RATIONALE: Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) generates cyclic guanosine monophophate (cGMP) upon activation by nitric oxide (NO). Cardiac NO-sGC-cGMP signaling blunts cardiac stress responses, including pressure-overload-induced hypertrophy. The latter itself depresses signaling through this pathway by reducing NO generation and enhancing cGMP hydrolysis. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that the sGC response to NO also declines with pressure-overload stress and assessed the role of heme-oxidation and altered intracellular compartmentation of sGC as potential mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: C57BL/6 mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC) developed cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. NO-stimulated sGC activity was markedly depressed, whereas NO- and heme-independent sGC activation by BAY 60-2770 was preserved. Total sGCα(1) and β(1) expression were unchanged by TAC; however, sGCβ(1) subunits shifted out of caveolin-enriched microdomains. NO-stimulated sGC activity was 2- to 3-fold greater in Cav3-containing lipid raft versus nonlipid raft domains in control and 6-fold greater after TAC. In contrast, BAY 60-2770 responses were >10 fold higher in non-Cav3 domains with and without TAC, declining about 60% after TAC within each compartment. Mice genetically lacking Cav3 had reduced NO- and BAY-stimulated sGC activity in microdomains containing Cav3 for controls but no change within non-Cav3-enriched domains. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure overload depresses NO/heme-dependent sGC activation in the heart, consistent with enhanced oxidation. The data reveal a novel additional mechanism for reduced NO-coupled sGC activity related to dynamic shifts in membrane microdomain localization, with Cav3-microdomains protecting sGC from heme-oxidation and facilitating NO responsiveness. Translocation of sGC out of this domain favors sGC oxidation and contributes to depressed NO-stimulated sGC activity.
RATIONALE: Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) generates cyclic guanosine monophophate (cGMP) upon activation by nitric oxide (NO). Cardiac NO-sGC-cGMP signaling blunts cardiac stress responses, including pressure-overload-induced hypertrophy. The latter itself depresses signaling through this pathway by reducing NO generation and enhancing cGMP hydrolysis. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that the sGC response to NO also declines with pressure-overload stress and assessed the role of heme-oxidation and altered intracellular compartmentation of sGC as potential mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: C57BL/6 mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC) developed cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. NO-stimulated sGC activity was markedly depressed, whereas NO- and heme-independent sGC activation by BAY 60-2770 was preserved. Total sGCα(1) and β(1) expression were unchanged by TAC; however, sGCβ(1) subunits shifted out of caveolin-enriched microdomains. NO-stimulated sGC activity was 2- to 3-fold greater in Cav3-containing lipid raft versus nonlipid raft domains in control and 6-fold greater after TAC. In contrast, BAY 60-2770 responses were >10 fold higher in non-Cav3 domains with and without TAC, declining about 60% after TAC within each compartment. Mice genetically lacking Cav3 had reduced NO- and BAY-stimulated sGC activity in microdomains containing Cav3 for controls but no change within non-Cav3-enriched domains. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure overload depresses NO/heme-dependent sGC activation in the heart, consistent with enhanced oxidation. The data reveal a novel additional mechanism for reduced NO-coupled sGC activity related to dynamic shifts in membrane microdomain localization, with Cav3-microdomains protecting sGC from heme-oxidation and facilitating NO responsiveness. Translocation of sGC out of this domain favors sGC oxidation and contributes to depressed NO-stimulated sGC activity.
Authors: Ulrike Zabel; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Phil Oh; Pavel Nedvetsky; Albert Smolenski; Helmut Müller; Petra Kronich; Peter Kugler; Ulrich Walter; Jan E Schnitzer; Harald H H W Schmidt Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Yousuke T Horikawa; Mathivadhani Panneerselvam; Yoshitaka Kawaraguchi; Yasuo M Tsutsumi; Sameh S Ali; Ravi C Balijepalli; Fiona Murray; Brian P Head; Ingrid R Niesman; Timo Rieg; Volker Vallon; Paul A Insel; Hemal H Patel; David M Roth Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard C Venema; Virginia J Venema; Hong Ju; M Brennan Harris; Connie Snead; Tamas Jilling; Christiana Dimitropoulou; Michael E Maragoudakis; John D Catravas Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: D Koesling; J Herz; H Gausepohl; F Niroomand; K D Hinsch; A Mülsch; E Böhme; G Schultz; R Frank Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 1988-10-24 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Jörg W Wegener; Hermann Nawrath; Wiebke Wolfsgruber; Susanne Kühbandner; Claudia Werner; Franz Hofmann; Robert Feil Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-01-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: T Tatsumi; S Matoba; A Kawahara; N Keira; J Shiraishi; K Akashi; M Kobara; T Tanaka; M Katamura; C Nakagawa; B Ohta; T Shirayama; K Takeda; J Asayama; H Fliss; M Nakagawa Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Scott E Woodman; David S Park; Alex W Cohen; Michelle W-C Cheung; Madhulika Chandra; Jamshid Shirani; Baiyu Tang; Linda A Jelicks; Richard N Kitsis; George J Christ; Stephen M Factor; Herbert B Tanowitz; Michael P Lisanti Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-07-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: F Galbiati; J A Engelman; D Volonte; X L Zhang; C Minetti; M Li; H Hou; B Kneitz; W Edelmann; M P Lisanti Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-03-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nadiia Rozmaritsa; Torsten Christ; David R Van Wagoner; Hannelore Haase; Johannes-Peter Stasch; Klaus Matschke; Ursula Ravens Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Yogananda S Markandeya; Laura J Phelan; Marites T Woon; Alexis M Keefe; Courtney R Reynolds; Benjamin K August; Timothy A Hacker; David M Roth; Hemal H Patel; Ravi C Balijepalli Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Andrew W Holt; Danielle N Martin; Patti R Shaver; Shaquria P Adderley; Joshua D Stone; Chintamani N Joshi; Jake T Francisco; Robert M Lust; Douglas A Weidner; Brian M Shewchuk; David A Tulis Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Brittany G Durgin; Scott A Hahn; Heidi M Schmidt; Megan P Miller; Neha Hafeez; Ilka Mathar; Daniel Freitag; Peter Sandner; Adam C Straub Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-10-03
Authors: Rohan C Shah; Subramaniam Sanker; Katherine C Wood; Brittany G Durgin; Adam C Straub Journal: Nitric Oxide Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.427
Authors: Danielle M Trappanese; Yuchuan Liu; Ryan C McCormick; Alessandro Cannavo; Gayani Nanayakkara; Marina M Baskharoun; Harish Jarrett; Felix J Woitek; D Michael Tillson; A Ray Dillon; Fabio A Recchia; Jean-Luc Balligand; Steven R Houser; Walter J Koch; Louis J Dell'Italia; Emily J Tsai Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Walter Z Wang; Allan W Jones; Meifang Wang; William Durante; Ronald J Korthuis Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 4.733