Literature DB >> 22094118

Motor abundance supports multitasking while standing.

Wei-Li Hsu1, John P Scholz.   

Abstract

Many activities require simultaneous performance of multiple tasks. Motor redundancy may provide a key mechanism for multitasking, ensuring minimal inter-task interference. This study investigated the effect of performing two supra-postural tasks on postural stability. The component of joint configuration variance (JCV) reflecting flexible joint combinations (V(UCM)) that stabilize the center of mass (CoM) position and the component of JCV leading to variability (V(ORT)) of the CoM were determined using the Uncontrolled Manifold (UCM) approach. Subjects executed a targeting task alone or in combination with a ball-balancing task. UCM analysis revealed that the joints were coordinated such that their combined variance reflected primarily V(UCM), without a substantial effect on CoM position stability. Evidence for this flexible control strategy increased when the ball-balancing task was added to targeting, or when the index of difficulty of targeting increased, both without leading to substantial increases in V(ORT) or CoM position variance. The increase in joint variance when performing additional tasks without affecting adversely CoM position stability supports the hypothesis that the nervous system takes advantage of available motor redundancy for the successful performance of multiple tasks concurrently. Future work is needed to investigate the limits of this control scheme.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22094118      PMCID: PMC3288691          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  60 in total

1.  Fear of falling modifies anticipatory postural control.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; James S Frank; Mark G Carpenter; Gerhard W Peysar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Postural control: visual and cognitive manipulations.

Authors:  M C Hunter; M A Hoffman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The effect of age on the attentional demands of postural control.

Authors:  A P Marsh; S E Geel
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Motor equivalence and self-motion induced by different movement speeds.

Authors:  J P Scholz; T Dwight-Higgin; J E Lynch; Y W Tseng; V Martin; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Anticipatory postural adjustments during self-paced and reaction-time movements.

Authors:  S De Wolf; H Slijper; M L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach.

Authors:  E Saltzman; J A Kelso
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena.

Authors:  B G Bardy; L Marin; T A Stoffregen; R J Bootsma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A dual-task study of interference between mental activity and control of balance.

Authors:  G Andersson; L Yardley; L Luxon
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Coordination of muscle torques stabilizes upright standing posture: an UCM analysis.

Authors:  Eunse Park; Hendrik Reimann; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in joint coordination during balance recovery.

Authors:  Wei-Li Hsu; Li-Shan Chou; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-05-18

3.  Use of motor abundance in old adults in the regulation of a narrow-based stance.

Authors:  Wei-Li Hsu; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Rong-Sen Yang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Recommendation for the minimum number of steps to analyze when performing the uncontrolled manifold analysis on walking data.

Authors:  Noah J Rosenblatt; Christopher P Hurt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The coordination of joint movements during sit-to-stand motion in old adults: the uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Masaya Anan; Hiroka Hattori; Kenji Tanimoto; Yoshio Wakimoto; Takuya Ibara; Nobuhiro Kito; Koichi Shinkoda
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2017-11-30

6.  Older but not younger adults rely on multijoint coordination to stabilize the swinging limb when performing a novel cued walking task.

Authors:  Noah J Rosenblatt; Nils Eckardt; Daniel Kuhman; Christopher P Hurt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  A geometry- and muscle-based control architecture for synthesising biological movement.

Authors:  Johannes R Walter; Michael Günther; Daniel F B Haeufle; Syn Schmitt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Functional synergies underlying control of upright posture during changes in head orientation.

Authors:  Eunse Park; Gregor Schöner; John P Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Physical Demand but Not Dexterity Is Associated with Motor Flexibility during Rapid Reaching in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Christian Greve; Tibor Hortobàgyi; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Not all is lost: old adults retain flexibility in motor behaviour during sit-to-stand.

Authors:  Christian Greve; Wiebren Zijlstra; Tibor Hortobágyi; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.