Literature DB >> 22093874

Evaluation of the NOD/SCID xenograft model for glucocorticoid-regulated gene expression in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Vivek A Bhadri1, Mark J Cowley, Warren Kaplan, Toby N Trahair, Richard B Lock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone are critical drugs used in multi-agent chemotherapy protocols used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and response to glucocorticoids is highly predictive of outcome. The NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model of ALL is a clinically relevant model in which the mice develop a systemic leukemia which retains the fundamental biological characteristics of the original disease. Here we report a study evaluating the NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model to investigate glucocorticoid-induced gene expression. Cells from a glucocorticoid-sensitive xenograft derived from a child with B-cell precursor ALL were inoculated into NOD/SCID mice. When highly engrafted the mice were randomized into groups of 4 to receive dexamethasone 15 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection or vehicle control. Leukemia cells were harvested from mice spleens at 0, 8, 24 or 48 hours thereafter, and gene expression analyzed on Illumina WG-6_V3 chips, comparing all groups to time 0 hours.
RESULTS: The 8 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoint had the highest number of significantly differentially expressed genes, with fewer observed at the 24 and 48 hour timepoints, and with minimal changes seen across the time-matched controls. When compared to publicly available datasets of glucocorticoid-induced gene expression from an in vitro cell line study and from an in vivo study of patients with ALL, at the level of pathways, expression changes in the 8 hour xenograft samples showed a similar response to patients treated with glucocorticoids. Replicate analysis revealed that at the 8 hour timepoint, a dataset with high signal and differential expression, using data from 3 replicates instead of 4 resulted in excellent recovery scores of > 0.9. However at other timepoints with less signal very poor recovery scores were obtained with 3 replicates.
CONCLUSIONS: The NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model provides a reproducible experimental system in which to investigate clinically-relevant mechanisms of drug-induced gene regulation in ALL; the 8 hour timepoint provides the highest number of significantly differentially expressed genes; time-matched controls are redundant and excellent recovery scores can be obtained with 3 replicates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093874      PMCID: PMC3228854          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Glucocorticoids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone are critical components of multi-agent chemotherapy protocols used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [1] due to their ability to induce apoptosis in lymphoid cells. Despite their use for over 50 years their mechanism of action is not completely understood. Glucocorticoids are steroid hormones that act on target cells through interaction with a specific glucocorticoid receptor (GR) [2]. The GR is held in a cytosolic complex by a number of co-chaperone molecules including HSP-90 and HSP-70 [3], and on ligand binding dissociates from the co-chaperone complex, dimerizes and is transported to the nucleus where it binds to palindromic DNA sequences known as glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) found in the promoter regions of target genes [4]. This leads to the activation of transcription of primary target genes, repression of transcription through interaction with negative GREs [5] or of gene activation through transcription factors such as AP-1 and NF-ΚB [6]. In lymphoid cells, this results in repression of cell cycle progression through cyclin-D3 and C-MYC [7], and cell death through the activation of apoptosis. Glucocorticoids also induce other non-apoptotic mechanisms of programmed cell death including autophagy [8] and mediate a number of pathways involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. A number of studies have published microarray data of glucocorticoid-induced genes in lymphoid cells, but comparison of the data is complicated by technical differences in platform and chip type. Previous studies of glucocorticoid-induced genes in ALL have been carried out using in vitro cell-line models [9-15] and patient-derived cells, both in vivo [16] and in vitro [17]. Cell lines are extensively used in the study of ALL but in the process of immortalization acquire multiple genetic defects, particularly in the p53 pathway [18], and mechanisms demonstrated in cell lines are often not replicated in more clinically relevant models. Primary patient cells have a finite supply and rarely survive ex vivo for more than a few days. The non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) xenograft mouse model is widely used to study ALL. In this model, human leukemia cells obtained from diagnostic bone marrow biopsies are inoculated into NOD/SCID mice, and on engraftment establish a systemic leukemia which retains the fundamental biological characteristics of the original disease [19]. It has also been shown that the in vivo responses to chemotherapeutic agents, including dexamethasone, correlates with patient outcome [20], and thus the NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model provides a stable, reproducible and clinically relevant model with which to study ALL. Here we report the first study investigating glucocorticoid-induced gene expression in ALL using the NOD/SCID xenograft model, the optimal experimental design, and a comparison of our microarray data to publicly available datasets of glucocorticoid-induced genes in other experimental models.

Methods

NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model

All experimental studies were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee and the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the University of New South Wales. ALL-3, a glucocorticoid-sensitive xenograft derived from a 12 year old girl with mixed lineage leukemia (MLL)-rearranged BCP-ALL, was chosen for this study. Although MLL-rearranged ALL is associated with a poor prednisolone response and an inferior outcome [21], this patient is currently a long-term survivor. ALL-3 demonstrates in vitro glucocorticoid sensitivity, with an IC50 of 9.4 nM on exposure to dexamethasone. In the in vivo NOD/SCID xenograft mouse model, ALL-3 is highly responsive to 4 weeks of treatment with single agent dexamethasone, with rapid clearance of leukemic blasts from the peripheral blood and recurrence of leukemia delayed by 63.4 days compared to vehicle-treated controls [20]. Cells from ALL-3 were inoculated by tail-vein injection into 28 NOD/SCID mice. The mice were bled weekly and the samples stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-murine CD45 and allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-human CD45 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Following lysis of erythrocytes with FACS lysing solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), samples were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry on a FACSCanto cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Engraftment was calculated as the proportion of human versus total CD45+ cells. When high level (> 70%) engraftment was achieved in the peripheral blood, between 8 and 10 weeks post-transplantation, the mice were randomized and split into groups of 4 to receive either dexamethasone 15 mg/kg (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) or vehicle control by intraperitoneal injection. Mice were culled by CO2 asphyxiation at 0 hours (pre-treatment, group 1), 8 hours (groups 2 and 3), 24 hours (groups 4 and 5) or 48 hours (groups 6 and 7) following treatment. The mice in groups 6 and 7 received a second dose of dexamethasone or vehicle control at 24 hours. Two mice succumbed early to thymoma, a well-recognized complication in NOD/SCID mice, resulting in 3 mice in each of groups 6 and 7. Cell suspensions of spleens were prepared and mononuclear cells enriched and purified to > 97% human by density gradient centrifugation using LymphoPrep (Axis-Shield, Norway), and cell viability assessed by trypan blue exclusion. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the RNA integrity verified (Agilent Bioanalyzer, Santa Clara, CA). The RNA was amplified using the Illumina TotalPrep RNA amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) and hybridized onto Illumina WG-6_V3 chips (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The chips were scanned on the Illumina Bead Array Reader (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and gene expression analyzed. The data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus [22] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE30392 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE30392.

Gene expression and functional analysis

The sample probe profiles with no normalization or background correction were exported from BeadStudio (version 3.0.14, Illumina, San Diego, CA). The data were pre-processed using variance stabilizing transformation [23] and robust spline normalization in lumi [24] which takes advantage of each probe being represented by > 25 beads. Differential gene expression was determined using limma [25] by comparing all treated groups to time 0 hours, with the positive False Discovery Rate correction for multiple testing [26]. Complete linkage hierarchical clustering using Euclidian distance was used to compare groups to each other. Functional analysis was performed using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) version 2.04 [27], comparing the limma moderated t-statistic for each probe in a pre-ranked file, against the c2_all collection of gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database [27] version 2.5 with 1000 permutations. The similarity of the top 100 up- and down-regulated genesets was assessed using meta-GSEA (Cowley et al, manuscript in preparation).

Comparison of models

The molecular response to glucocorticoids in xenografts was compared to publicly available microarray data [13,16] using parametric analysis of gene set enrichment [28] implemented in the PGSEA package (version 1.20.1, Furge and Dykema) from the Bioconductor project [29], with some modifications to the algorithm to assess significance of the genes that are in the geneset and represented on the microarray, and to allow more control over control sample specification (available upon request). Expression levels of each gene in each sample were converted to expression ratios relative to patient matched controls before glucocorticoid treatment (Schmidt et al), time-matched controls (Rainer et al), or time 0 hours (xenografts). Within each dataset, these gene-level ratios were summarized into geneset-level Z-scores, using PGSEA with genesets from the c2_all collection [27]. The Z-scores from each sample from the 3 studies were combined and then compared by hierarchical clustering of the top 100 gene sets demonstrating the greatest variance across the combined studies.

Replicate analysis

The stability of results when reducing the number of replicates was assessed using the Recovery Score method [30] from the GeneSelector package (version 1.4.0) of the Bioconductor project [29].

Results and Discussion

It has been demonstrated that changes in gene expression can be detected as early as 6 hours after treatment of ALL with glucocorticoids in vivo [16] and in vitro [11], although earlier timepoints show few, if any, significantly differentially expressed genes [17]. In this study the 8 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoint demonstrated the highest number of differentially expressed genes compared to baseline control, with far fewer observed at the 24 and 48 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoints (Tables 1 and 2, and Figure 1). Whilst a similar proportion of up- and down-regulated genes were identified at the 8 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoint (1158 vs 1072 respectively, FDR < 0.05), of those with large fold changes (FC > 2 or FC < 0.5, red dots in Figure 1A), 75% were up regulated (199 vs 65 respectively), consistent with the predominant role of glucocorticoids as transcriptional activators. The large numbers of statistically differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05) with small fold changes (0.5 < FC < 2) are indicative of both small measurement error across replicates, and thus the high reproducibility of the xenograft model, and good experimental power resulting from using 4 replicates. There was minimal significant differential gene expression across the time-matched controls (Tables 1 and 2). This demonstrates that in the xenograft mouse model, the 8 hour timepoint provides the greatest information, and that these changes are not sustained over later timepoints. The handling of the mice and intraperitoneal vehicle control injections had minimal effect on gene expression, and thus time-matched controls are redundant.
Table 1

Number of differentially expressed genes by False Discovery Rate (FDR), compared to time 0 hours.

Timepoint (hours)FDR < 0.25FDR < 0.1FDR < 0.05
+-+-+-
Dex 8231324341470142311581072
Dex 24970108727342175195
Dex 4832132741951244
Con 8000000
Con 24010101
Con 48010101

+ upregulated; - downregulated; Dex, dexamethasone-treated; and Con, control

Table 2

Number of differentially expressed genes by Fold Change (FC), compared to time 0 hours.

Timepoint (hours)FC > 1.5FC > 2FC > 4
+-+-+-
Dex 850142920168380
Dex 24137341159000
Dex 487923456903
Con 81371200
Con 24150000
Con 487340200

+ upregulated; - downregulated; Dex, dexamethasone-treated; and Con, control

Figure 1

Volcano plots of significantly differentially expressed genes following treatment with dexamethasone at 8 hours (A), 24 hours (B), 48 hours (C). Significance was defined as log2 Fold Change > 1 or < -1 with False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05. Each dot represents a single gene, and significant genes indicated by red dots.

Number of differentially expressed genes by False Discovery Rate (FDR), compared to time 0 hours. + upregulated; - downregulated; Dex, dexamethasone-treated; and Con, control Number of differentially expressed genes by Fold Change (FC), compared to time 0 hours. + upregulated; - downregulated; Dex, dexamethasone-treated; and Con, control Volcano plots of significantly differentially expressed genes following treatment with dexamethasone at 8 hours (A), 24 hours (B), 48 hours (C). Significance was defined as log2 Fold Change > 1 or < -1 with False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05. Each dot represents a single gene, and significant genes indicated by red dots. At the 8 hour timepoint, there were 173 genes upregulated with a t-statistic (the ratio of fold change to standard error) > 10 and 25 genes downregulated with a t-statistic < -10 (corresponding to P < 1.74 × 10-9 and FDR < 2.95 × 10-7, table 3). None of these genes had sustained expression changes at 24 or 48 hours, and although this could potentially reflect the early death of sensitive cells, there was no significant difference in the total number of cells harvested from the spleens at any timepoint compared to the time-matched controls (data not shown), and all harvests had a cell viability of ≥ 96%.
Table 3

Genes regulated 8 hours following dexamethasone treatment.

ProbeSet IDGenetPFDRDefinition
Upregulated
ILMN_5080450ZBTB1683.77< 2.2E-16< 2.2E-16zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16
ILMN_3800088MMP753.22< 2.2E-16< 2.2E-16matrix metallopeptidase 7
ILMN_1770593CH25H53.14< 2.2E-16< 2.2E-16cholesterol 25-hydroxylase
ILMN_6560328C6orf8544.60< 2.2E-16< 2.2E-16chromosome 6 open reading frame 85
ILMN_7570561TSC22D339.16< 2.2E-16< 2.2E-16TSC22 domain family, member 3
ILMN_580187PDE8B33.88< 2.2E-163.90E-16phosphodiesterase 8B
ILMN_5130066C8orf6133.82< 2.2E-163.90E-16chromosome 8 open reading frame 61
ILMN_4120431TMEM10031.38< 2.2E-161.64E-15transmembrane protein 100
ILMN_650553BIN129.76< 2.2E-164.43E-15bridging integrator 1
ILMN_1400373SLA29.57< 2.2E-164.63E-15Src-like-adaptor
ILMN_6330593PTHR129.28< 2.2E-165.22E-15parathyroid hormone receptor 1
ILMN_6110037LILRA329.04< 2.2E-165.75E-15leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily A, member 3
ILMN_4150477LOXL428.67< 2.2E-166.66E-15lysyl oxidase-like 4
ILMN_2680079OGFRL128.65< 2.2E-166.66E-15opioid growth factor receptor-like 1
ILMN_4210411NDRG228.20< 2.2E-168.62E-15NDRG family member 2
ILMN_3780093LILRA127.86< 2.2E-161.05E-14leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily A, member 1
ILMN_240441IL1R227.46< 2.2E-161.33E-14interleukin 1 receptor, type II
ILMN_4730315MERTK26.14< 2.2E-163.31E-14c-mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase
ILMN_3800538ACPL225.90< 2.2E-163.72E-14acid phosphatase-like 2
ILMN_6860392UGT2B1725.83< 2.2E-163.72E-14UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B17
ILMN_4730541SLC44A125.82< 2.2E-163.72E-14solute carrier family 44, member 1
ILMN_4860546CTHRC125.64< 2.2E-164.10E-14collagen triple helix repeat containing 1
ILMN_3460270ZHX324.56< 2.2E-168.79E-14zinc fingers and homeoboxes 3
ILMN_10639RASSF423.21< 2.2E-162.57E-13Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 4
ILMN_1190064UGT2B723.13< 2.2E-162.67E-13UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B7
ILMN_6400603MGC246323.06< 2.2E-162.71E-13poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing
ILMN_3450187IRGM23.04< 2.2E-162.71E-13immunity-related GTPase family, M
ILMN_6620528MT1X22.952.40E-162.85E-13metallothionein 1X
ILMN_1260341IL13RA122.473.67E-164.13E-13interleukin 13 receptor, alpha 1
ILMN_2650112SLC16A222.254.48E-164.91E-13solute carrier family 16, member 2
ILMN_5570170PNMT22.015.59E-165.95E-13phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase
ILMN_870376C9orf15221.936.02E-166.25E-13chromosome 9 open reading frame 152
ILMN_3190379TGFBR321.528.78E-168.89E-13transforming growth factor, beta receptor III
ILMN_1780142DSCR121.081.33E-151.31E-12Down syndrome critical region gene 1
ILMN_2640341FKBP520.632.05E-151.89E-12FK506 binding protein 5
ILMN_7610136LOC65262620.432.48E-152.23E-12Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B member 2
ILMN_1410609CORO2A20.342.72E-152.35E-12coronin, actin binding protein, 2A
ILMN_1780088TBXA2R20.292.84E-152.40E-12thromboxane A2 receptor
ILMN_270431BAALC20.233.02E-152.50E-12brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic
ILMN_6280176GBE120.023.72E-153.01E-12glucan (1,4-alpha-), branching enzyme 1
ILMN_6060113TBX1519.814.62E-153.67E-12T-box 15
ILMN_4890743IQSEC119.715.09E-153.97E-12IQ motif and Sec7 domain 1
ILMN_150056DPEP119.655.41E-154.13E-12dipeptidase 1
ILMN_2060364BTNL919.268.04E-155.91E-12butyrophilin-like 9
ILMN_3830735UPB119.238.30E-155.91E-12ureidopropionase, beta
ILMN_5670377STYK119.159.09E-156.35E-12serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase 1
ILMN_4390630STAG318.721.42E-149.39E-12stromal antigen 3
ILMN_4070048NPHP418.441.91E-141.25E-11nephronophthisis 4
ILMN_4220474C6orf8118.312.16E-141.39E-11chromosome 6 open reading frame 81
ILMN_1470746PTPN318.302.23E-141.41E-11protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 3
ILMN_5860576C20orf13318.252.36E-141.47E-11MACRO domain containing 2
ILMN_6020468PPP1R14A18.182.52E-141.55E-11protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 14A
ILMN_1400634MT1M18.102.76E-141.64E-11metallothionein 1M
ILMN_4250315ITGA917.903.46E-142.03E-11integrin, alpha 9
ILMN_5080471MAP3K617.406.02E-143.44E-11mitogen-activated protein kinase 6
ILMN_5360242FLJ4246117.366.28E-143.53E-11smoothelin-like 2
ILMN_6620402NUDT1617.336.50E-143.60E-11nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 16
ILMN_3360112TMEM217.267.04E-143.85E-11transmembrane protein 2
ILMN_6840743PER117.227.41E-143.99E-11period homolog 1
ILMN_4220347LRRC117.128.29E-144.33E-11leucine rich repeat containing 1
ILMN_4850592P2RY1417.118.35E-144.33E-11purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 14
ILMN_6560300SLC31A216.911.05E-135.39E-11solute carrier family 31 member 2
ILMN_4060091DKFZ16.871.11E-135.62E-11DKFZp451A211 protein
ILMN_6770370LOC9219616.282.23E-131.11E-10death associated protein-like 1
ILMN_580487IL9R16.212.40E-131.18E-10interleukin 9 receptor
ILMN_1990300SOCS116.182.49E-131.21E-10suppressor of cytokine signaling 1
ILMN_5720424NRP116.172.54E-131.22E-10neuropilin 1
ILMN_4180427CIB416.112.74E-131.30E-10calcium and integrin binding family member 4
ILMN_4180544ROPN1L16.082.81E-131.32E-10ropporin 1-like
ILMN_4250167SOX1316.042.95E-131.37E-10SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 13
ILMN_6330170CHKA15.813.94E-131.81E-10choline kinase alpha, 3
ILMN_4560192SFXN515.624.95E-132.25E-10sideroflexin 5
ILMN_2810136CAPN1115.565.33E-132.40E-10calpain 11
ILMN_2690709VIPR115.386.68E-132.91E-10vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1
ILMN_630091NCOA715.386.69E-132.91E-10nuclear receptor coactivator 7
ILMN_5390730MGC1733015.218.25E-133.55E-10phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1
ILMN_130364MST15015.198.49E-133.62E-10MSTP150
ILMN_3450241KIAA077414.951.16E-124.77E-10KIAA0774
ILMN_2230678ACACB14.801.41E-125.76E-10acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase beta
ILMN_5870307LOC44035914.781.44E-125.83E-10similar to muscle Y-box protein YB2
ILMN_3840554SPOCK214.761.49E-125.95E-10sparc/osteonectin, cwcv and kazal-like domains 2
ILMN_5810600MAP3K514.691.63E-126.47E-10mitogen-activated protein kinase 5
ILMN_2360719IRAK314.651.71E-126.65E-10interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 3
ILMN_1510121MTSS114.641.73E-126.66E-10metastasis suppressor 1
ILMN_540671LILRB214.541.98E-127.41E-10leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B, member 2
ILMN_6980377MTMR1514.442.26E-128.39E-10myotubularin related protein 15
ILMN_6220288PRDM114.432.28E-128.39E-10PR domain containing 1, with ZNF domain
ILMN_7330739NDRG414.422.30E-128.39E-10NDRG family member 4
ILMN_2600470WDR6014.203.10E-121.12E-09WD repeat domain 60
ILMN_4050441SH3MD414.163.27E-121.17E-09SH3 multiple domains 4
ILMN_6760546TIPARP13.894.74E-121.64E-09TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
ILMN_2760537MTE13.894.75E-121.64E-09metallothionein E
ILMN_160019SORT113.795.44E-121.83E-09sortilin 1
ILMN_6330132ISG2013.607.00E-122.32E-09interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 kDa
ILMN_1510685DOK413.527.86E-122.58E-09docking protein 4
ILMN_1240228PAG113.478.50E-122.77E-09phosphoprotein associated glycosphingolipid microdomains 1
ILMN_580592CPNE813.321.04E-113.31E-09copine VIII
ILMN_5870301KIAA051313.321.05E-113.31E-09KIAA0513
ILMN_20129CD5213.321.05E-113.31E-09CD52 molecule
ILMN_1820386PARVB13.311.06E-113.31E-09parvin, beta
ILMN_6200402MT1A13.241.17E-113.64E-09metallothionein 1A
ILMN_290661CLN813.101.43E-114.36E-09ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 8
ILMN_670082GNA1213.081.47E-114.43E-09guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) alpha 12
ILMN_5570286TACC212.991.67E-115.00E-09transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2
ILMN_3190411STARD1312.931.81E-115.32E-09START domain containing 13
ILMN_4540138NGB12.921.85E-115.39E-09neuroglobin
ILMN_2000646B4GALT412.832.10E-116.07E-09UDP-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 4
ILMN_7100731CYGB12.812.17E-116.17E-09cytoglobin
ILMN_7050113NTRK112.712.52E-117.09E-09neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor, type 1
ILMN_2490670GNPTAB12.662.71E-117.52E-09N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase, alpha and beta
ILMN_20170ZNF38512.483.55E-119.72E-09zinc finger protein 385
ILMN_2630687CHPT112.433.80E-111.02E-08choline phosphotransferase 1
ILMN_4120215WASF212.433.81E-111.02E-08WAS protein family, member 2
ILMN_5260494TMLHE12.394.06E-111.08E-08trimethyllysine hydroxylase, epsilon
ILMN_5220333C14orf13912.314.54E-111.20E-08chromosome 14 open reading frame 139
ILMN_3850440FCER1G12.126.07E-111.60E-08Fc fragment of IgE, receptor for; gamma polypeptide
ILMN_1030008TGFB312.116.21E-111.63E-08transforming growth factor, beta 3
ILMN_1450468MYT112.027.04E-111.81E-08myelin transcription factor 1
ILMN_7560541SLC2A512.017.19E-111.83E-08solute carrier family 2 member 5
ILMN_2030438GBA212.017.21E-111.83E-08glucosidase, beta (bile acid) 2
ILMN_6840328SMAD312.007.35E-111.86E-08SMAD family member 3
ILMN_3930390SMAP1L11.918.40E-112.11E-08stromal membrane-associated protein 1-like
ILMN_7570196TSPAN911.908.54E-112.12E-08tetraspanin 9
ILMN_6980546CACNA1I11.908.56E-112.12E-08calcium channel, voltage-dependent, T type, alpha 1I subunit
ILMN_1710364LCN611.898.72E-112.15E-08lipocalin 6
ILMN_5360424RPS6KA211.771.04E-102.54E-08ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90 kDa, polypeptide 2
ILMN_5890193MS4A4A11.721.14E-102.75E-08membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A, member 4
ILMN_3390292KLF911.661.24E-102.98E-08Kruppel-like factor 9
ILMN_5720059GFOD111.651.26E-103.02E-08glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain containing 1
ILMN_7650523TMEM4611.571.43E-103.39E-08transmembrane protein 46
ILMN_5700392LOC65400011.461.70E-103.95E-08ribosome biogenesis protein BMS1 homolog 2
ILMN_4810348C1orf18811.401.88E-104.33E-08chromosome 1 open reading frame 188
ILMN_4280180CHRNA311.391.91E-104.37E-08cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 3
ILMN_270458CRISPLD111.371.96E-104.45E-08cysteine-rich secretory protein LCCL domain containing 1
ILMN_450615MT2A11.371.97E-104.46E-08metallothionein 2A
ILMN_20470GRASP11.352.02E-104.51E-08GRP1-associated scaffold protein
ILMN_3370594LILRA211.352.03E-104.51E-08leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily A, member 2
ILMN_5220397RREB111.342.05E-104.53E-08ras responsive element binding protein 1
ILMN_1410192TDRD911.342.07E-104.56E-08tudor domain containing 9
ILMN_4070259LOC65313311.272.30E-104.99E-08guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) alpha 12
ILMN_5960682RBPMS211.242.41E-105.21E-08RNA binding protein with multiple splicing 2
ILMN_1440300SLC27A311.222.50E-105.37E-08solute carrier family 27, member 3
ILMN_5050768LONRF111.202.58E-105.53E-08LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 1
ILMN_6270273KHDRBS311.182.67E-105.68E-08KH domain, RNA binding, signal transduction associated 3
ILMN_7100603KCNK311.172.70E-105.72E-08potassium channel, subfamily K, member 3
ILMN_2320129CSDA11.033.38E-107.08E-08cold shock domain protein A
ILMN_3930022LOC64473910.993.63E-107.54E-08Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 4
ILMN_7400133CUGBP210.904.20E-108.63E-08CUG triplet repeat, RNA binding protein 2
ILMN_3290301FZD810.884.33E-108.76E-08frizzled homolog 8
ILMN_7320520MTUS110.884.33E-108.76E-08mitochondrial tumor suppressor 1
ILMN_3780053PALLD10.824.79E-109.60E-08palladin, cytoskeletal associated protein
ILMN_6860162LOC44101910.745.49E-101.09E-07hypothetical LOC441019
ILMN_5810154ALOX15B10.745.50E-101.09E-07arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase, type B
ILMN_3930736CHST310.735.59E-101.09E-07carbohydrate (chondroitin 6) sulfotransferase 3
ILMN_60470STX1110.725.68E-101.10E-07syntaxin 11
ILMN_3390484SERINC210.695.95E-101.15E-07serine incorporator 2
ILMN_1430647TAX1BP310.616.82E-101.31E-07Tax1 (human T-cell leukemia virus type I) binding protein 3
ILMN_5960440VDR10.606.99E-101.34E-07vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor
ILMN_6290735EPHB310.518.10E-101.53E-07EPH receptor B3
ILMN_2680372SH2D4A10.468.78E-101.64E-07SH2 domain containing 4A
ILMN_2480050SOX710.449.13E-101.69E-07SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 7
ILMN_130128LOC28501610.419.61E-101.76E-07hypothetical protein LOC285016
ILMN_4890451GRAMD310.399.87E-101.80E-07GRAM domain containing 3
ILMN_770161C10orf7310.399.92E-101.81E-07chromosome 10 open reading frame 73
ILMN_2450202KIF3C10.351.05E-091.88E-07kinesin family member 3C
ILMN_6840468HAL10.351.06E-091.89E-07histidine ammonia-lyase
ILMN_2470070TBL1X10.301.15E-092.04E-07transducin (beta)-like 1X-linked
ILMN_2320114KLF1310.271.22E-092.15E-07Kruppel-like factor 13
ILMN_6380112DIP10.231.31E-092.27E-07death-inducing-protein
ILMN_2470358IFNGR110.221.32E-092.30E-07interferon gamma receptor 1
ILMN_4250735IL27RA10.071.70E-092.91E-07interleukin 27 receptor, alpha
ILMN_1470215MAP3K810.071.72E-092.91E-07mitogen-activated protein kinase 8
ILMN_2940373TACC110.061.74E-092.94E-07transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1
Downregulated
ILMN_770538LYSMD2-15.495.81E-132.58E-10LysM, putative peptidoglycan-binding, domain containing 2
ILMN_7150059STAMBPL1-14.611.79E-126.84E-10STAM binding protein-like 1
ILMN_5340692STRBP-14.561.93E-127.31E-10spermatid perinuclear RNA binding protein
ILMN_4210397GLDC-14.053.80E-121.34E-09glycine dehydrogenase
ILMN_6980327DKC1-13.795.44E-121.83E-09dyskeratosis congenita 1, dyskerin
ILMN_50086TCF12-13.231.19E-113.69E-09transcription factor 12
ILMN_4860356BYSL-12.812.17E-116.17E-09bystin-like
ILMN_4280228IVNS1ABP-12.702.55E-117.12E-09influenza virus NS1A binding protein
ILMN_1990379SLFN11-11.829.63E-112.36E-08schlafen family member 11
ILMN_5220338MPEG1-11.641.27E-103.03E-08macrophage expressed gene 1
ILMN_450168SFRS7-11.501.60E-103.74E-08splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 7, 35 kDa
ILMN_3460687KIAA0690-11.421.81E-104.19E-08ribosomal RNA processing 12 homolog
ILMN_3400360MAPRE2-11.361.99E-104.48E-08microtubule-associated protein, RP/EB family, member 2
ILMN_4010414PPFIBP1-11.122.92E-106.16E-08PTPRF interacting protein, binding protein 1 (liprin beta 1)
ILMN_1190139UGT3A2-10.993.61E-107.54E-08UDP glycosyltransferase 3 family, polypeptide A2
ILMN_4150201BCL2-10.933.99E-108.24E-08B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2
ILMN_780240C12orf24-10.854.53E-109.13E-08chromosome 12 open reading frame 24
ILMN_6760167MARCH3-10.735.60E-101.09E-07membrane-associated ring finger (C3HC4) 3
ILMN_3940615PUS7-10.527.99E-101.52E-07pseudouridylate synthase 7 homolog
ILMN_20544GART-10.419.53E-101.76E-07phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase
ILMN_2480326HSP90B1-10.361.05E-091.88E-07heat shock protein 90 kDa beta (Grp94), member 1
ILMN_5270367CTSC-10.251.26E-092.20E-07cathepsin C
ILMN_5420095MYC-10.211.36E-092.34E-07v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog
ILMN_4610180PIK3C2B-10.201.38E-092.37E-07phosphoinositide-3-kinase, class 2, beta polypeptide
ILMN_6450300GEMIN4-10.001.95E-093.27E-07gem (nuclear organelle) associated protein 4

t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate

Genes regulated 8 hours following dexamethasone treatment. t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate The most significantly differentially expressed gene at the 8 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoint was ZBTB16, a known transcriptional repressor and glucocorticoid response gene, which has been shown to modulate glucocorticoid sensitivity in CEM T-ALL cells [31]. Other known glucocorticoid response genes upregulated included TSC22D3 [32] and SOCS1 [15], both downstream targets of the glucocorticoid receptor, FKBP5 [33], a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor, and MAP kinases 5, 6 and 8 [34]. Downregulated genes at 8 hours included BCL-2 [35] and C-MYC [36], both previously described, but also HSP90B1, a glucocorticoid receptor co-chaperone and regulator of apoptosis. The only pro-apoptotic gene consistently upregulated across multiple microarray analyses is the BH3-only BCL-2 family member BIM, and it has been shown that BIM has a critical role in glucocorticoid sensitivity and resistance [37], although in this current study BIM was only induced 1.3 fold. Thus these genes identified are consistent with previous reports of glucocorticoid-induced genes in ALL. Within these experimental systems however there are significant potential differences in glucocorticoid exposure between in vitro and in vivo models - a crucial one is that cells in vitro are continuously exposed to glucocorticoid whereas in in vivo models the glucocorticoid is subject to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes which more accurately reflect changes in patients. At the later timepoints, significant differential gene expression was much less marked and predominantly downregulated. At 24 hours 5 genes were upregulated (t-statistic > 6) and 10 genes downregulated (t-statistic < -6, table 4), and at 48 hours 1 gene was upregulated (t-statistic > 6) and 15 genes downregulated (t-statistic < -6, table 5). At 24 hours, upregulated genes included NFKBIA, an inhibitor of NF-ΚB, and TRIM74, which was sustained at 48 hours, the significance of which is uncertain. Downregulated genes were those involved in cell cycle progression, including CCNF at 24 hours, and CCNF, CDC20 and AURKA at 48 hours, consistent with growth arrest.
Table 4

Genes regulated 24 hours following dexamethasone treatment.

ProbeSet IDGenetPFDRDefinition
Upregulated
ILMN_3930687FAM112A6.671.32E-060.0091family with sequence similarity 112, member A
ILMN_6620255TRIM746.293.06E-060.0132tripartite motif-containing 74
ILMN_4280113NFKBIA6.233.48E-060.0138nuclear factor kappa B inhibitor, alpha
ILMN_2140136EMR26.104.65E-060.0149egf-like containing, mucin-like, hormone receptor-like 2
ILMN_7000397ANKRD156.084.91E-060.0149ankyrin repeat domain 15
Downregulated
ILMN_870524HOXB8-8.602.53E-080.0011homeo box B8
ILMN_4830520LOC144501-6.721.19E-060.0091hypothetical protein LOC144501
ILMN_6110332ARHGAP19-6.701.24E-060.0091Rho GTPase activating protein 19
ILMN_2970619ESPL1-6.651.38E-060.0091extra spindle pole bodies homolog 1
ILMN_3130541CCNF-6.641.43E-060.0091cyclin F
ILMN_4760577CENPA-6.621.46E-060.0091centromere protein A
ILMN_4810646PIF1-6.541.76E-060.0095PIF1 5'-to-3' DNA helicase homolog
ILMN_1070762PSRC1-6.402.38E-060.0114proline/serine-rich coiled-coil 1
ILMN_4860703LOC648695-6.193.82E-060.0138retinoblastoma binding protein 4
ILMN_1110538INCENP-6.055.19E-060.0149inner centromere protein antigens 135/155 kDa

t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate

Table 5

Genes regulated 48 hours following dexamethasone treatment.

ProbeSet IDGenetPFDRDefinition
Upregulated
ILMN_6620255TRIM746.303.01E-060.0089tripartite motif-containing 74
Downregulated
ILMN_4810646PIF1-8.851.58E-080.0004PIF1 5'-to-3' DNA helicase homolog
ILMN_870524HOXB8-8.662.26E-080.0004homeo box B8
ILMN_1450193LGALS1-8.572.66E-080.0004lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 1 (galectin 1)
ILMN_4760577CENPA-7.641.71E-070.0018centromere protein A
ILMN_4730605AURKA-7.472.42E-070.0021aurora kinase A
ILMN_1500010CDC20-6.849.09E-070.0053CDC20 cell division cycle 20 homolog
ILMN_4060064HMMR-6.829.61E-070.0053hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor
ILMN_2070408MID1-6.809.97E-070.0053midline 1 (Opitz/BBB syndrome)
ILMN_2070288MT1E-6.661.36E-060.0065metallothionein 1E
ILMN_1070762PSRC1-6.601.55E-060.0067proline/serine-rich coiled-coil 1
ILMN_150543C20orf129-6.462.12E-060.0077chromosome 20 open reading frame 129
ILMN_5870193FAM64A-6.452.14E-060.0077family with sequence similarity 64, member A
ILMN_2810201KIF14-6.342.77E-060.0089kinesin family member 14
ILMN_1050195KIF20A-6.283.11E-060.0089kinesin family member 20A
ILMN_3130541CCNF-6.055.21E-060.0131cyclin F

t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate

Genes regulated 24 hours following dexamethasone treatment. t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate Genes regulated 48 hours following dexamethasone treatment. t, t-statistic; and FDR, false discovery rate Functional analysis using GSEA and meta-GSEA on the expression profiles obtained at 8 hours and 24 hours after dexamethasone treatment (additional files 1 and 2), revealed a significant upregulation of metabolic pathways, particularly adipogenesis at 8 hours, and a marked effect on pathways associated with cell cycling and proliferation, particularly downregulation of C-MYC at 8 hours and NF-ΚB at 24 hours, and upregulation of apoptotic pathways at 24 hours. Glucocorticoids are known to have effects on multiple cellular metabolic pathways, including glucose and carbohydrate metabolism, and have pro-adipogenic effects [38]. Suppression of C-MYC is a critical step prior to the initiation of apoptosis by dexamethasone in ALL [39] and suppression of NF-ΚB has been described [40]. To determine whether the molecular response to glucocorticoids in this xenograft model of ALL mimicked the effects seen in either glucocorticoid-treated patients with ALL [16] or cell-line models of ALL [13], we applied parametric gene set enrichment analysis (PGSEA) [28]. Comparing gene expression profiles from multiple experiments is notoriously difficult and typically any true similarities are swamped by technical differences in microarray vendor, normalization strategies and analytical approach. By summarizing genes at the gene set level (such as genes in the same pathway), these technical differences are mitigated, allowing comparison of samples from multiple studies. We performed PGSEA on the 6-8 hour samples from the 3 studies, and then two-dimensional hierarchical clustering to identify the relationships between the different ALL models (Figure 2 and annotated in additional file 3). This revealed considerable heterogeneity in the molecular response to glucocorticoids in patients into at least 2, and possibly 4 different groups (green bars, Figure 2), which may represent different modes of response to glucocorticoids in patients. Relative to this inter-patient heterogeneity, both cell lines (purple bars, Figure 2) and xenografts (black bars, Figure 2) are remarkably reproducible; we anticipate that adding additional xenograft models of ALL from distinct patients will mirror the heterogeneity of the patient from whom they were derived. It is also evident that overall, glucocorticoid-treated xenografts co-cluster with a group of 3 patients (B-ALL-37, -38, and -40), all of whom had BCP-ALL and a good early prednisolone response, with varied cytogenetics (hyperploidy, t(12;21), and normal respectively). At more relaxed clustering thresholds, the glucocorticoid-treated xenografts cluster with 4 other patients with BCP-ALL (B-ALL-24, -31, -33, and 43) and the cell lines.
Figure 2

Parametric GSEA of combined top 100 glucocorticoid-induced gene sets with greatest variance from xenograft, patient and cell line models. Hierarchical clustering with gene sets in rows, samples in columns (xenografts - black, patient - green, cell line - purple). Each colour of each cell represents the Z-score (see legend). Boxes 1-5 represent defined clusters.

Parametric GSEA of combined top 100 glucocorticoid-induced gene sets with greatest variance from xenograft, patient and cell line models. Hierarchical clustering with gene sets in rows, samples in columns (xenografts - black, patient - green, cell line - purple). Each colour of each cell represents the Z-score (see legend). Boxes 1-5 represent defined clusters. We identified 5 clusters of gene sets with distinct expression profiles, each behaving differently in the 3 models of ALL. Cluster 1 demonstrated the markedly heterogeneous patterns seen in patient samples, with the xenograft samples showing a pattern similar to 8 of the patients; cluster 2 showed genesets that showed strong enrichment in the cell line study, and included a number of genesets associated with cell proliferation; cluster 3 did not show any striking differences across the three ALL models; cluster 4 showed genesets downregulated in both xenografts and cell lines compared to the patient samples, and included a number genesets associated with cell cycle progression, DNA/RNA replication and MYC; cluster 5 showed genesets strongly downregulated in the xenograft and cell line models, and included genesets associated with MYC and metabolic processes, particularly catabolism and energy production. In this limited comparison, it is clear that glucocorticoid-induced gene expression patterns seen in ALL are dependent on the experimental model, and that the patterns derived from the xenograft model show a greater similarity to patient-derived data than to cell lines. A search of the TRANSFAC database v8.3 [41] of CoMoDis [42] identified GRE motifs (within 100 kb either side of the gene) in only 25 (14.5%) of the top 173 upregulated genes at the 8 hour timepoint in this study, and no GRE motifs were identified in the upregulated genes at 24 or 48 hours. This supports accumulating evidence that glucocorticoids exert long-range effects through very distal steroid receptor binding sites [43]. Analysis of significantly differentially expressed glucocorticoid-induced genes in an in vitro cell line study [13] revealed a similar number of early response genes after 6 hours of exposure (60 upregulated (t-stat > 10) and 27 downregulated (t-stat < -10)) but a significantly greater number of genes after 24 hours (593 upregulated (t-stat > 10) and 782 downregulated (t-stat < -10)). Interestingly, all but 2 of the genes upregulated at 6 hours remained significantly upregulated at 24 hours, and 17 of the downregulated genes at 6 hours remained downregulated at 24 hours. GRE motifs were identified in 15 (25.0%) of the top 60 upregulated genes at 6 hours, and 87 (14.6%) of the top 593 genes at 24 hours. The observed difference between the studies in gene expression at later timepoints is consistent with continuous rather than physiological glucocorticoid exposure. In addition, in the cell line study, the GR (NR3C1) undergoes highly significant early and sustained autoupregulation, which in the continuous presence of ligand drives downstream gene expression. In contrast, in the xenograft model minimal GR upregulation is seen at the early timepoint but no significant change in GR expression is seen at either of the later timepoints. Given the good statistical power observed in Figure 1A, we proceeded to determine whether we could use fewer replicates and still identify a majority of the differentially expressed genes. Replicate analysis (Figure 3) revealed that at the 8 hour dexamethasone-treated timepoint, a dataset with high signal and differential expression, using data from any 3 randomly chosen biological replicates instead of 4 resulted in excellent recovery scores of > 0.9. That is, on average, 90% of the differentially expressed genes identified from all 4 samples were also identified in any combination of 3 arrays. At 24 hours, a timepoint with less signal, the average recovery score was 0.85 with 3 replicates, but was more variable than at 8 hours. Using just 2 biological replicates recovered 88% of the list of differentially expressed genes at 8 hours, which dropped to 14% at 24 hours. This confirms that the 8 hour time point has the strongest signal, which is reproducible across different subsets of biological replicates. We recommend using a minimum of 3 biological replicates, since fewer replicates destabilized our ability to identify differentially expressed genes. This has important considerations for experimental design, and has significant implications on cost and animal numbers.
Figure 3

Recovery scores at 8 hours and 24 hours when randomly selecting all combinations of 3 replicates (3rep) or 2 replicates (2rep) from the set of 4 biological replicates. The Recovery Score represents the proportion of differentially expressed genes from all 4 replicates recovered when using fewer replicates.

Recovery scores at 8 hours and 24 hours when randomly selecting all combinations of 3 replicates (3rep) or 2 replicates (2rep) from the set of 4 biological replicates. The Recovery Score represents the proportion of differentially expressed genes from all 4 replicates recovered when using fewer replicates.

Conclusions

We conclude that the NOD/SCID ALL xenograft mouse model provides biologically relevant insights into glucocorticoid-induced gene expression, in a consistent, reproducible and clinically relevant model system. We have demonstrated that the 8 hour timepoint provides the highest number of significantly differentially expressed genes, that time-matched controls are redundant and excellent recovery scores can be obtained with 3 replicates. We have thus established the optimal experimental design, with subsequent important implications for costs and animal numbers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

VAB performed all experimental work and wrote the paper, VAB and MJC analyzed the data, TNT provided critical appraisal of the paper and WK and RBL designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1

metaGSEA of genesets 8 hours after treatment with dexamethasone. metaGSEA of top 100 up- and down-regulated genesets identified by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) 8 hours after treatment with dexamethasone. Click here for file

Additional file 2

metaGSEA of genesets 24 hours after treatment with dexamethasone. metaGSEA of top 100 up- and down-regulated genesets identified by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) 24 hours after treatment with dexamethasone. Click here for file

Additional file 3

Annotated pGSEA comparing glucocorticoid-induced genesets in xenograft, cell line and patient datasets. Hierarchical cluster by parametric Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (PGSEA) of the top 100 genesets with the greatest variance across three models (xenograft in vivo, cell line in vitro, patient in vivo) of glucocorticoid-induced gene expression in ALL, with annotation of the gene sets. Click here for file
  43 in total

1.  Expression profiling of glucocorticoid-treated T-ALL cell lines: rapid repression of multiple genes involved in RNA-, protein- and nucleotide synthesis.

Authors:  P Obexer; U Certa; R Kofler; A Helmberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  The effect of replication on gene expression microarray experiments.

Authors:  Paul Pavlidis; Qinghong Li; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Steroid receptors: elements for modulation of eukaryotic transcription.

Authors:  K R Yamamoto; B M Alberts
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  M Dördelmann; A Reiter; A Borkhardt; W D Ludwig; N Götz; S Viehmann; H Gadner; H Riehm; M Schrappe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Gene expression profiles of proliferating vs. G1/G0 arrested human leukemia cells suggest a mechanism for glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  M Tonko; M J Ausserlechner; D Bernhard; A Helmberg; R Kofler
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A new dexamethasone-induced gene of the leucine zipper family protects T lymphocytes from TCR/CD3-activated cell death.

Authors:  F D'Adamio; O Zollo; R Moraca; E Ayroldi; S Bruscoli; A Bartoli; L Cannarile; G Migliorati; C Riccardi
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Gene expression profile of human lymphoid CEM cells sensitive and resistant to glucocorticoid-evoked apoptosis.

Authors:  Rheem D Medh; M Scott Webb; Aaron L Miller; Betty H Johnson; Yuriy Fofanov; Tongbin Li; Thomas G Wood; Bruce A Luxon; E Brad Thompson
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Cyclin D3 and c-MYC control glucocorticoid-induced cell cycle arrest but not apoptosis in lymphoblastic leukemia cells.

Authors:  M J Ausserlechner; P Obexer; G Böck; S Geley; R Kofler
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment.

Authors:  Seon-Young Kim; David J Volsky
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using Radiolabeled 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine with PET to Monitor the Effect of Dexamethasone on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher I McHugh; Monica R Thipparthi; Jawana M Lawhorn-Crews; Lisa Polin; Shirish Gadgeel; Janice Akoury; Thomas J Mangner; Kirk A Douglas; Jing Li; Manohar Ratnam; Anthony F Shields
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Venetoclax responses of pediatric ALL xenografts reveal sensitivity of MLL-rearranged leukemia.

Authors:  Seong Lin Khaw; Santi Suryani; Kathryn Evans; Jennifer Richmond; Alissa Robbins; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Catherine A Billups; Stephen W Erickson; Yuelong Guo; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith; Hernan Carol; Andrew W Roberts; David C S Huang; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Cell and molecular determinants of in vivo efficacy of the BH3 mimetic ABT-263 against pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenografts.

Authors:  Santi Suryani; Hernan Carol; Triona Ni Chonghaile; Viktoras Frismantas; Chintanu Sarmah; Laura High; Beat Bornhauser; Mark J Cowley; Barbara Szymanska; Kathryn Evans; Ingrid Boehm; Elise Tonna; Luke Jones; Donya Moradi Manesh; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Catherine Billups; Warren Kaplan; Anthony Letai; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Quantitative phosphotyrosine profiling of patient-derived xenografts identifies therapeutic targets in pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Sibasish Dolai; Keith C S Sia; Alissa K Robbins; Ling Zhong; Sue L Heatley; Tiffaney L Vincent; Falko Hochgräfe; Rosemary Sutton; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Tamas Revesz; Deborah L White; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith; David T Teachey; Roger J Daly; Mark J Raftery; Richard B Lock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Salidroside overcomes dexamethasone resistance in T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Ya-Na Niu; Yan Zeng; Fang-Fang Zhong; Si-Li Long; Dan-Wei Ren; Xiang Qin; Wen-Jun Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Potential therapeutic targets and small molecular drugs for pediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment based on microarray data.

Authors:  Limei Kong; Xiaowei Zhang; Chao Li; Liping Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Prognostic Relevance of Expression of EMP1, CASP1, and NLRP3 Genes in Pediatric B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Jay Singh; Sarita Kumari; Mohit Arora; Deepak Verma; Jayanth Kumar Palanichamy; Rajive Kumar; Gunjan Sharma; Sameer Bakhshi; Deepam Pushpam; M Shadab Ali; Amar Ranjan; Pranay Tanwar; Shyam S Chauhan; Archna Singh; Anita Chopra
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Stability of gene expression and epigenetic profiles highlights the utility of patient-derived paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia xenografts for investigating molecular mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  Nicholas C Wong; Vivek A Bhadri; Jovana Maksimovic; Mandy Parkinson-Bates; Jane Ng; Jeff M Craig; Richard Saffery; Richard B Lock
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  A pre-clinical model of resistance to induction therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  A L Samuels; A H Beesley; B D Yadav; R A Papa; R Sutton; D Anderson; G M Marshall; C H Cole; U R Kees; R B Lock
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  scGCN is a graph convolutional networks algorithm for knowledge transfer in single cell omics.

Authors:  Qianqian Song; Jing Su; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.