhibitor–UVB combination therapy raises strong safety concerns from the long-term perspective. This vision is based on the highly controversial and unclarified role of TNF in epidermal carcinogenesis: on the one hand, TNF-knockout mice are resistant to chemical skin carcinogenesis48 but at the same time TNF is a critical factor for tumor immune surveillance.49 Indeed, knowing that UV-dependent DNA damage induces TNF,50 and that UVB-induced TNF mediates apoptosis in keratinocytes51, induction of TNF by UVB may represent a mechanism to eliminate mutated (precancerous) cells. This view is underscored by the increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma in psoriasis patients receiving etanercept.33 Until the uncertainty about the role of TNF in photocarcinogenesis is fully resolved by preclinical research, it is therefore more cautious not to combine TNF-inhibitors with phototherapy.

Conclusion

The initially approved dosing for etanercept in psoriasis consisted of 25 mg twice weekly in repeated 24-week cycles with the possibility of doubling the dose in the very first 12 weeks. Recently a new dosing schedule of etanercept 50 mg once weekly was approved based on a PASI-75 of 37% and 71% at week 12 and 24. Etanercept was also approved in children with psoriasis from the age of 8 at a dosing of 0.8 mg/kg (up to 50 mg) once weekly resulting in a PASI-75 of 57% and 69% following 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Several small clinical trials and case series have shown increased efficacy of etanercept in combination with acitretin, methotrexate or UVB, whereas data are lacking for the combination with cyclosporine or topical drugs. From a safety perspective, the combination with acitretin (nonimmunosuppressive) or methotrexate (long-term safety data in rheumatology) are interesting, whereas the combination with cyclosporine or phototherapy holds a theoretical risk for increased (photo)carcinogenesis.
Table 1

Overview of PASI-75 responses to etanercept in different dosing schedules and combinations in clinical studies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

Dosing schedule12-weekPASI-7524-weekPASI-75Reference
Etanercept monotherapy in adult psoriasis
25 mg once weekly14%25%6
25 mg twice weekly34%44%6
34%45%13
30%55%14
20%45%34
50 mg once weekly37,5%71%25
50 mg twice weekly 12 weeks + 25 mg twice weekly 12 weeks54%13
50 mg twice weekly49%59%6
49%13
47%60%23
57%22
Etanercept monotherapy in pediatric psoriasis
0.8 mg/kg once weekly (max 50 mg)57%69%26
Etanercept combination therapy in adult psoriasis
25 mg once weekly + acitretin 0.4 mg/kg/day15%44%34
50 mg twice weekly + narrow band UVB (thrice weekly)84,9%46
  45 in total

1.  Serum TNF-alpha levels correlate with disease severity and are reduced by effective therapy in plaque-type psoriasis.

Authors:  A Mussi; C Bonifati; M Carducci; G D'Agosto; F Pimpinelli; D D'Urso; L D'Auria; M Fazio; F Ameglio
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.711

2.  Recommendations for the use of etanercept in psoriasis: a European dermatology expert group consensus.

Authors:  W-H Boehncke; R A Brasie; J Barker; S Chimenti; E Daudén; M de Rie; L Dubertret; A Giannetti; A Katsambas; K Kragballe; J M Naeyaert; J-P Ortonne; J Peyrí; J C Prinz; J-H Saurat; R Strohal; P van de Kerkhof; W Sterry
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Severine Vermeire; Gert Van Assche; Geert D' Haens; An Carbonez; Paul Rutgeerts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction.

Authors:  K A Papp; S Tyring; M Lahfa; J Prinz; C E M Griffiths; A M Nakanishi; R Zitnik; P C M van de Kerkhof; Linda Melvin
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  TNF-alpha is critical for antitumor but not antiviral T cell immunity in mice.

Authors:  Thomas Calzascia; Marc Pellegrini; Håkan Hall; Laurent Sabbagh; Nobuyuki Ono; Alisha R Elford; Tak W Mak; Pamela S Ohashi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Utilization of narrow-band ultraviolet light B therapy and etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis (UNITE): efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Leon Kircik; Jerry Bagel; Neil Korman; Alan Menter; Craig A Elmets; John Koo; Yu-Ching Yang; Chiun-Fang Chiou; Frank Dann; Seth R Stevens
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.114

7.  Psoriasis treatment with etanercept and efalizumab: clinical strategies influencing treatment outcome.

Authors:  R J B Driessen; M A M Berends; J B Boezeman; P C M van de Kerkhof; E M G J de Jong
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  The safety and efficacy of adding etanercept to methotrexate or methotrexate to etanercept in moderately active rheumatoid arthritis patients previously treated with monotherapy.

Authors:  D van der Heijde; G Burmester; J Melo-Gomes; C Codreanu; E Martin Mola; R Pedersen; B Freundlich; D J Chang
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Granulomatous infectious diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists.

Authors:  R S Wallis; M S Broder; J Y Wong; M E Hanson; D O Beenhouwer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Influence and variation of the body mass index in patients treated with etanercept for plaque-type psoriasis.

Authors:  M Esposito; A Mazzotta; R Saraceno; C Schipani; S Chimenti
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.