Literature DB >> 22093876

Distribution of a marker of germline methylation differs between major families of transposon-derived repeats in the human genome.

Martin I Sigurdsson1, Albert V Smith, Hans T Bjornsson, Jon J Jonsson.   

Abstract

A potential relationship between transposon-derived repeats (TDR) and human germline methylation is of biological importance since many genes are flanked by TDR and methylation could affect the expression of nearby genes. Furthermore, DNA methylation has been suggested as a global defense mechanism against genome instability threatened by TDR. We studied the correlation between the density of HapMap methyl-associated SNPs (mSNPs), a marker of germline methylation, and proportion of TDR. After correcting for confounding variables, we found a negative correlation between proportion of Alu repeats and mSNP density for 125-1000 kb windows. Similar results were found for the most active subgroup of repeats. In contrast, a negative correlation between proportion of L1 repeats and mSNP density was found only in the larger 1000 kb windows. Using methylation data on germ cells (sperm) from the Human Epigenome Project, we found a lower proportion of Alu repeats adjacent (3-15 kb) to hypermethylated amplicons. On the contrary, there was a higher proportion of L1 repeats in the 3-5 kb of sequence flanking hypermethylated amplicons but not in the 10-15 kb flanks. Our data indicate a differential response to the major repeat families and that DNA methylation is unlikely to be a uniform global defense system against all TDR. It appears to play a role for the L1 subgroup, with sequences adjacent to L1 repeats methylated in response to their proximity. In contrast, sequences adjacent to Alu repeats appear to be hypomethylated, arguing against a role of methylation in germline defense against those elements.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093876      PMCID: PMC3475724          DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  46 in total

1.  The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool.

Authors:  Donna Karolchik; Angela S Hinrichs; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Charles W Sugnet; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  CpG methylation modifies the genetic stability of cloned repeat sequences.

Authors:  Kerrie Nichol; Christopher E Pearson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Isolation of an active human transposable element.

Authors:  B A Dombroski; S L Mathias; E Nanthakumar; A F Scott; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Models of repression of transposition in P-M hybrid dysgenesis by P cytotype and by zygotically encoded repressor proteins.

Authors:  J F Brookfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Retrovirus-induced de novo methylation of flanking host sequences correlates with gene inactivity.

Authors:  D Jähner; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 13-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A mouse model of human L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Eric M Ostertag; Ralph J DeBerardinis; John L Goodier; Yue Zhang; Nuo Yang; George L Gerton; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Differences in DNA methylation during oogenesis and spermatogenesis and their persistence during early embryogenesis in the mouse.

Authors:  J P Sanford; H J Clark; V M Chapman; J Rossant
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The insertional history of an active family of L1 retrotransposons in humans.

Authors:  Stéphane Boissinot; Ali Entezam; Lynn Young; Peter J Munson; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences.

Authors:  Marie Dewannieux; Cécile Esnault; Thierry Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts.

Authors:  A P Feinberg; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Epigenetic Consequences of Paternal Exposure to Environmental Contaminants and Reproductive Toxicants.

Authors:  Molly S Estill; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-09

2.  Tumor DNA hypomethylation of LINE-1 is associated with low tumor grade of breast cancer in Tunisian patients.

Authors:  Hayet Radia Zeggar; Alexandre How-Kit; Antoine Daunay; Ilhem Bettaieb; Mourad Sahbatou; Khaled Rahal; Olfa Adouni; Amor Gammoudi; Hayet Douik; Jean-François Deleuze; Maher Kharrat
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Dynamic Alu methylation during normal development, aging, and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Yanting Luo; Xuemei Lu; Hehuang Xie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.