Literature DB >> 22093267

Acute adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents in CMR: multicenter experience with 17,767 patients from the EuroCMR Registry.

Oliver Bruder1, Steffen Schneider, Detlev Nothnagel, Günter Pilz, Massimo Lombardi, Anil Sinha, Anja Wagner, Thorsten Dill, Herbert Frank, Albert van Rossum, Jürg Schwitter, Eike Nagel, Jochen Senges, Georg Sabin, Udo Sechtem, Heiko Mahrholdt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency, manifestation, and severity of acute adverse reactions associated with administration of several gadolinium-based contrast agents to patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) Registry multinational and multicenter setting.
BACKGROUND: The frequency, manifestations, and severity of acute adverse reactions associated with gadolinium-based contrast agents in the specific setting of cardiovascular magnetic resonance have not been systematically evaluated yet.
METHODS: This is a multicenter and multinational registry with consecutive enrollment of patients in 45 European centers. During the current observation, 17,767 doses of gadolinium-based contrast agent were administered to 17,767 patients. The mean dose was 25.6 ml (range 5 to 80 ml), which is equivalent to 0.128 mmol/kg (range 0.012 to 0.3 mmol/kg).
RESULTS: Thirty acute adverse reactions due to contrast administration occurred (0.17%). All reactions were classified as mild according to the American College of Radiology definition. The most frequent complaints following contrast administration were rashes and hives (9 of 30), followed by nausea (7 of 30), and anxiety (6 of 30). The event rate ranged from 0.06% (linear nonionic agent gadodiamide) to 0.47% (linear ionic agent gadobenate dimeglumine). Interestingly, we also found different event rates between the three main indications for CMR imaging, ranging from 0.1% (risk stratification in suspected coronary artery disease) to 0.42% (viability in known coronary artery disease).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute adverse reactions after administration of gadolinium-based contrast in the "off-label" setting of CMR in our population was not different from the incidence in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved general radiology setting. Thus, the off-label use of gadolinium-based contrast in CMR should be regarded as safe concerning the frequency, manifestation, and severity of acute events.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093267     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  23 in total

Review 1.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Left ventricular function assessment in cirrhosis: Current methods and future directions.

Authors:  Francisco Sampaio; Joana Pimenta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Gadolinium deposition within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents-current status.

Authors:  Dragan Stojanov; Aleksandra Aracki-Trenkic; Daniela Benedeto-Stojanov
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents for Cardiac MRI: Use of Linear and Macrocyclic Agents with Associated Safety Profile from 154 779 European Patients.

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Omar Al-Bourini; Rodrigo Salgado; Marco Francone; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Jens Bremerich; Joachim Lotz; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 5.  Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Kerry A Layne; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  [Cardiomyopathies and myocarditis].

Authors:  F von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; J Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Left ventricular mass in patients with a cardiomyopathy after treatment with anthracyclines.

Authors:  Tomas G Neilan; Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Diego Pena-Herrera; Ravi V Shah; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sanjeev A Francis; Javid Moslehi; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Contrast-Induced Vomiting in Pediatric Patients Under Propofol Sedation: A Case Series.

Authors:  Shane C Rainey; Nadia Shaikh; Keith A Hanson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

9.  Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems.

Authors:  Karine Moschetti; Stefano Muzzarelli; Christophe Pinget; Anja Wagner; Günther Pilz; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Detle Nothnagel; Torsten Dill; Herbert Frank; Massimo Lombardi; Oliver Bruder; Heiko Mahrholdt; Jürg Schwitter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany.

Authors:  Julia Boldt; Alexander W Leber; Klaus Bonaventura; Christian Sohns; Martin Stula; Alexander Huppertz; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Marc Dorenkamp
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.